Dubb

Name: Dubb
Brand: Dubb
Rating: 4.6 (731 reviews)

Dubb is a B2B video messaging and video-sales platform that records personalized webcam and screen videos, distributes them via email/SMS/LinkedIn, and directs viewers to branded landing pages with calls-to-action while providing engagement analytics and outbound campaign workflows.

Est 2017|31 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 3K|Web traffic 74K|FTEs 32

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitor analysis

Dubb vs Loom - Comparison data indicates Loom generally rates higher on ease of use; Dubb scores higher on customization/branding and some analytics features. - If the objective is internal async updates, product walkthroughs, or rapid rollout, Loom is typically a simpler and lower-cost option. - If the objective is outbound conversion with CTAs, branded pages, and CRM-integrated view tracking, Dubb is oriented toward sales operations. Dubb vs OneMob - OneMob emphasizes microsites, engagement analytics, and explicit enterprise security messaging. - Pricing is similar at mid-tier per-user levels. If security documentation is required for procurement, OneMob may be easier to approve based on public statements. Dubb vs Vidyard - Vidyard provides free tiers and plans targeted at revenue teams; published pricing emphasizes analytics, CTAs, and enterprise features such as SSO on higher tiers. - Vidyard is often perceived as more established for enterprise video workflows and may be stronger for larger teams requiring governance and security features.

	Dubb	Loom	OneMob
Starting Price	Free starter tier; paid per-user mid-tier and higher-tier plans	Free starter tier; paid business/annual billing options	Free starter tier; paid per-user plans at comparable mid-tier levels
Best For	Sales/marketing teams seeking branded video pages, CTAs, tracking, and outreach workflows	Simple async video and internal communications with rapid adoption	Sales teams needing video microsites and engagement tracking; vendors that publish enterprise security messaging
Key Strength	Landing pages with CTAs, viewer tracking, and a broad feature set oriented to sales workflows	Ease of use and mainstream adoption; fast rollout for internal use	Microsite-style pages and engagement tracking; explicit enterprise security messaging
Key Weakness	Interface complexity; reported editing and recording edge-case issues; limited publicly documented security certifications	Less deep customization for sales funnel use cases; fewer CTA/landing page features	Smaller market presence than some competitors; operational enablement may be required

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitor analysis

Dubb vs Loom

Comparison data indicates Loom generally rates higher on ease of use; Dubb scores higher on customization/branding and some analytics features.
If the objective is internal async updates, product walkthroughs, or rapid rollout, Loom is typically a simpler and lower-cost option.
If the objective is outbound conversion with CTAs, branded pages, and CRM-integrated view tracking, Dubb is oriented toward sales operations.

Dubb vs OneMob

OneMob emphasizes microsites, engagement analytics, and explicit enterprise security messaging.
Pricing is similar at mid-tier per-user levels. If security documentation is required for procurement, OneMob may be easier to approve based on public statements.

Dubb vs Vidyard

Vidyard provides free tiers and plans targeted at revenue teams; published pricing emphasizes analytics, CTAs, and enterprise features such as SSO on higher tiers.
Vidyard is often perceived as more established for enterprise video workflows and may be stronger for larger teams requiring governance and security features.

	Dubb	Loom	OneMob
Starting Price	Free starter tier; paid per-user mid-tier and higher-tier plans	Free starter tier; paid business/annual billing options	Free starter tier; paid per-user plans at comparable mid-tier levels
Best For	Sales/marketing teams seeking branded video pages, CTAs, tracking, and outreach workflows	Simple async video and internal communications with rapid adoption	Sales teams needing video microsites and engagement tracking; vendors that publish enterprise security messaging
Key Strength	Landing pages with CTAs, viewer tracking, and a broad feature set oriented to sales workflows	Ease of use and mainstream adoption; fast rollout for internal use	Microsite-style pages and engagement tracking; explicit enterprise security messaging
Key Weakness	Interface complexity; reported editing and recording edge-case issues; limited publicly documented security certifications	Less deep customization for sales funnel use cases; fewer CTA/landing page features	Smaller market presence than some competitors; operational enablement may be required

Dubb

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitor analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitor analysis

02Market Map