DojoMojo

Name: DojoMojo
Brand: DojoMojo
Rating: 3.8 (6 reviews)

The home of giveaway audience growth

Est 2015|Valuation $40M|Raised $26M|139 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 767|Website|Web traffic 507K|FTEs 7|HQ New York, New York, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where DojoMojo is differentiated - Partnership marketplace and workflows: reviewer feedback and vendor materials indicate tools for finding partner brands and coordinating co-marketing sweepstakes, which differs from many standalone contest builders. - Partnership governance features: help documentation references partnership agreements, expectations, and features such as split traffic controls for post-entry conversion opportunities. Where competitors can be stronger - General-purpose giveaway builders (ShortStack, Gleam, Woobox, ViralSweep) may offer more flexible editors, broader embed/publishing options, or simpler self-serve flows without partnership coordination overhead. - Privy and similar on-site capture tools may provide more predictable, always-on list growth compared with episodic giveaway acquisition. Pricing/value comparison - DojoMojo’s commonly cited published starting monthly price positions it in a mid-tier segment among contest tools. - ShortStack lists a lower entry-level price but scales based on stored-entry limits. - Gleam offers lower entry-level plans in some categories but comprehensive needs may require higher bundles. Adoption/market share signals - Technographic estimates place DojoMojo as a niche provider within the promotional marketing category; vendor and press claims indicate a larger network, but the methodology and recency of those claims should be validated.

	DojoMojo	ShortStack	Gleam (Competitions/Package)
Starting Price	Published starting monthly price in vendor listings; published per-credit SMS pricing available from the vendor	Published entry-level monthly price listed by the vendor	Published entry-level competition pricing and bundled plan pricing available from the vendor
Best For	Brands conducting partner sweepstakes and using a marketplace for co-marketing; includes an SMS suite option	Teams needing flexible contest templates and controlled lead storage limits	Broad giveaway and capture tooling used by creators and brands; modular app approach
Key Strength	Marketplace for partner discovery and coordination; partnership governance features	Clear pricing tiers; mature promotion tooling; fraud prevention at higher tiers	Broad feature set across competitions/capture/rewards; flexible subscription
Key Weakness	Some reviewers cite lead-quality variability and occasional billing complaints (limited sample); landing-page UX concerns; limited publicly available enterprise security documentation	Pricing tied to stored entry limits; higher tiers required for fraud prevention; may need custom styling for advanced designs	Complexity across modular apps; pricing depends on selected apps/tier; not a dedicated partnership marketplace

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where DojoMojo is differentiated

Partnership marketplace and workflows: reviewer feedback and vendor materials indicate tools for finding partner brands and coordinating co-marketing sweepstakes, which differs from many standalone contest builders.
Partnership governance features: help documentation references partnership agreements, expectations, and features such as split traffic controls for post-entry conversion opportunities.

Where competitors can be stronger

General-purpose giveaway builders (ShortStack, Gleam, Woobox, ViralSweep) may offer more flexible editors, broader embed/publishing options, or simpler self-serve flows without partnership coordination overhead.
Privy and similar on-site capture tools may provide more predictable, always-on list growth compared with episodic giveaway acquisition.

Pricing/value comparison

DojoMojo’s commonly cited published starting monthly price positions it in a mid-tier segment among contest tools.
ShortStack lists a lower entry-level price but scales based on stored-entry limits.
Gleam offers lower entry-level plans in some categories but comprehensive needs may require higher bundles.

Adoption/market share signals

Technographic estimates place DojoMojo as a niche provider within the promotional marketing category; vendor and press claims indicate a larger network, but the methodology and recency of those claims should be validated.

	DojoMojo	ShortStack	Gleam (Competitions/Package)
Starting Price	Published starting monthly price in vendor listings; published per-credit SMS pricing available from the vendor	Published entry-level monthly price listed by the vendor	Published entry-level competition pricing and bundled plan pricing available from the vendor
Best For	Brands conducting partner sweepstakes and using a marketplace for co-marketing; includes an SMS suite option	Teams needing flexible contest templates and controlled lead storage limits	Broad giveaway and capture tooling used by creators and brands; modular app approach
Key Strength	Marketplace for partner discovery and coordination; partnership governance features	Clear pricing tiers; mature promotion tooling; fraud prevention at higher tiers	Broad feature set across competitions/capture/rewards; flexible subscription
Key Weakness	Some reviewers cite lead-quality variability and occasional billing complaints (limited sample); landing-page UX concerns; limited publicly available enterprise security documentation	Pricing tied to stored entry limits; higher tiers required for fraud prevention; may need custom styling for advanced designs	Complexity across modular apps; pricing depends on selected apps/tier; not a dedicated partnership marketplace

DojoMojo

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map