CX-Ray

Name: CX-Ray
Brand: CX-Ray

Swift and validated organizational surveys for reality-driven companies. Embrace the power of data-driven HR!

Est 2014|Raised $120.4M|21 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Website|FTEs 11|HQ Budapest, Budapest, HU

MarketsPerformance Management Employee Engagement & Survey Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Feature differentiation: CX‑Ray is most relevant when an organization values organizational network analysis (influencers, collaboration mapping) alongside pulse and engagement measurement. Many mainstream engagement tools emphasize sentiment drivers, action planning, and benchmarking rather than explicit network mapping. - Pricing transparency: Lattice and Workleap publish USD pricing and packaging more clearly for US buyers; CX‑Ray provides reference pricing but emphasizes custom quotes. - Adoption considerations: Community discussions about engagement tooling often highlight adoption fatigue (additional logins) and the benefit of bundling engagement features into existing HR workflows. This can favor HRIS suites or broad platforms depending on an organization’s existing technology stack.

Market share and adoption trends

No authoritative market share sources for CX‑Ray were identified. The vendor site publishes customer and project metrics; third-party databases provide varying estimates that should be treated cautiously.

	CX‑Ray	Lattice	Workleap Officevibe
Starting Price	Reference pricing published in HUF; public materials present per-employee/month reference figures and emphasize custom quotes	Publishes USD per-user/month pricing and packaged modules for performance/goals/engagement	Publishes USD per-user/month pricing and entry-level plans for pulse and feedback (pricing page lists per-user/month references and minimums)
Typical Fit	Organizations seeking lightweight surveys plus ONA-style diagnostics and dashboards (especially in Hungary/Central Europe contexts)	Organizations seeking a structured performance + goals + engagement suite with ecosystem integrations	SMB and mid-market teams wanting pulse surveys, feedback, and engagement workflows
Key Strength	ONA/network mapping emphasis and short surveys; local consulting and workshop services	Broad performance/OKR suite; clear packaging and enterprise integrations	Simplicity, fast adoption, engagement survey workflows
Key Weakness	Limited mainstream review footprint; security and compliance posture not clearly documented publicly	Can be broader and more expensive than needed for smaller orgs; enterprise packaging may be overkill for simple needs	May be perceived as limited compared to deeper analytics platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Feature differentiation: CX‑Ray is most relevant when an organization values organizational network analysis (influencers, collaboration mapping) alongside pulse and engagement measurement. Many mainstream engagement tools emphasize sentiment drivers, action planning, and benchmarking rather than explicit network mapping.
Pricing transparency: Lattice and Workleap publish USD pricing and packaging more clearly for US buyers; CX‑Ray provides reference pricing but emphasizes custom quotes.
Adoption considerations: Community discussions about engagement tooling often highlight adoption fatigue (additional logins) and the benefit of bundling engagement features into existing HR workflows. This can favor HRIS suites or broad platforms depending on an organization’s existing technology stack.

Market share and adoption trends

	CX‑Ray	Lattice	Workleap Officevibe
Starting Price	Reference pricing published in HUF; public materials present per-employee/month reference figures and emphasize custom quotes	Publishes USD per-user/month pricing and packaged modules for performance/goals/engagement	Publishes USD per-user/month pricing and entry-level plans for pulse and feedback (pricing page lists per-user/month references and minimums)
Typical Fit	Organizations seeking lightweight surveys plus ONA-style diagnostics and dashboards (especially in Hungary/Central Europe contexts)	Organizations seeking a structured performance + goals + engagement suite with ecosystem integrations	SMB and mid-market teams wanting pulse surveys, feedback, and engagement workflows
Key Strength	ONA/network mapping emphasis and short surveys; local consulting and workshop services	Broad performance/OKR suite; clear packaging and enterprise integrations	Simplicity, fast adoption, engagement survey workflows
Key Weakness	Limited mainstream review footprint; security and compliance posture not clearly documented publicly	Can be broader and more expensive than needed for smaller orgs; enterprise packaging may be overkill for simple needs	May be perceived as limited compared to deeper analytics platforms