DisasterAware Enterprise

Name: DisasterAware Enterprise
Brand: Disaster Aware

AI Native

Risk Intelligence Platform allows Enterprise to plan, monitor and respond to natural & geopolitical hazards in real-time

Est 2023|Valuation $9.8M|Raised $94.1M|9 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 751|Web traffic 22K|FTEs 6|HQ Santa Clara, California, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where DisasterAWARE's strengths appear to be: - Geospatial-first hazard monitoring with multiple overlay layers and many hazard types. - A dual delivery model (SaaS plus DaaS/API) that supports embedding hazard intelligence into customer applications. - Origins in disaster management and links to the Pacific Disaster Center and related partners. Where competitors may present clearer procurement advantages: - Everbridge and associated offerings may provide a more complete incident communications and employee outreach capability and may more prominently reference compliance artifacts in public materials. - Dataminr may detect a broader range of emergent incidents from social and open web sources and may offer explicit marketplace pricing for certain products. Market adoption signals: - DisasterAWARE has enterprise integrations referenced in vendor case studies (for example, an insurance-related firm and a travel risk provider), but public user review density is low. - Competing platforms have broader public footprints and more independently verifiable customer feedback.

	DisasterAWARE Enterprise	Everbridge (Risk Intelligence / CEM ecosystem)	Dataminr (First Alert / Pulse)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed	Not publicly listed; pricing varies by product and scale	Some published SKUs list explicit pricing on marketplaces for specific packages
Primary use cases	Hazard-focused early warning and geospatial intelligence; embedding hazard data via API	End-to-end CEM with communications and analyst monitoring centers	Real-time detection from open sources with alerting for security and intelligence teams
Key strength	Broad hazard coverage, many geospatial overlays, and support for integration standards	Mature enterprise platform with integrated communications and incident workflows; extensive enterprise customer base	Fast detection of breaking events from social and web sources; marketplace procurement options for some SKUs
Key weakness	Limited independent user reviews; limited public documentation of security/compliance posture; pricing not transparent	Platform complexity and potentially high cost for limited-use cases	Less emphasis on detailed hazard modeling compared with hazard-specialist platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where DisasterAWARE's strengths appear to be:

Geospatial-first hazard monitoring with multiple overlay layers and many hazard types.
A dual delivery model (SaaS plus DaaS/API) that supports embedding hazard intelligence into customer applications.
Origins in disaster management and links to the Pacific Disaster Center and related partners.

Where competitors may present clearer procurement advantages:

Everbridge and associated offerings may provide a more complete incident communications and employee outreach capability and may more prominently reference compliance artifacts in public materials.
Dataminr may detect a broader range of emergent incidents from social and open web sources and may offer explicit marketplace pricing for certain products.

Market adoption signals:

DisasterAWARE has enterprise integrations referenced in vendor case studies (for example, an insurance-related firm and a travel risk provider), but public user review density is low.
Competing platforms have broader public footprints and more independently verifiable customer feedback.

	DisasterAWARE Enterprise	Everbridge (Risk Intelligence / CEM ecosystem)	Dataminr (First Alert / Pulse)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed	Not publicly listed; pricing varies by product and scale	Some published SKUs list explicit pricing on marketplaces for specific packages
Primary use cases	Hazard-focused early warning and geospatial intelligence; embedding hazard data via API	End-to-end CEM with communications and analyst monitoring centers	Real-time detection from open sources with alerting for security and intelligence teams
Key strength	Broad hazard coverage, many geospatial overlays, and support for integration standards	Mature enterprise platform with integrated communications and incident workflows; extensive enterprise customer base	Fast detection of breaking events from social and web sources; marketplace procurement options for some SKUs
Key weakness	Limited independent user reviews; limited public documentation of security/compliance posture; pricing not transparent	Platform complexity and potentially high cost for limited-use cases	Less emphasis on detailed hazard modeling compared with hazard-specialist platforms

DisasterAware Enterprise

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map