Cyclops Security, a Check Point Company

Name: Cyclops Security, a Check Point Company
Brand: Cyclops Security, a Check Point Company
Rating: 4.4 (17 reviews)

AI Native

Unlock the power of AI and unified data in cyber risk exposure management

Est 2022|Valuation $53.7M|Raised $6.4M

LinkedIn 3K|Website|FTEs 39|HQ Tel Aviv, Tel-Aviv District, IL

MarketsCyber Risk Management Vulnerability Management

Cyclops Security, a Check Point Company screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Cyclops vs Tenable One: Tenable positions itself explicitly as an exposure management provider with enterprise packaging and a history in vulnerability management. Tenable publishes materials that frame comparisons across vendors in the category. - Cyclops vs Wiz: Wiz is commonly associated with cloud posture and cloud exposure context; it is widely shortlisted for cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) and cloud exposure use cases. - Cyclops vs Cortex Xpanse: Cortex Xpanse is focused on external attack surface management (EASM) and is a strong option when the primary requirement is internet-facing asset discovery.

Where alternatives may excel

Organizations prioritizing mature vulnerability scanning and long-term enterprise deployments may favor Tenable, Qualys, or Rapid7 due to established market presence.
Organizations that require detailed cloud context graphs often shortlist Wiz or similar cloud-native vendors.
Organizations focused primarily on external discovery and internet-exposed asset intelligence may prefer dedicated EASM tools such as Cortex Xpanse.

Adoption/market trend signals

Check Point’s recent acquisition activity indicates vendor interest in expanding exposure management and CTEM capabilities, suggesting that exposure management remains a strategic area for larger platform vendors.

	Cyclops Security	Tenable One (Exposure Mgmt)	Wiz
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (appears quote-based)	Quote-based	Quote-based
Primary fit	Organizations seeking a consolidated security data layer and contextual search across multiple tools	Organizations standardizing on Tenable for vulnerability scanning and exposure management	Organizations with cloud-first architectures seeking graph-based cloud context and risk prioritization
Key strength	Integration breadth as a core vendor claim; acquisition by Check Point may influence integration into a broader product suite	Established vulnerability management heritage and enterprise packaging	Strong cloud context capabilities and cloud-native risk prioritization
Key weakness	Limited independent review footprint and limited public compliance documentation; integration quality should be validated	Quote-based procurement and potential operational complexity	Cloud-first focus may be less applicable for extensive on-premises assets

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Cyclops vs Tenable One: Tenable positions itself explicitly as an exposure management provider with enterprise packaging and a history in vulnerability management. Tenable publishes materials that frame comparisons across vendors in the category.
Cyclops vs Wiz: Wiz is commonly associated with cloud posture and cloud exposure context; it is widely shortlisted for cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) and cloud exposure use cases.
Cyclops vs Cortex Xpanse: Cortex Xpanse is focused on external attack surface management (EASM) and is a strong option when the primary requirement is internet-facing asset discovery.

Where alternatives may excel

Organizations prioritizing mature vulnerability scanning and long-term enterprise deployments may favor Tenable, Qualys, or Rapid7 due to established market presence.
Organizations that require detailed cloud context graphs often shortlist Wiz or similar cloud-native vendors.
Organizations focused primarily on external discovery and internet-exposed asset intelligence may prefer dedicated EASM tools such as Cortex Xpanse.

Adoption/market trend signals

	Cyclops Security	Tenable One (Exposure Mgmt)	Wiz
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (appears quote-based)	Quote-based	Quote-based
Primary fit	Organizations seeking a consolidated security data layer and contextual search across multiple tools	Organizations standardizing on Tenable for vulnerability scanning and exposure management	Organizations with cloud-first architectures seeking graph-based cloud context and risk prioritization
Key strength	Integration breadth as a core vendor claim; acquisition by Check Point may influence integration into a broader product suite	Established vulnerability management heritage and enterprise packaging	Strong cloud context capabilities and cloud-native risk prioritization
Key weakness	Limited independent review footprint and limited public compliance documentation; integration quality should be validated	Quote-based procurement and potential operational complexity	Cloud-first focus may be less applicable for extensive on-premises assets