Data-Basics

Name: Data-Basics
Brand: Data-Basics
Rating: 4.2 (119 reviews)

All-in-one ERP Software built for the trades. Since 1974.

Est 1974|38 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 703|Website|FTEs 48|HQ Bedford, Ohio, US

MarketsTime, Attendance, & Leave Management ERP Expense Management

Published Oct 14, 2026

01Common complaints

If you want a lightweight expense tool with minimal administrative overhead
- Tools such as Ramp (which offers a low-entry pricing model) or Emburse Spend (clear per-user pricing) may be more appropriate for very small teams with basic policy needs.
If your priority is a modernized consumer-grade user experience above configurability
- Some review excerpts indicate the interface can feel rigid for occasional users and that document upload workflows can be cumbersome.
If you require direct custody of raw database exports for heavy BI use
- At least one administrator review noted dissatisfaction with not having direct access to the underlying database for analytics.
If you require public, detailed security certification information for the ERP line
- SAMPro’s security certifications and detailed controls were not publicly documented in the reviewed sources; request detailed certification artifacts during procurement.
Current limitations acknowledged by the vendor
- The vendor does not publish a consolidated "known issues" page in the materials reviewed.
Limitations evidenced by reviews
- Document/receipt upload friction reported by multiple reviewers.
- Administrator desire for deeper data custody or analytics flexibility.
- Some reviewers report a rigid interface and multi-step workflows for certain tasks.
Roadmap / future features
- Product roadmap details were not publicly documented in the sources reviewed. Procurement teams should request roadmap details and release cadence if this is a purchasing consideration.

- If you want a lightweight expense tool with minimal administrative overhead - Tools such as Ramp (which offers a low-entry pricing model) or Emburse Spend (clear per-user pricing) may be more appropriate for very small teams with basic policy needs. - If your priority is a modernized consumer-grade user experience above configurability - Some review excerpts indicate the interface can feel rigid for occasional users and that document upload workflows can be cumbersome. - If you require direct custody of raw database exports for heavy BI use - At least one administrator review noted dissatisfaction with not having direct access to the underlying database for analytics. - If you require public, detailed security certification information for the ERP line - SAMPro’s security certifications and detailed controls were not publicly documented in the reviewed sources; request detailed certification artifacts during procurement. - Current limitations acknowledged by the vendor - The vendor does not publish a consolidated "known issues" page in the materials reviewed. - Limitations evidenced by reviews - Document/receipt upload friction reported by multiple reviewers. - Administrator desire for deeper data custody or analytics flexibility. - Some reviewers report a rigid interface and multi-step workflows for certain tasks. - Roadmap / future features - Product roadmap details were not publicly documented in the sources reviewed. Procurement teams should request roadmap details and release cadence if this is a purchasing consideration.

Deal disqualifiers: what makes a POOR fit

Very small teams seeking low monthly minimums and self-serve setup.
Teams prioritizing a polished consumer-style mobile UX over configurability and deep allocation controls.
Organizations requiring publicly documented pricing and security posture for the ERP line (SAMPro) prior to engaging sales.

Why some customers leave / churn reasons (evidence + inference)

Direct churn reasons were not well documented in independent sources.
Likely churn drivers inferred from review excerpts:
- Administrative concerns about loss of direct database access for reporting and analysis.
- User experience friction for occasional users (rigid UI, complex workflows).
- Document upload and attachment friction.

02Why they buy

unique selling points supported by customer evidence (not solely vendor claims)
- Centralization of time and expense processing and improved auditability are commonly cited benefits in reviewer comments.
- Some long-term customers report stable operation and limited training burden based on their experience.
unique selling points primarily vendor-described (require validation)
- Vendor materials describe short implementation timelines and specific migration durations for some scenarios; buyers should validate timelines through references.
- Audit trail and compliance features are described in vendor content; buyers should request audit artifacts and control documentation.
Areas where competitors have advantages
- Expense-first vendors often provide more refined mobile UX, rapid self-serve onboarding, and lower entry pricing for small teams.

