Delinea Fastpath Access Provisioning

Name: Delinea Fastpath Access Provisioning
Brand: Delinea
Rating: 4.7 (123 reviews)

Leader

Stop unauthorized access

Est 2004|Valuation $500M|Raised $181.5M

LinkedIn 47K|Website|Web traffic 170K|FTEs 1,340|HQ San Francisco, CA

MarketsIdentity Provider (IdP) & Single Sign-On (SSO)Identity Governance & Administration (IGA)

Delinea Fastpath Access Provisioning screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: where Fastpath tends to fit vs alternatives

- Fastpath and Pathlock both focus on SoD and application access governance for ERP/LoB systems. Pathlock emphasizes connector breadth and a platform approach; Fastpath emphasizes detailed permission-level analysis and audit-oriented workflows. - Saviynt and SailPoint are broader IGA platforms often chosen as program anchors for enterprise-wide identity lifecycle management. Fastpath is a candidate when the primary pain points are SOX/ERP access controls and audit evidence, or when organizations prefer a specialized application access governance layer. - Microsoft Entra ID Governance may be attractive for Microsoft-centric deployments, but it is typically less feature-rich for heterogeneous ERP/LoB application governance.

Market share / adoption trends

Third-party site metrics and "mindshare" figures should be treated cautiously; they reflect platform activity and a site’s methodology rather than audited market share.

	Delinea Fastpath Access Provisioning	Pathlock (Application Access Governance)	Saviynt (Identity Cloud / App Access Governance)
Starting Price	Quote-based (request vendor for pricing)	Quote-based	Quote-based
Best Fit	Audit-driven application provisioning with integrated SoD checks for ERP/line-of-business apps	Cross-application access governance with broad connector coverage	Large enterprises seeking program-level IGA and application access governance
Key Strength	Preventative SoD checks built into provisioning workflows and a focus on audit evidence and control processes	Broad connector messaging and unified governance approach	Broad identity governance scope and consolidation potential for large identity programs
Key Weakness	Reported reviewer concerns about reporting flexibility and some feature gaps; limited public pricing transparency	Vendor marketing claims require independent validation; user sentiment not exhaustively reviewed here	Implementation and operational complexity reported by some practitioners; support and configuration overhead can be significant

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: where Fastpath tends to fit vs alternatives

Fastpath and Pathlock both focus on SoD and application access governance for ERP/LoB systems. Pathlock emphasizes connector breadth and a platform approach; Fastpath emphasizes detailed permission-level analysis and audit-oriented workflows.
Saviynt and SailPoint are broader IGA platforms often chosen as program anchors for enterprise-wide identity lifecycle management. Fastpath is a candidate when the primary pain points are SOX/ERP access controls and audit evidence, or when organizations prefer a specialized application access governance layer.
Microsoft Entra ID Governance may be attractive for Microsoft-centric deployments, but it is typically less feature-rich for heterogeneous ERP/LoB application governance.

Market share / adoption trends

Third-party site metrics and "mindshare" figures should be treated cautiously; they reflect platform activity and a site’s methodology rather than audited market share.

	Delinea Fastpath Access Provisioning	Pathlock (Application Access Governance)	Saviynt (Identity Cloud / App Access Governance)
Starting Price	Quote-based (request vendor for pricing)	Quote-based	Quote-based
Best Fit	Audit-driven application provisioning with integrated SoD checks for ERP/line-of-business apps	Cross-application access governance with broad connector coverage	Large enterprises seeking program-level IGA and application access governance
Key Strength	Preventative SoD checks built into provisioning workflows and a focus on audit evidence and control processes	Broad connector messaging and unified governance approach	Broad identity governance scope and consolidation potential for large identity programs
Key Weakness	Reported reviewer concerns about reporting flexibility and some feature gaps; limited public pricing transparency	Vendor marketing claims require independent validation; user sentiment not exhaustively reviewed here	Implementation and operational complexity reported by some practitioners; support and configuration overhead can be significant