CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Name: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
Brand: CyberArk

Leader

CyberArk is the global leader in identity security.

Est 1999|Valuation $20.6B|Raised $1.5B|66 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 325K|Website|Web traffic 444K|FTEs 4,000|HQ Newton, MA

MarketsCloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)Privileged Access Management (PAM)Identity Provider (IdP) & Single Sign-On (SSO)Privileged Access Management (PAM)

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

CyberArk vs BeyondTrust - Both vendors require sales engagement for pricing; neither publishes clear self-serve pricing in most cases. - BeyondTrust emphasizes privileged remote access capabilities and consolidated access pathways. - If the primary driver is vendor/remote access workflows, BeyondTrust may be a candidate; if the driver is deeply governed enterprise vaulting and complex policies, CyberArk is frequently evaluated. CyberArk vs Delinea - Delinea positions itself for simpler deployments and faster adoption; vendor materials and some buyer experiences emphasize lower complexity and shorter time-to-value. - CyberArk emphasizes broader platform coverage and enterprise controls. - Third-party comparisons indicate a tradeoff: CyberArk is perceived as powerful but more complex; Delinea is perceived as easier to deploy but may present scalability considerations in some contexts. Market share/adoption trends - Analyst estimates cited in public notes attribute a sizable market share to CyberArk relative to other PAM vendors; these figures are analyst estimates and should be treated as such rather than audited industry data.

	CyberArk Privileged Access Manager	BeyondTrust (PRA / Password Safe / Total PASM)	Delinea (Secret Server / Platform)
Starting Price	Custom quote (not publicly posted)	Quote-based; pricing page does not list public tiers	Quote-based; often positioned for faster adoption
Typical Use Case	Large enterprises needing mature vaulting, session control, and audit at scale	Organizations needing integrated secure remote access and PAM suite	Organizations prioritizing faster adoption and simpler administration
Key Strength	Depth and maturity of PAM controls; broad protocol/session monitoring; large installed base	Strong remote-access workflows and consolidated access pathways	Positioning focused on simplicity and faster time-to-value
Key Weakness	Complexity, upgrade challenges, administrative overhead, and cost as reported by reviewers	Pricing transparency limited; feature depth varies by SKU	Perception of being less established for certain enterprise-scale scenarios

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

CyberArk vs BeyondTrust

Both vendors require sales engagement for pricing; neither publishes clear self-serve pricing in most cases.
BeyondTrust emphasizes privileged remote access capabilities and consolidated access pathways.
If the primary driver is vendor/remote access workflows, BeyondTrust may be a candidate; if the driver is deeply governed enterprise vaulting and complex policies, CyberArk is frequently evaluated.

CyberArk vs Delinea

Delinea positions itself for simpler deployments and faster adoption; vendor materials and some buyer experiences emphasize lower complexity and shorter time-to-value.
CyberArk emphasizes broader platform coverage and enterprise controls.
Third-party comparisons indicate a tradeoff: CyberArk is perceived as powerful but more complex; Delinea is perceived as easier to deploy but may present scalability considerations in some contexts.

Market share/adoption trends

Analyst estimates cited in public notes attribute a sizable market share to CyberArk relative to other PAM vendors; these figures are analyst estimates and should be treated as such rather than audited industry data.

	CyberArk Privileged Access Manager	BeyondTrust (PRA / Password Safe / Total PASM)	Delinea (Secret Server / Platform)
Starting Price	Custom quote (not publicly posted)	Quote-based; pricing page does not list public tiers	Quote-based; often positioned for faster adoption
Typical Use Case	Large enterprises needing mature vaulting, session control, and audit at scale	Organizations needing integrated secure remote access and PAM suite	Organizations prioritizing faster adoption and simpler administration
Key Strength	Depth and maturity of PAM controls; broad protocol/session monitoring; large installed base	Strong remote-access workflows and consolidated access pathways	Positioning focused on simplicity and faster time-to-value
Key Weakness	Complexity, upgrade challenges, administrative overhead, and cost as reported by reviewers	Pricing transparency limited; feature depth varies by SKU	Perception of being less established for certain enterprise-scale scenarios