- unique selling points supported by customer evidence (not solely vendor claims) - Centralization of time and expense processing and improved auditability are commonly cited benefits in reviewer comments. - Some long-term customers report stable operation and limited training burden based on their experience. - unique selling points primarily vendor-described (require validation) - Vendor materials describe short implementation timelines and specific migration durations for some scenarios; buyers should validate timelines through references. - Audit trail and compliance features are described in vendor content; buyers should request audit artifacts and control documentation. - Areas where competitors have advantages - Expense-first vendors often provide more refined mobile UX, rapid self-serve onboarding, and lower entry pricing for small teams.

Why customers chose it (evidence-backed themes)

Centralization and workflow control
- Reviews commonly mention consolidating expenses and timesheets in a single system and improving audit and review processes.
Integration capability as a deciding factor
- Reviewers and vendor materials cite integration with payroll and accounting systems as a key reason for selection.
- Vendor case studies frame purchases as driven by integration needs and support for complex allocations, though case studies are vendor-published and should be validated.

- Centralization and workflow control - Reviews commonly mention consolidating expenses and timesheets in a single system and improving audit and review processes. - Integration capability as a deciding factor - Reviewers and vendor materials cite integration with payroll and accounting systems as a key reason for selection. - Vendor case studies frame purchases as driven by integration needs and support for complex allocations, though case studies are vendor-published and should be validated.

03Field reports

Review availability notes (important context)

Gartner Peer Insights
- Direct review text on some platforms is gated. An alternatives page indicated DATABASICS has a low rating from a very small number of ratings in a "Time and Attendance Software" context, but full review content was not accessible in the crawl.
Community discussions (Reddit/HackerNews)
- No high-signal Reddit threads specifically discussing DATABASICS (vendor website/domain) or SAMPro (vendor product domain) in depth were identified in the sources reviewed; many search hits for “databasics” were unrelated (generic database basics content).

- **Gartner Peer Insights** - Direct review text on some platforms is gated. An alternatives page indicated DATABASICS has a low rating from a very small number of ratings in a "Time and Attendance Software" context, but full review content was not accessible in the crawl. - Community discussions (Reddit/HackerNews) - No high-signal Reddit threads specifically discussing DATABASICS (vendor website/domain) or SAMPro (vendor product domain) in depth were identified in the sources reviewed; many search hits for “databasics” were unrelated (generic database basics content).

G2 (DATABASICS Time & Expense) — example quotes (positive + negative)

Positive
- "I find that Databasics is very user friendly and the app makes it so much easier to prepare your time and expenses, then submit them." (Enterprise user, G2)
- "It’s a quick and easy online time sheet system…Easy setup to integrate with our payroll provider…Timesheet web site is stable and easy for users to figure out." (Mid-market user, G2)
Negative / limitations
- "Sometimes, uploading documents can be a bit challenging…" (Enterprise user, G2)
- "Not great at associating expenses with certain accounts and finding different account numbers." (G2 user)
- "At times, the interface can feel a bit rigid or not very intuitive, especially for new users." (G2 user — mid-range review)

- Positive - "I find that Databasics is very user friendly and the app makes it so much easier to prepare your time and expenses, then submit them." (Enterprise user, G2) - "It’s a quick and easy online time sheet system…Easy setup to integrate with our payroll provider…Timesheet web site is stable and easy for users to figure out." (Mid-market user, G2) - Negative / limitations - "Sometimes, uploading documents can be a bit challenging…" (Enterprise user, G2) - "Not great at associating expenses with certain accounts and finding different account numbers." (G2 user) - "At times, the interface can feel a bit rigid or not very intuitive, especially for new users." (G2 user — mid-range review)

Capterra / GetApp — example quotes and themes

Positive
- "Troubleshooting with helpdesk/ support team is very timely and effective." (Capterra review excerpt)
Negative / admin pain points
- "Implementing the update was going to be an extra cost that we had not budgeted for." (Capterra review excerpt)
- "As an administrator, I dislike the fact that I no longer have physical custody of the database for other analysis or reporting needs." (GetApp review excerpt)

- Positive - "Troubleshooting with helpdesk/ support team is very timely and effective." (Capterra review excerpt) - Negative / admin pain points - "Implementing the update was going to be an extra cost that we had not budgeted for." (Capterra review excerpt) - "As an administrator, I dislike the fact that I no longer have physical custody of the database for other analysis or reporting needs." (GetApp review excerpt)

App Store (mobile app) — example signals

Mixed rating signal
- The iOS App Store shows a middling rating in one regional listing and includes at least one support response indicating user frustration around perceived missing functionality.
- Some users report positive experiences with mobile receipt capture and fast upload for receipts.

