Eclypsium

Name: Eclypsium
Brand: Eclypsium
Rating: 4 (1 reviews)

Supply chain security for enterprise infrastructure. Defending the foundation of the enterprise

Est 2017|Valuation $105M|Raised $119.2M|16 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 7K|Web traffic 10K|FTEs 131|HQ Portland, OR

MarketsVulnerability Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Eclypsium vs. Binarly: both vendors emphasize firmware and supply chain topics. Binarly emphasizes firmware vulnerability disclosure and transparency; Eclypsium emphasizes enterprise fleet coverage, integrity verification, and operational response. - Eclypsium vs. Finite State: Finite State emphasizes SBOM/VEX and product lifecycle vulnerability management; Eclypsium focuses on enterprise infrastructure devices (servers, endpoints, network gear) and below-OS integrity. - Eclypsium vs. CNAPP/EDR platforms: CNAPP/EDR tools are not firmware-first but may win deals due to platform consolidation, broader feature sets, and larger review footprints.

Market adoption and trend indicators

The vendor has described expansion into AI data center / GPU infrastructure security in product announcements.
Funding events and press coverage indicate investor interest and vendor growth claims, subject to independent validation.

	Eclypsium	Binarly	Finite State
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (sales-led)	Not clearly listed on main site (sales-led)	Not publicly listed (sales-led)
Best For	Enterprises needing below-OS firmware/infrastructure integrity monitoring across endpoints/servers/network devices	Organizations emphasizing firmware transparency and large-scale firmware/vulnerability disclosure expertise	Product security teams needing SBOM/VEX, continuous monitoring, and compliance readiness for shipped products
Key Strength	Focus on infrastructure-level supply chain coverage; integrity, vulnerability, and threat detection for enterprise assets	Firmware vulnerability research and transparency platform positioning	SBOM/VEX workflows, continuous monitoring, and product security/compliance reporting
Key Weakness	Sparse independent reviews; public compliance posture and pricing information not clearly documented	Public pricing and deployment details not transparent; orientation may be more product-security focused	Less directly focused on enterprise fleet firmware integrity for internal IT assets (more product supply chain oriented)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Eclypsium vs. Binarly: both vendors emphasize firmware and supply chain topics. Binarly emphasizes firmware vulnerability disclosure and transparency; Eclypsium emphasizes enterprise fleet coverage, integrity verification, and operational response.
Eclypsium vs. Finite State: Finite State emphasizes SBOM/VEX and product lifecycle vulnerability management; Eclypsium focuses on enterprise infrastructure devices (servers, endpoints, network gear) and below-OS integrity.
Eclypsium vs. CNAPP/EDR platforms: CNAPP/EDR tools are not firmware-first but may win deals due to platform consolidation, broader feature sets, and larger review footprints.

Market adoption and trend indicators

The vendor has described expansion into AI data center / GPU infrastructure security in product announcements.
Funding events and press coverage indicate investor interest and vendor growth claims, subject to independent validation.

	Eclypsium	Binarly	Finite State
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (sales-led)	Not clearly listed on main site (sales-led)	Not publicly listed (sales-led)
Best For	Enterprises needing below-OS firmware/infrastructure integrity monitoring across endpoints/servers/network devices	Organizations emphasizing firmware transparency and large-scale firmware/vulnerability disclosure expertise	Product security teams needing SBOM/VEX, continuous monitoring, and compliance readiness for shipped products
Key Strength	Focus on infrastructure-level supply chain coverage; integrity, vulnerability, and threat detection for enterprise assets	Firmware vulnerability research and transparency platform positioning	SBOM/VEX workflows, continuous monitoring, and product security/compliance reporting
Key Weakness	Sparse independent reviews; public compliance posture and pricing information not clearly documented	Public pricing and deployment details not transparent; orientation may be more product-security focused	Less directly focused on enterprise fleet firmware integrity for internal IT assets (more product supply chain oriented)