Deep ESG

Name: Deep ESG
Brand: Deep ESG

AI Native

Solutions that provide calculation methods to generate reliable, consistent, and widely accepted ESG disclosures

Est 2020|Raised $11.2M

LinkedIn 36K|Web traffic 3K|FTEs 250|HQ São José dos Campos, São Paulo, BR

Published Jul 14, 2026

01Common complaints

1) If procurement requires published security attestations - Public materials reviewed did not document SOC 2 or ISO certifications. Organizations that require these attestations as part of procurement should consider vendors that publish these certifications or should require the vendor to provide them prior to contracting. 2) If price transparency or self-serve onboarding is a priority - Deep ESG appears to use a demo- and quote-based sales model; organizations seeking immediate self-serve onboarding or clearly published pricing may prefer alternatives with public pricing tiers. 3) If extensive global peer references are required - Deep ESG has fewer publicly visible customer reviews and independent analyst coverage than larger global platforms; organizations that require abundant public references should validate references and request case details. 4) If the primary need is comprehensive EU CSRD/ESRS compliance tooling - Vendors with explicit, well-documented CSRD/ESRS workflows may better match EU regulatory needs; Deep ESG should be validated for ESRS specifics during procurement.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations that require publicly available SOC 2 / ISO 27001 evidence prior to engagement.
Organizations that require extensive third-party product reviews and a broad marketplace presence for vendor assessment.
Organizations whose primary regulatory need is EU CSRD/ESRS processing and who require an established platform with extensive ESRS workflows and public proof in that context.

Publicly visible limitations

Security and compliance documentation is not publicly available in the materials reviewed; this is a gating factor for many enterprise buyers.
Limited public product reviews and marketplace presence reduce the availability of independent user feedback about usability, data quality, and support.
Several case studies and detailed examples are gated behind forms, limiting the ability to independently assess claimed outcomes.

Roadmap (public)

No reliable public product roadmap with dates was located in the reviewed sources.

02Why they buy

Unique selling points supported by available evidence

- ERP and accounting data integration as a primary design focus: Partner and product pages describe integration with ERP systems (notably TOTVS) and workflows that intake accounting/tax data for inventory creation. - Traceability and audit-support features: Descriptions on vendor and partner pages reference views or tabs intended to support evidence collection and audit processes. - Reported acceleration of inventory preparation when accounting-driven automation applies: Partner case materials report shorter cycle times for GHG inventory creation compared with manual processes.

Where competitors have clear advantages

Published security/compliance attestations and broader review footprints are more visible for several competing platforms (e.g., Persefoni).

03Field reports

Important limitation: limited coverage on mainstream SaaS review platforms

Deep ESG has limited presence on major B2B review platforms based on searches performed; no substantive product review pages were surfaced in the referenced searches. This reduces third-party user-voice visibility compared with larger competitors.

Employee reviews (Glassdoor) — operational signals

Glassdoor feedback is not product feedback, but it provides signals about operational maturity, support capacity, and delivery risk. Representative comments (employee perspective): - Positive employee comments reference a learning environment, flexibility, and opportunities to contribute. - Critical employee comments reference tight deadlines, occasional weekend/holiday work, compensation concerns, and perceived gaps in organizational transparency and empathy in management. Implication: Employee reports indicating organizational or process immaturity can correlate with inconsistent implementation experiences, variable support response, or reliance on ad-hoc delivery methods.

Partner/customer-facing testimonials (vendor/partner materials)

A vendor case write-up with a regional energy company describes automation of carbon inventories from accounting data and reduced preparation time.
Partner ERP product pages describe workflow changes intended to replace spreadsheet-based data collection and to provide recurring standardized indicators and audit support.

Caution: Partner and vendor case materials are vendor-supplied descriptions and are not independent customer reviews.

1) "Decarbonization Journey" (regional energy client + vendor)

What is claimed: - Automation of GHG inventories from accounting/tax file inputs, aligned with GHG Protocol. - Reported reduction in inventory preparation time relative to a manual baseline. Critical evaluation: - The case is published on a partner page; baseline definitions, customer mix, and counting methodology for inventories are not publicly documented or independently audited in the available materials. - The case indicates a vendor capability to ingest accounting data and accelerate inventory creation relative to a manual baseline.