Vendor-published case studies (selected)

The vendor publishes case studies (e.g., Common Ground, TechnoServe, CALIBRE, Pathfinder) describing outcomes such as reduced manual processes, improved compliance, and smoother integrations.

Critical evaluation of case study evidence

These materials are vendor-authored and often include customer quotes but typically lack independent validation, detailed baselines, methodologies for measured outcomes, or comprehensive disclosure of total implementation costs and internal labor required.
Buyers should request additional artifacts during procurement, such as:
- Baseline and post-implementation process maps.
- Implementation timelines with internal staffing and vendor service hours.
- Evidence of data validation (for example, audit artifacts or test results).

- These materials are vendor-authored and often include customer quotes but typically lack independent validation, detailed baselines, methodologies for measured outcomes, or comprehensive disclosure of total implementation costs and internal labor required. - Buyers should request additional artifacts during procurement, such as: - Baseline and post-implementation process maps. - Implementation timelines with internal staffing and vendor service hours. - Evidence of data validation (for example, audit artifacts or test results).

Mixed/negative outcomes

No public, detailed accounts of failed implementations were identified in the accessible sources.

04Best fit

Company sizes: specific employee counts and revenue ranges

DATABASICS (time & expense): Vendor materials indicate suitability for small-to-midmarket organizations; product descriptions position it for organizations in the SMB to mid-market range.
SAMPro (ERP): Positioned for mid- to large-sized service and construction contractors; explicit employee or revenue thresholds were not provided in the reviewed material.

Industries and verticals where adoption is strongest (with customer examples)

DATABASICS materials emphasize: government contractors (DCAA/FAR/CAS), nonprofits/NGOs and grant-funded organizations, healthcare (HIPAA support described in marketing), and project-based professional services.
SAMPro materials emphasize specialty contractors (HVAC, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and other trades).

Roles and personas: decision makers AND end users

Decision makers: CFO/Controller, Finance Operations, Payroll leadership, IT/ERP owners, and operations leadership for contractor organizations.
End users: field technicians, hourly staff, traveling employees capturing receipts, and project managers who approve time and expense.

Qualification criteria: what makes a GOOD fit

Organizations with complex allocation needs (project/activity/grant/contract).
Multi-level approval and audit requirements.
A requirement to integrate with an existing ERP/payroll system rather than replace it.
Governance and compliance requirements such as DCAA.

