CyberArk Modern Identity Governance Automation

Name: CyberArk Modern Identity Governance Automation
Brand: CyberArk
Rating: 4.4 (188 reviews)

Leader

CyberArk is the global leader in identity security.

Est 1999|Valuation $20.6B|Raised $1.5B

LinkedIn 325K|Website|Web traffic 444K|FTEs 4,000|HQ Newton, MA

MarketsIdentity Provider (IdP) & Single Sign-On (SSO)Identity Governance & Administration (IGA)

CyberArk Modern Identity Governance Automation screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Differentiators: - The vendor emphasizes automation-focused approaches for campaign preparation, evidence packaging, and application integration, including techniques for applications that lack APIs. - Platform adjacency can be a consideration: organizations that already use the vendor's privileged access controls may find integration benefits in consolidating governance and privilege controls. Where competitors may be stronger: - Some competitors have larger public review corpora and longer market presence specifically in IGA, which can reduce perceived adoption risk for some procurement processes. - Other vendors may offer procurement or licensing models that align more closely with an organization’s existing licensing or cloud provider relationships. Adoption and market signals should be interpreted cautiously; mindshare metrics from commercial comparison sites reflect engagement on those platforms and are not audited market share figures.

	CyberArk Modern IGA (Zilla-powered)	SailPoint Identity Security Cloud	Saviynt Identity Cloud
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Often quote-based / not publicly listed	Marketplace listings indicate example dimensions; enterprise pricing varies
Best For	Organizations prioritizing automated access reviews and broad SaaS integration coverage, especially when governance alignment with privilege controls is desired	Organizations with mature IGA programs that require wide governance breadth and established market presence	Enterprises seeking identity governance with marketplace procurement options and modular packaging
Key Strength	Emphasis on automation for access reviews and integration approaches for applications without APIs	Market maturity, broad install base, and practitioner community	Marketplace procurement channels and broad platform packaging
Key Weakness	Limited public review volume specific to the Modern IGA module; many vendor-reported metrics require independent verification	Can be complex and costly depending on deployment; cloud vs. legacy differences may affect expectations	Community sentiment is mixed; pricing and perceived value can be points of contention

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Differentiators:

The vendor emphasizes automation-focused approaches for campaign preparation, evidence packaging, and application integration, including techniques for applications that lack APIs.
Platform adjacency can be a consideration: organizations that already use the vendor's privileged access controls may find integration benefits in consolidating governance and privilege controls.

Where competitors may be stronger:

Some competitors have larger public review corpora and longer market presence specifically in IGA, which can reduce perceived adoption risk for some procurement processes.
Other vendors may offer procurement or licensing models that align more closely with an organization’s existing licensing or cloud provider relationships.

Adoption and market signals should be interpreted cautiously; mindshare metrics from commercial comparison sites reflect engagement on those platforms and are not audited market share figures.

	CyberArk Modern IGA (Zilla-powered)	SailPoint Identity Security Cloud	Saviynt Identity Cloud
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Often quote-based / not publicly listed	Marketplace listings indicate example dimensions; enterprise pricing varies
Best For	Organizations prioritizing automated access reviews and broad SaaS integration coverage, especially when governance alignment with privilege controls is desired	Organizations with mature IGA programs that require wide governance breadth and established market presence	Enterprises seeking identity governance with marketplace procurement options and modular packaging
Key Strength	Emphasis on automation for access reviews and integration approaches for applications without APIs	Market maturity, broad install base, and practitioner community	Marketplace procurement channels and broad platform packaging
Key Weakness	Limited public review volume specific to the Modern IGA module; many vendor-reported metrics require independent verification	Can be complex and costly depending on deployment; cloud vs. legacy differences may affect expectations	Community sentiment is mixed; pricing and perceived value can be points of contention