2) Construction/real-estate sector case study

What is described (high level): - Delivery of a customized carbon inventory solution tailored for construction-sector reporting requirements to support participation in a market sustainability index. Critical evaluation: - Full details are gated behind a form, limiting independent review of outcomes and measured impact. - The scope suggests the vendor can provide customizations beyond a standard SaaS deployment, which can increase reliance on professional services.

3) Multi-site industrial case study

What is described (high level):

Integration of inventories across multiple business units into a single platform and monitoring of sustainability indicators aligned with organizational goals.

Critical evaluation:

Details are gated; the case suggests applicability to multi-site heavy industry, but specific outcomes and metrics are not publicly visible.

04Best fit

Company size

Likely strongest fit: mid-market to enterprise organizations (mid-sized to large organizations), particularly those with complex operations and multiple sites/units.
The vendor is also marketed to smaller companies in ecosystem listings, but publicly documented customer examples are more visible in larger partner contexts.

Industries/verticals (evidence-based examples)

From case pages and partner mentions:

Energy
Mining
Construction / real estate
Water and sanitation utilities
Manufacturing

Roles and personas

Sustainability / ESG managers
Finance leadership (due to accounting integration focus)
Operations leaders managing emissions-driving activities
Risk and compliance teams
IT / ERP owners (integration requirements)

Qualification criteria (strong fit)

Organizations with established ERP/accounting data discipline seeking to automate GHG inventory production.
Organizations that require traceability and recurring reporting workflows rather than one-off consultancy engagements.
Organizations operating primarily in Brazil/LatAm that value local partner channels and localized support.

05The pitch

What the product does (objective core value proposition)

Deep ESG is a B2B ESG management and carbon accounting software provider that supports measurement, management, and reporting of sustainability indicators—particularly greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories—by integrating ESG calculations with operational, accounting, and ERP data. Vendor materials describe features focused on traceability, consistent data formats, and reduction of manual data-collection tasks (spreadsheets, email-based data collection). A distribution/packaging arrangement of the product is available through a Brazilian ERP vendor as an integrated ESG system, positioned to produce standardized data for carbon inventories (Scopes 1–3) and sustainability reports aligned to common frameworks.

Target market and market positioning

- Primary geography: Brazil / Latin America-first; many public materials are in Portuguese and local partnerships are highlighted. - Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations that must produce ESG disclosures, carbon inventories, and audit-supporting reports, particularly those already using ERP systems and those subject to increasing regulatory or investor expectations. - Positioning theme: Integration of ESG and carbon accounting into operational systems and processes rather than one-off reporting projects.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Deep ESG including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →

Published Jul 14, 2026

01Common complaints

If procurement requires published security attestations

Public materials reviewed did not document SOC 2 or ISO certifications. Organizations that require these attestations as part of procurement should consider vendors that publish these certifications or should require the vendor to provide them prior to contracting.

If price transparency or self-serve onboarding is a priority

Deep ESG appears to use a demo- and quote-based sales model; organizations seeking immediate self-serve onboarding or clearly published pricing may prefer alternatives with public pricing tiers.

If extensive global peer references are required

Deep ESG has fewer publicly visible customer reviews and independent analyst coverage than larger global platforms; organizations that require abundant public references should validate references and request case details.

If the primary need is comprehensive EU CSRD/ESRS compliance tooling

Vendors with explicit, well-documented CSRD/ESRS workflows may better match EU regulatory needs; Deep ESG should be validated for ESRS specifics during procurement.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations that require publicly available SOC 2 / ISO 27001 evidence prior to engagement.
Organizations that require extensive third-party product reviews and a broad marketplace presence for vendor assessment.
Organizations whose primary regulatory need is EU CSRD/ESRS processing and who require an established platform with extensive ESRS workflows and public proof in that context.

Publicly visible limitations

Security and compliance documentation is not publicly available in the materials reviewed; this is a gating factor for many enterprise buyers.
Limited public product reviews and marketplace presence reduce the availability of independent user feedback about usability, data quality, and support.
Several case studies and detailed examples are gated behind forms, limiting the ability to independently assess claimed outcomes.

Roadmap (public)

No reliable public product roadmap with dates was located in the reviewed sources.

