Degreed

Name: Degreed
Brand: Degreed
Rating: 4.1 (122 reviews)

Leader

A technology suite that combines lifelong learning and data-driven development to accelerate workforce capabilities.

Est 2012|Valuation $1.4B|Raised $501.9M|128 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 82K|Web traffic 364K|FTEs 548|HQ Pleasanton, California, US

MarketsData Science & Machine Learning Platforms

Platform CoversCareer Pathing & Succession Planning Learning Management System (LMS)HR Analytics & Workforce Planning Sales Training & Learning Management Systems (LMS)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Degreed vs LMS-first suites - Degreed is frequently positioned as a learning experience and orchestration layer that can sit above existing LMS/HCM systems. - Community feedback highlights a limitation: if the LMS remains the content host and launch point, user frustration with LMS UX and course wrappers can persist. - Degreed vs 360Learning - Comparison summaries indicate 360Learning is often praised for user-friendliness and collaborative learning workflows, while Degreed receives mixed feedback on assessment robustness. - Degreed vs Workday Learning - Workday Learning is frequently evaluated by organizations standardized on Workday HCM, aiming to reduce vendor sprawl. - Community discussions show organizations actively scoping transitions from an LXP to Workday Learning for consolidation reasons; the tradeoff is ecosystem consolidation versus LXP specialization.

Market share and adoption trends

Independent, current market share data for LXPs is difficult to validate from public sources.
Industry analysis describes Degreed as an early entrant and a substantial provider in the LXP category, but this does not represent a precise market share metric.

	Degreed	Cornerstone Learning	Docebo
Starting Price	Not publicly transparent; typically quote-based enterprise pricing	Not consistently transparent; often enterprise quote-based	Pricing page exists but typically quote-based; plan structure published
Best For	Enterprises seeking an LXP/orchestration layer plus skills analytics across multiple systems	Enterprises seeking an LMS suite with compliance/training management integrated into a broader talent platform	Organizations seeking an LMS-focused platform with extensible modules for enterprise training
Key Strength	Ecosystem aggregation and orchestration; skills analytics and personalization across content sources	Strong LMS heritage, compliance/training management breadth	LMS configurability and enterprise usage across internal and extended enterprise scenarios
Key Weakness	May not remove underlying LMS pain points; key outcome claims are vendor-published and pricing is opaque	Can be complex and costly; migration and API costs are considerations	Pricing and packaging complexity; some capabilities may require additional modules

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Degreed vs LMS-first suites
- Degreed is frequently positioned as a learning experience and orchestration layer that can sit above existing LMS/HCM systems.
- Community feedback highlights a limitation: if the LMS remains the content host and launch point, user frustration with LMS UX and course wrappers can persist.
Degreed vs 360Learning
- Comparison summaries indicate 360Learning is often praised for user-friendliness and collaborative learning workflows, while Degreed receives mixed feedback on assessment robustness.
Degreed vs Workday Learning
- Workday Learning is frequently evaluated by organizations standardized on Workday HCM, aiming to reduce vendor sprawl.
- Community discussions show organizations actively scoping transitions from an LXP to Workday Learning for consolidation reasons; the tradeoff is ecosystem consolidation versus LXP specialization.

Market share and adoption trends

Independent, current market share data for LXPs is difficult to validate from public sources.
Industry analysis describes Degreed as an early entrant and a substantial provider in the LXP category, but this does not represent a precise market share metric.

	Degreed	Cornerstone Learning	Docebo
Starting Price	Not publicly transparent; typically quote-based enterprise pricing	Not consistently transparent; often enterprise quote-based	Pricing page exists but typically quote-based; plan structure published
Best For	Enterprises seeking an LXP/orchestration layer plus skills analytics across multiple systems	Enterprises seeking an LMS suite with compliance/training management integrated into a broader talent platform	Organizations seeking an LMS-focused platform with extensible modules for enterprise training
Key Strength	Ecosystem aggregation and orchestration; skills analytics and personalization across content sources	Strong LMS heritage, compliance/training management breadth	LMS configurability and enterprise usage across internal and extended enterprise scenarios
Key Weakness	May not remove underlying LMS pain points; key outcome claims are vendor-published and pricing is opaque	Can be complex and costly; migration and API costs are considerations	Pricing and packaging complexity; some capabilities may require additional modules