CyberArk Flows

Name: CyberArk Flows
Brand: CyberArk

Leader

CyberArk is the global leader in identity security.

Est 1999|Valuation $20.6B|Raised $1.5B

LinkedIn 325K|Website|Web traffic 444K|FTEs 4,000|HQ Newton, MA

MarketsIdentity Governance & Administration (IGA)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

#### Okta Workflows vs CyberArk Identity Flows - Okta documents flow limits and tier concepts (for example, active flows and step executions) in its help documentation, which can make capacity planning more straightforward. - Okta community discussions include criticisms about Workflows pricing, specifically regarding per-user pricing where only administrators build flows. - CyberArk’s Flows page presents published list pricing but lacks transparency on limits that typically drive cost. #### Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs CyberArk Identity Flows - Microsoft publishes list pricing for Entra ID tiers and ID Governance. - Entra governance has had community discussions about licensing and enforcement that can create unexpected operational and cost overhead (for example, around guest governance). - CyberArk may be selected where identity programs are tightly integrated with privileged access/security controls and a single-vendor approach is preferred. #### iPaaS (Workato) and IT automation (BetterCloud/Torii) - iPaaS tools can orchestrate identity processes using HTTP and connectors and may offer broader integration and transformation features than identity-vendor workflow modules. - iPaaS platforms can require more engineering and operations maturity and usually do not provide identity-specific governance constructs out of the box.

	CyberArk Identity Flows	Okta Workflows	Microsoft Entra ID Governance
Starting Price (public)	Published per-user pricing available from the vendor	Published tiered pricing with flow-count tiers; details and limits documented in Okta help documentation	Published per-user pricing with annual-commitment options available from the vendor
Suitable For	Organizations aligned with CyberArk looking to combine identity and privileged security workflows and orchestration	Okta customers needing a broad connector ecosystem and identity-centric automation	Microsoft-centered organizations seeking governance and lifecycle tools tightly integrated with M365
Key Strength	Alignment with identity-security controls; design for risk-driven identity workflows	Public documentation on flow limits and an established set of automation patterns and templates	Tight integration with the Microsoft ecosystem and governance packaging
Key Weakness	Public documentation on limits and quotas is limited ("Service Limits Apply" without details)	Community complaints about pricing models and per-user scaling for admin-only tools	Licensing complexity and governance enforcement changes that can add operational or cost overhead

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Okta Workflows vs CyberArk Identity Flows

Okta documents flow limits and tier concepts (for example, active flows and step executions) in its help documentation, which can make capacity planning more straightforward.
Okta community discussions include criticisms about Workflows pricing, specifically regarding per-user pricing where only administrators build flows.
CyberArk’s Flows page presents published list pricing but lacks transparency on limits that typically drive cost.

Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs CyberArk Identity Flows

Microsoft publishes list pricing for Entra ID tiers and ID Governance.
Entra governance has had community discussions about licensing and enforcement that can create unexpected operational and cost overhead (for example, around guest governance).
CyberArk may be selected where identity programs are tightly integrated with privileged access/security controls and a single-vendor approach is preferred.

iPaaS (Workato) and IT automation (BetterCloud/Torii)

iPaaS tools can orchestrate identity processes using HTTP and connectors and may offer broader integration and transformation features than identity-vendor workflow modules.
iPaaS platforms can require more engineering and operations maturity and usually do not provide identity-specific governance constructs out of the box.

	CyberArk Identity Flows	Okta Workflows	Microsoft Entra ID Governance
Starting Price (public)	Published per-user pricing available from the vendor	Published tiered pricing with flow-count tiers; details and limits documented in Okta help documentation	Published per-user pricing with annual-commitment options available from the vendor
Suitable For	Organizations aligned with CyberArk looking to combine identity and privileged security workflows and orchestration	Okta customers needing a broad connector ecosystem and identity-centric automation	Microsoft-centered organizations seeking governance and lifecycle tools tightly integrated with M365
Key Strength	Alignment with identity-security controls; design for risk-driven identity workflows	Public documentation on flow limits and an established set of automation patterns and templates	Tight integration with the Microsoft ecosystem and governance packaging
Key Weakness	Public documentation on limits and quotas is limited ("Service Limits Apply" without details)	Community complaints about pricing models and per-user scaling for admin-only tools	Licensing complexity and governance enforcement changes that can add operational or cost overhead