02Why they buy

Unique selling points supported by available evidence

ERP and accounting data integration as a primary design focus: Partner and product pages describe integration with ERP systems (notably TOTVS) and workflows that intake accounting/tax data for inventory creation.
Traceability and audit-support features: Descriptions on vendor and partner pages reference views or tabs intended to support evidence collection and audit processes.
Reported acceleration of inventory preparation when accounting-driven automation applies: Partner case materials report shorter cycle times for GHG inventory creation compared with manual processes.

Where competitors have clear advantages

Published security/compliance attestations and broader review footprints are more visible for several competing platforms (e.g., Persefoni).

03Field reports

Important limitation: limited coverage on mainstream SaaS review platforms

Employee reviews (Glassdoor) — operational signals

Glassdoor feedback is not product feedback, but it provides signals about operational maturity, support capacity, and delivery risk.

Representative comments (employee perspective):

Positive employee comments reference a learning environment, flexibility, and opportunities to contribute.
Critical employee comments reference tight deadlines, occasional weekend/holiday work, compensation concerns, and perceived gaps in organizational transparency and empathy in management.

Implication: Employee reports indicating organizational or process immaturity can correlate with inconsistent implementation experiences, variable support response, or reliance on ad-hoc delivery methods.

Partner/customer-facing testimonials (vendor/partner materials)

A vendor case write-up with a regional energy company describes automation of carbon inventories from accounting data and reduced preparation time.
Partner ERP product pages describe workflow changes intended to replace spreadsheet-based data collection and to provide recurring standardized indicators and audit support.

Caution: Partner and vendor case materials are vendor-supplied descriptions and are not independent customer reviews.

1) "Decarbonization Journey" (regional energy client + vendor)

What is claimed:

Automation of GHG inventories from accounting/tax file inputs, aligned with GHG Protocol.
Reported reduction in inventory preparation time relative to a manual baseline.

Critical evaluation:

The case is published on a partner page; baseline definitions, customer mix, and counting methodology for inventories are not publicly documented or independently audited in the available materials.
The case indicates a vendor capability to ingest accounting data and accelerate inventory creation relative to a manual baseline.

2) Construction/real-estate sector case study

What is described (high level):

Delivery of a customized carbon inventory solution tailored for construction-sector reporting requirements to support participation in a market sustainability index.

Critical evaluation:

Full details are gated behind a form, limiting independent review of outcomes and measured impact.
The scope suggests the vendor can provide customizations beyond a standard SaaS deployment, which can increase reliance on professional services.

3) Multi-site industrial case study

What is described (high level):

Integration of inventories across multiple business units into a single platform and monitoring of sustainability indicators aligned with organizational goals.

Critical evaluation:

Details are gated; the case suggests applicability to multi-site heavy industry, but specific outcomes and metrics are not publicly visible.

04Best fit

Company size

Likely strongest fit: mid-market to enterprise organizations (mid-sized to large organizations), particularly those with complex operations and multiple sites/units.
The vendor is also marketed to smaller companies in ecosystem listings, but publicly documented customer examples are more visible in larger partner contexts.

Industries/verticals (evidence-based examples)

From case pages and partner mentions:

Energy
Mining
Construction / real estate
Water and sanitation utilities
Manufacturing

Roles and personas

Sustainability / ESG managers
Finance leadership (due to accounting integration focus)
Operations leaders managing emissions-driving activities
Risk and compliance teams
IT / ERP owners (integration requirements)

Qualification criteria (strong fit)

Organizations with established ERP/accounting data discipline seeking to automate GHG inventory production.
Organizations that require traceability and recurring reporting workflows rather than one-off consultancy engagements.
Organizations operating primarily in Brazil/LatAm that value local partner channels and localized support.

05The pitch

What the product does (objective core value proposition)

A distribution/packaging arrangement of the product is available through a Brazilian ERP vendor as an integrated ESG system, positioned to produce standardized data for carbon inventories (Scopes 1–3) and sustainability reports aligned to common frameworks.

Target market and market positioning

Primary geography: Brazil / Latin America-first; many public materials are in Portuguese and local partnerships are highlighted.
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations that must produce ESG disclosures, carbon inventories, and audit-supporting reports, particularly those already using ERP systems and those subject to increasing regulatory or investor expectations.
Positioning theme: Integration of ESG and carbon accounting into operational systems and processes rather than one-off reporting projects.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Deep ESG including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →