Cyberhaven Data Loss Prevention identifies sensitive information and applies policies to data movement using content inspection, user context, and data lineage across endpoints, browsers, and connected cloud services.
Published Oct 23, 2026
| Starting price | Custom quote; unpublished | Published per-user pricing available from the vendor; licensing prerequisites apply | Custom quote | Quote-based pricing (vendor-provided) |
| Potential fit | Provenance-sensitive IP and data-movement investigations | Microsoft-centered protection and compliance | Buyers needing cloud and on-premises deployment choices | SaaS remediation and AI-workflow controls |
| Key strength | Context from cross-step data lineage | Microsoft ecosystem and licensing integration | Deployment flexibility and broad policy catalog | Explicit SaaS, endpoint, and AI package descriptions |
| Key weakness | Opaque commercial terms; coverage must be tested | Licensing prerequisites and configuration complexity | Quote-led procurement; implementation scope varies | Quote-led pricing; broad claims still require testing |
| Deployment | Cloud service, endpoint/browser sensors, connectors | Microsoft cloud services and supported endpoint controls | Cloud and on-premises options | SaaS APIs, endpoint/browser controls |
| Evaluation route | Demo-led; trial terms not established | Licensing-specific evaluation | Sales-led | Advertised short proof-of-value period |
Cyberhaven’s own comparison now presents its product as a complement to Purview, not only a replacement. Buyers can therefore evaluate a layered model, but should include duplicate licensing and operational complexity in the business case. (Vendor comparison page)
Nightfall’s competitor analysis flags missing public detail on Cyberhaven’s connector-specific scan timing and remediation actions. This is a reasonable diligence question, but Nightfall is a financially interested competitor, not an independent evaluator. Missing documentation does not prove missing functionality. (Competitor blog post)
Cyberhaven’s investigation approach receives corroboration in community discussions, including an evaluator comparing it with Proofpoint. However, competing vendors increasingly advertise lineage and AI analysis too. Cyberhaven’s claim that lineage is available only from Cyberhaven should not be accepted literally without distinguishing the depth and continuity of each implementation. (Industry community discussions)
No defensible percentage market share or installed-customer ranking was established. Vendor-reported growth and review counts are adoption signals, not market-share measurements. The move toward combined DLP, DSPM, insider-risk, and AI offerings is visible in both Cyberhaven’s and Nightfall’s current product packaging. (Vendor press releases and announcements)