05The pitch

What the product does (core value proposition in objective terms)
- Data-Basics’ portfolio includes two distinct lines that share similar branding:
  - DATABASICS: a B2B SaaS platform for expense reporting, time tracking/timesheets, PTO/leave, and spend controls, emphasizing configurable compliance workflows and integrations to ERP/payroll. (Vendor materials describe it as “Timesheets & Expense Reporting” with cards, PTO, invoices in one place on the product overview and feature pages.)
  - Data-Basics / SAMPro: an ERP suite for field service and construction contractors (dispatch, accounting, job costing, etc.), historically branded SAMPro Enterprise.
- Because the user requested Data-Basics, the primary focus of this report is SAMPro Enterprise ERP; however, the DATABASICS time & expense product is discussed where it affects market perception, reviews, and procurement.
  - Primary focus: SAMPro Enterprise ERP (vendor product pages)
  - Adjacent/related platform: DATABASICS time & expense (vendor product pages) (included where relevant)
Target market and market positioning
- SAMPro Enterprise
  - Presented as an integrated field service and construction management ERP for specialty contractors (e.g., HVAC, mechanical, plumbing, electrical) that prefer a single integrated system rather than multiple point tools. (Vendor materials refer to a single-system approach.)
- DATABASICS
  - Presented toward mid-market and enterprise organizations that require project/grant/job-level allocation, policy controls, auditability, and ERP/payroll integration, with particular focus on regulated environments (government contracting, nonprofits, healthcare).
Company background (founding year, HQ, key leadership)
- Data-Basics, Inc. (SAMPro)
  - Vendor materials state the company was founded in 1974 and is based in the Cleveland, Ohio area (Bedford, OH listed on vendor pages).
- DATABASICS (time & expense)
  - Corporate HQ is shown as Tysons, VA on the vendor’s About page; public profiles list headquarters in Tysons, VA and a founding year of 1997. This suggests the SaaS line’s entity or brand history differs from the SAMPro/ERP history.
- Ownership / corporate events (SAMPro rebrand)
  - A separate SAMPRO timeline indicates an acquisition occurred in 2023 and that the company subsequently rebranded in 2026.
- Leadership
  - Public leadership details for SAMPro are limited in the sources reviewed. DATABASICS’ public employee listings show staff and some names, but a definitive executive roster was not available in the reviewed material.
Funding and growth: investment rounds, acquisitions, estimated customer count/revenue if public
- Acquisition (SAMPro line): Accessible sources indicate the SAMPro line was acquired by another software company in 2023. No purchase price was found in the accessible sources.
- Customer count / revenue: Not publicly documented in the sources accessed.
- DATABASICS (time & expense) integration volume claim: The vendor states there are hundreds of integrations completed. This claim was not independently validated in the material reviewed and should be verified during procurement.
Pricing model with specific tiers and costs where available
- SAMPro Enterprise ERP
  - Pricing is not publicly listed on the SAMPro pages accessed; the product appears sales-led and requires contacting sales for a quote.
- DATABASICS (time & expense) — published pricing
  - The vendor publishes a pricing page with a published starting monthly price described as intended for mid-sized teams, and additional plan tiers (Core/Enterprise) with a feature matrix.
  - The pricing page notes a stated bundle discount when subscribing to both Time Tracking and Expense Reporting.
- Third-party directories sometimes normalize pricing into per-user figures; these normalized figures can be misleading because they may not account for minimums, modules, and implementation fees (e.g., some directories show a low per-user starting estimate that appears to be an estimate rather than an official contractual quote).
Total cost of ownership (TCO) considerations (implementation, training, hidden costs)
- For SAMPro ERP
  - Expected TCO drivers (based on ERP category norms and vendor material): implementation services, data migration, workflow configuration, reporting/analytics setup, and ongoing support/upgrades.
  - The vendor highlights implementation services and ongoing support as part of the offering; no public price list for these services was found.
- For DATABASICS time & expense
  - The vendor indicates customized pricing depending on volumes, integrations, and modules (time, expense, P-card, etc.).
  - Some reviews mention additional costs associated with updates, suggesting potential change-management costs for administrators.
Key competitors in the space (list 4-6 direct alternatives)
- SAMPro ERP (field service and construction ERP)
  - Likely competitor set includes ServiceTitan (mid-market), Oracle NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics, and construction ERPs such as Viewpoint/Trimble, Sage construction products, and Jonas-family products. Not all competitors were verified via the sources reviewed.
- DATABASICS (time & expense / spend)
  - Common alternatives mentioned across sources include SAP Concur, Expensify, Emburse products, Ramp, Rippling, and previously Nexonia.

