Delinea Fastpath Access Review

Name: Delinea Fastpath Access Review
Brand: Delinea
Rating: 4.7 (123 reviews)

Leader

Stop unauthorized access

Est 2004|Valuation $500M|Raised $181.5M

LinkedIn 47K|Website|Web traffic 170K|FTEs 1,340|HQ San Francisco, CA

MarketsInternal Controls & Audit Management Identity Provider (IdP) & Single Sign-On (SSO)Identity Governance & Administration (IGA)Board Reporting for Audit & Internal Controls

Delinea Fastpath Access Review screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Fastpath Access Review versus full IGA suites (e.g., SailPoint, Saviynt): - Comparison data indicates Fastpath may rate higher in ease-of-use and support in some reviewer contexts, while larger IGA vendors provide broader lifecycle governance and a larger enterprise ecosystem. - Where the primary objective is cross-application access certification for ERP-style permissions, Fastpath’s product heritage can align to that use case. Buyers should validate connector coverage and entitlement modeling for each target application. Fastpath Access Review versus Pathlock / SafePaaS: - Pathlock and SafePaaS emphasize continuous controls, SoD, and audit analytics for ERP environments. - Pathlock has publicly accessible procurement pricing examples in some procurement channels, which can simplify early-stage budgeting compared with vendors that do not publish list pricing. Reasons organizations select competitors instead (common reasons): - Need for a full IGA suite with deep lifecycle processes and broader SaaS coverage - Requirement for clearer, published pricing or procurement-friendly rate cards - Preference for a Microsoft-native governance stack for simpler Entra-based access reviews when requirements are modest

	Fastpath Access Review (Delinea)	SailPoint Identity Security Cloud	Pathlock (Application Access Governance)
Starting Price	Published pricing not generally listed; pricing is typically quote-based	Published pricing not generally listed; pricing is typically quote-based	Public procurement examples show published pricing tiers in some procurement channels
Recommended for	ERP/HCM/CRM-centric access certifications and audit evidence across business apps	Broad enterprise IGA (lifecycle governance across many apps)	Compliance-centric application access governance (ERP controls, SoD, continuous controls monitoring)
Key Strength	Application access governance orientation (SoD, certifications, audit workflows); positive review signals in some sources	Depth and breadth of IGA features and market adoption	Strong compliance framing; published pricing examples in some procurement channels
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; integration and reporting criticism appears in some review themes	Can be complex and resource-intensive to implement; often requires professional services	May be ERP/compliance-focused; buyers should validate connector depth for specific SaaS mixes

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Fastpath Access Review versus full IGA suites (e.g., SailPoint, Saviynt):

Comparison data indicates Fastpath may rate higher in ease-of-use and support in some reviewer contexts, while larger IGA vendors provide broader lifecycle governance and a larger enterprise ecosystem.
Where the primary objective is cross-application access certification for ERP-style permissions, Fastpath’s product heritage can align to that use case. Buyers should validate connector coverage and entitlement modeling for each target application.

Fastpath Access Review versus Pathlock / SafePaaS:

Pathlock and SafePaaS emphasize continuous controls, SoD, and audit analytics for ERP environments.
Pathlock has publicly accessible procurement pricing examples in some procurement channels, which can simplify early-stage budgeting compared with vendors that do not publish list pricing.

Reasons organizations select competitors instead (common reasons):

Need for a full IGA suite with deep lifecycle processes and broader SaaS coverage
Requirement for clearer, published pricing or procurement-friendly rate cards
Preference for a Microsoft-native governance stack for simpler Entra-based access reviews when requirements are modest

	Fastpath Access Review (Delinea)	SailPoint Identity Security Cloud	Pathlock (Application Access Governance)
Starting Price	Published pricing not generally listed; pricing is typically quote-based	Published pricing not generally listed; pricing is typically quote-based	Public procurement examples show published pricing tiers in some procurement channels
Recommended for	ERP/HCM/CRM-centric access certifications and audit evidence across business apps	Broad enterprise IGA (lifecycle governance across many apps)	Compliance-centric application access governance (ERP controls, SoD, continuous controls monitoring)
Key Strength	Application access governance orientation (SoD, certifications, audit workflows); positive review signals in some sources	Depth and breadth of IGA features and market adoption	Strong compliance framing; published pricing examples in some procurement channels
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; integration and reporting criticism appears in some review themes	Can be complex and resource-intensive to implement; often requires professional services	May be ERP/compliance-focused; buyers should validate connector depth for specific SaaS mixes