Disaster Tech
Crisis management software for intelligence, planning, operations, logistics, and readiness.
Est 2019|Valuation $113M|Raised $15.5M
Published Sep 19, 2026
Explicit churn narratives were not found in the captured sources. Recurring friction points that often contribute to churn in this category include:
TrustRadius lists DisasterLAN and provides product positioning text. The captured page did not provide extensive verbatim review excerpts in the snippet, but it supports the existence of an enterprise review footprint beyond other platforms.
PRATUS is listed in Microsoft’s marketplace and appears very highly rated there, but the marketplace signal is based on a limited review volume and is not statistically meaningful.
Across DLAN reviews, typical buying drivers include:
Vendor materials describe a consolidated operational view for incident and exercise management, AI-assisted generation of SITREPs and after-action reporting, and procurement via contract vehicles and channel partners.
However, independently verified, quantified case studies (for example, specific measured reductions in incident response time) were not found in the captured sources.
Best fit appears to be mid-market to enterprise organizations, including public sector agencies and critical infrastructure operators with formal incident and exercise programs.
Decision makers:
End users:
Get a comprehensive analysis of Disaster Tech including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.
Download full report →Requirement for independently validated security certifications (SOC 2 Type II / ISO 27001) as a procurement hard gate
Need for a mature standalone EOC platform with deep legacy ecosystem integration
Need for transparent, self-serve pricing and rapid SMB deployment
Organizations that are not Microsoft Teams-centric
A key limitation: PRATUS itself has a limited third-party review footprint on mainstream review platforms in the results reviewed. By contrast, DisasterLAN (DLAN) — associated with Buffalo Computer Graphics — has a more substantial set of reviews on major review sites.
As a result, this section uses:
G2 shows DisasterLAN with a favorable overall rating and a review distribution dominated by positive reviews in the data captured.
Positive example:
Negative example:
This pattern aligns with common category trade-offs: vendor support can be strong, while operational friction and technical edge cases are reported.
Capterra reviews include both positive and critical feedback. One detailed review highlighted:
Positive example:
Capterra also labels some reviews as vendor-referred with an incentive, which is important context when weighing sentiment.
Disaster Tech announced integration of a third-party AI forecasting model into PRATUS for tropical cyclone track guidance. The press materials reference peer-reviewed model improvements reported by the forecasting provider.
Observations:
Critical note: model performance improvements do not automatically translate into operational outcomes without appropriate training, SOP integration, and governance.
Disaster Tech is a crisis management and operational readiness software vendor whose flagship product PRATUS is a Microsoft 365 / Microsoft Teams–integrated incident management, situational awareness, and training & exercise management platform. PRATUS provides a Teams- and SharePoint-centered operating surface for incident coordination, includes AI-assisted decision support (example feature names: DisasterGPT/DisasterChat), ingests real-time data feeds (weather, etc.), and implements collaboration workflows inside Microsoft 365 rather than requiring users to adopt a separate standalone tool.
In parallel, the broader DisasterLAN (DLAN) product line is associated with Buffalo Computer Graphics and appears on major review platforms as a long-running incident management solution.
Based on vendor materials and channel partnerships, Disaster Tech targets:
The vendor positions PRATUS as designed by practitioners to reduce communication fragmentation through Teams-native collaboration and automation.