- What the product does (core value proposition in objective terms) - Data-Basics’ portfolio includes two distinct lines that share similar branding: - **DATABASICS**: a B2B SaaS platform for **expense reporting, time tracking/timesheets, PTO/leave, and spend controls**, emphasizing configurable compliance workflows and integrations to ERP/payroll. (Vendor materials describe it as “Timesheets & Expense Reporting” with cards, PTO, invoices in one place on the product overview and feature pages.) - **Data-Basics / SAMPro**: an **ERP suite for field service and construction contractors** (dispatch, accounting, job costing, etc.), historically branded SAMPro Enterprise. - Because the user requested **Data-Basics**, the primary focus of this report is **SAMPro Enterprise ERP**; however, the DATABASICS time & expense product is discussed where it affects market perception, reviews, and procurement. - **Primary focus:** SAMPro Enterprise ERP (vendor product pages) - **Adjacent/related platform:** DATABASICS time & expense (vendor product pages) (included where relevant) - Target market and market positioning - **SAMPro Enterprise** - Presented as an integrated field service and construction management ERP for specialty contractors (e.g., HVAC, mechanical, plumbing, electrical) that prefer a single integrated system rather than multiple point tools. (Vendor materials refer to a single-system approach.) - **DATABASICS** - Presented toward mid-market and enterprise organizations that require project/grant/job-level allocation, policy controls, auditability, and ERP/payroll integration, with particular focus on regulated environments (government contracting, nonprofits, healthcare). - Company background (founding year, HQ, key leadership) - **Data-Basics, Inc. (SAMPro)** - Vendor materials state the company was founded in 1974 and is based in the Cleveland, Ohio area (Bedford, OH listed on vendor pages). - **DATABASICS (time & expense)** - Corporate HQ is shown as Tysons, VA on the vendor’s About page; public profiles list headquarters in Tysons, VA and a founding year of 1997. This suggests the SaaS line’s entity or brand history differs from the SAMPro/ERP history. - **Ownership / corporate events (SAMPro rebrand)** - A separate SAMPRO timeline indicates an acquisition occurred in 2023 and that the company subsequently rebranded in 2026. - Leadership - Public leadership details for SAMPro are limited in the sources reviewed. DATABASICS’ public employee listings show staff and some names, but a definitive executive roster was not available in the reviewed material. - Funding and growth: investment rounds, acquisitions, estimated customer count/revenue if public - **Acquisition (SAMPro line):** Accessible sources indicate the SAMPro line was acquired by another software company in 2023. No purchase price was found in the accessible sources. - **Customer count / revenue:** Not publicly documented in the sources accessed. - **DATABASICS (time & expense) integration volume claim:** The vendor states there are hundreds of integrations completed. This claim was not independently validated in the material reviewed and should be verified during procurement. - Pricing model with specific tiers and costs where available - **SAMPro Enterprise ERP** - Pricing is not publicly listed on the SAMPro pages accessed; the product appears sales-led and requires contacting sales for a quote. - **DATABASICS (time & expense) — published pricing** - The vendor publishes a pricing page with a published starting monthly price described as intended for mid-sized teams, and additional plan tiers (Core/Enterprise) with a feature matrix. - The pricing page notes a stated bundle discount when subscribing to both Time Tracking and Expense Reporting. - Third-party directories sometimes normalize pricing into per-user figures; these normalized figures can be misleading because they may not account for minimums, modules, and implementation fees (e.g., some directories show a low per-user starting estimate that appears to be an estimate rather than an official contractual quote). - Total cost of ownership (TCO) considerations (implementation, training, hidden costs) - For **SAMPro ERP** - Expected TCO drivers (based on ERP category norms and vendor material): implementation services, data migration, workflow configuration, reporting/analytics setup, and ongoing support/upgrades. - The vendor highlights implementation services and ongoing support as part of the offering; no public price list for these services was found. - For **DATABASICS time & expense** - The vendor indicates customized pricing depending on volumes, integrations, and modules (time, expense, P-card, etc.). - Some reviews mention additional costs associated with updates, suggesting potential change-management costs for administrators. - Key competitors in the space (list 4-6 direct alternatives) - **SAMPro ERP (field service and construction ERP)** - Likely competitor set includes ServiceTitan (mid-market), Oracle NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics, and construction ERPs such as Viewpoint/Trimble, Sage construction products, and Jonas-family products. Not all competitors were verified via the sources reviewed. - **DATABASICS (time & expense / spend)** - Common alternatives mentioned across sources include SAP Concur, Expensify, Emburse products, Ramp, Rippling, and previously Nexonia.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Data-Basics including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →