DisruptOps

Name: DisruptOps
Brand: DisruptOps

Our cloud security operations platform helps customers find & fix security issues before they become incidents.

Est 2014|Valuation $29M|Raised $12.8M|2 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Website|FTEs 26|HQ Kansas City, Missouri, US

MarketsCloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- DisruptOps/Cloud Defense differentiator: emphasis on security operations workflows (assigning responsibility and routing actions) and near-real-time change history with identity attribution. This is potentially useful where coordinating remediation across many teams is a primary challenge. - Where CNAPP suites often win: buyers seeking a single platform that spans posture, vulnerability management, workload protection, container/Kubernetes security, and attack-path prioritization may prefer vendors such as Wiz, Prisma Cloud, or Orca. - Pricing comparison: Cloud Defense’s public per-account pricing in the hundreds-per-account-per-month range may be compelling for small-to-midsize multi-account environments; at large account counts, resource-based or enterprise licensing models may be more cost-effective.

Market adoption and brand momentum

DisruptOps is no longer marketed as a standalone startup; it is part of FireMon’s product portfolio post-acquisition. Market momentum for the offering will therefore be influenced by FireMon’s execution and Cloud Defense positioning.

	DisruptOps / FireMon Cloud Defense	Wiz	Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Starting Price	Per-account pricing in the hundreds per account per month (Pro)	Not publicly listed (sales-led)	Varies by plan/resource; usage-based and per-component pricing applies
Primary use case	Teams seeking near-real-time posture, change history, and workflow/ChatOps-driven remediation across distributed cloud owners	Organizations prioritizing broad CNAPP coverage with agentless visibility and risk graph/attack path analysis	Microsoft-centric environments that prefer native integrations across Azure and Microsoft security products
Key Strength	Public per-account pricing; real-time inventory and change tracking; workflow and ChatOps integration for distributed response	Broad visibility and prioritization; risk graph and attack-path analysis capabilities	Deep integration with Microsoft cloud services and governance tools
Key Weakness	Potential alert sensitivity/noise; limited public independent ROI evidence; per-account cost scaling	Perception of premium pricing and potential overlap with existing tools	Complexity and potential cost depending on enabled capabilities; multi-cloud depth varies by feature

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

DisruptOps/Cloud Defense differentiator: emphasis on security operations workflows (assigning responsibility and routing actions) and near-real-time change history with identity attribution. This is potentially useful where coordinating remediation across many teams is a primary challenge.
Where CNAPP suites often win: buyers seeking a single platform that spans posture, vulnerability management, workload protection, container/Kubernetes security, and attack-path prioritization may prefer vendors such as Wiz, Prisma Cloud, or Orca.
Pricing comparison: Cloud Defense’s public per-account pricing in the hundreds-per-account-per-month range may be compelling for small-to-midsize multi-account environments; at large account counts, resource-based or enterprise licensing models may be more cost-effective.

Market adoption and brand momentum

	DisruptOps / FireMon Cloud Defense	Wiz	Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Starting Price	Per-account pricing in the hundreds per account per month (Pro)	Not publicly listed (sales-led)	Varies by plan/resource; usage-based and per-component pricing applies
Primary use case	Teams seeking near-real-time posture, change history, and workflow/ChatOps-driven remediation across distributed cloud owners	Organizations prioritizing broad CNAPP coverage with agentless visibility and risk graph/attack path analysis	Microsoft-centric environments that prefer native integrations across Azure and Microsoft security products
Key Strength	Public per-account pricing; real-time inventory and change tracking; workflow and ChatOps integration for distributed response	Broad visibility and prioritization; risk graph and attack-path analysis capabilities	Deep integration with Microsoft cloud services and governance tools
Key Weakness	Potential alert sensitivity/noise; limited public independent ROI evidence; per-account cost scaling	Perception of premium pricing and potential overlap with existing tools	Complexity and potential cost depending on enabled capabilities; multi-cloud depth varies by feature