Cyberbit

Name: Cyberbit
Brand: Cyberbit

The world's leading cybersecurity readiness platform. Trusted by CISOs, loved by SOC teams.

Est 2015|Valuation $70M|Raised $30M|20 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 26K|Web traffic 7K|FTEs 133|HQ Boston, Massachusetts, US

MarketsSecurity Awareness & Training

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Cyberbit vs Immersive Labs: - Cyberbit focuses on high-fidelity SOC simulation and team-based exercises. Immersive Labs positions around broad workforce upskilling and organization-level resilience measurement. - Vendor and press materials reference third-party analyst coverage; where vendor materials refer to analyst rankings (e.g., Forrester), organizations should confirm claims against the original analyst reports. - Cyberbit vs Hack The Box: - Hack The Box publishes entry pricing and emphasizes large lab catalogs and community-driven content, which can simplify purchasing decisions for smaller teams. - Cyberbit appears oriented toward enterprise SOC readiness programs and bespoke environments, which can increase procurement complexity and cost but may better align with dedicated SOC/IR programs. - Cyberbit vs Cymulate (adjacent): - Cymulate focuses on exposure and controls validation (BAS/CTEM) rather than training as its core offering. - In some organizations, training and controls validation compete for budget; the products are complementary in outcome but different in primary function.

Adoption trends / market presence

Cyberbit’s acquisition of RangeForce indicates consolidation activity in the cyber range and training market and an intent to broaden available modalities for individual and team training.

	Cyberbit	Immersive Labs	Hack The Box (Business)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (enterprise licensing)	Not publicly listed (contact sales)	Public per-seat entry pricing is available
Primary Use Case	SOC/IR teams needing high-fidelity, team-based live exercises; executive crisis simulations	Broad cyber workforce readiness with labs, assessments, and organizational measurement	Hands-on labs/CTFs with large content volume; self-serve/gamified team experiences
Key Strength	Emphasis on operational realism using commercial security tools and team-based exercises	Breadth of training content and organizational measurement	Transparent entry pricing and extensive lab library; active community
Key Weakness	Reported concerns about scenario/integration breadth relative to marketing and pricing opacity	Pricing is sales-led; may be less focused on high-fidelity SOC toolchain replication	May be less aligned to enterprise SOC workflows; emphasis on skills/CTF style rather than team SOC simulation

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Cyberbit vs Immersive Labs:
- Cyberbit focuses on high-fidelity SOC simulation and team-based exercises. Immersive Labs positions around broad workforce upskilling and organization-level resilience measurement.
- Vendor and press materials reference third-party analyst coverage; where vendor materials refer to analyst rankings (e.g., Forrester), organizations should confirm claims against the original analyst reports.
Cyberbit vs Hack The Box:
- Hack The Box publishes entry pricing and emphasizes large lab catalogs and community-driven content, which can simplify purchasing decisions for smaller teams.
- Cyberbit appears oriented toward enterprise SOC readiness programs and bespoke environments, which can increase procurement complexity and cost but may better align with dedicated SOC/IR programs.
Cyberbit vs Cymulate (adjacent):
- Cymulate focuses on exposure and controls validation (BAS/CTEM) rather than training as its core offering.
- In some organizations, training and controls validation compete for budget; the products are complementary in outcome but different in primary function.

Adoption trends / market presence

Cyberbit’s acquisition of RangeForce indicates consolidation activity in the cyber range and training market and an intent to broaden available modalities for individual and team training.

	Cyberbit	Immersive Labs	Hack The Box (Business)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (enterprise licensing)	Not publicly listed (contact sales)	Public per-seat entry pricing is available
Primary Use Case	SOC/IR teams needing high-fidelity, team-based live exercises; executive crisis simulations	Broad cyber workforce readiness with labs, assessments, and organizational measurement	Hands-on labs/CTFs with large content volume; self-serve/gamified team experiences
Key Strength	Emphasis on operational realism using commercial security tools and team-based exercises	Breadth of training content and organizational measurement	Transparent entry pricing and extensive lab library; active community
Key Weakness	Reported concerns about scenario/integration breadth relative to marketing and pricing opacity	Pricing is sales-led; may be less focused on high-fidelity SOC toolchain replication	May be less aligned to enterprise SOC workflows; emphasis on skills/CTF style rather than team SOC simulation