Encamp

Name: Encamp
Brand: Encamp
Rating: 1 (1 reviews)

Encamp is a B2B SaaS platform for environmental compliance data management and reporting automation that automates EPCRA Tier II chemical inventory and RCRA hazardous waste workflows, integrates with EPA systems (RCRAInfo/e-Manifest), and combines software automation with managed submission services.

Est 2017|Valuation $155M|Raised $52.2M|20 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 9K|Website|FTEs 83|HQ Indianapolis, Indiana, US

MarketsHealth & Safety

Published Oct 15, 2026

01Common complaints

If the primary requirement is a broad, global EHS/ESG suite

For comprehensive incident management, training, audits, industrial hygiene, and multinational regulatory coverage, larger suites such as Enablon, Sphera, Cority, VelocityEHS, Intelex, or Benchmark Gensuite may provide broader functionality.

If a purely product-led, self-service experience is required

The vendor's stated approach includes an expert support component. Organizations seeking minimal vendor involvement should confirm the balance of product versus service during sales and reference checks.

If procurement requires publicly documented ISO certifications or detailed security collateral

Encamp publishes SOC 2 Type 2 for Security; ISO 27001 and other ISO-family artifacts were not found in the reviewed materials. Procurement teams requiring ISO certification may need to conduct additional vendor diligence.

If fixed, transparent list pricing is a requirement

Encamp does not publish list pricing on the public website; procurement may require custom quotes, which can extend procurement timelines.

1) If the primary requirement is a broad, global EHS/ESG suite - For comprehensive incident management, training, audits, industrial hygiene, and multinational regulatory coverage, larger suites such as Enablon, Sphera, Cority, VelocityEHS, Intelex, or Benchmark Gensuite may provide broader functionality. 2) If a purely product-led, self-service experience is required - The vendor's stated approach includes an expert support component. Organizations seeking minimal vendor involvement should confirm the balance of product versus service during sales and reference checks. 3) If procurement requires publicly documented ISO certifications or detailed security collateral - Encamp publishes SOC 2 Type 2 for Security; ISO 27001 and other ISO-family artifacts were not found in the reviewed materials. Procurement teams requiring ISO certification may need to conduct additional vendor diligence. 4) If fixed, transparent list pricing is a requirement - Encamp does not publish list pricing on the public website; procurement may require custom quotes, which can extend procurement timelines.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations that require a single broad EHS suite covering incidents, training, audits, ESG, and global regulatory coverage and do not want to adopt a specialized tool
Organizations operating primarily outside the U.S. that require non-U.S. regulatory coverage today
Organizations that prefer a purely self-serve, product-led solution with minimal vendor involvement

Limitations acknowledged or implied in sources

Limited independent review coverage: Independent review volume is limited (G2: one review in captured results; Capterra: 19 reviews), which constrains generalizability.
Product versus service balance: A G2 user review and multiple employee commentary signals characterize a service-heavy orientation; buyers should confirm the intended balance of product and managed services.

Roadmap / future scope

Older press coverage (2022) discusses potential expansion into additional environmental programs (e.g., Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, TRI) and potential expansion beyond the U.S. Buyers should validate what is generally available (GA) versus planned on the vendor roadmap.

Scale limitations

No public benchmarks for maximum facilities or manifests volume were found in the reviewed materials. Buyers should request:
- Reference architectures for similar scale deployments
- SLAs for uptime and performance
- Audit log coverage and retention policies

02Why they buy

Unique selling points supported by available evidence

Tier II submission execution and routing: Vendor materials describe connections to SERC/LEPC/fire departments and operational handling of submissions and fees.
RCRAInfo/e-Manifest alignment: Waste product messaging emphasizes integration with e-Manifest and RCRAInfo and manifest reconciliation workflows.
Guided compliance model: The vendor positions the product as software plus expert support, which some customers describe positively in vendor-provided testimonials.

- Tier II submission execution and routing: Vendor materials describe connections to SERC/LEPC/fire departments and operational handling of submissions and fees. - RCRAInfo/e-Manifest alignment: Waste product messaging emphasizes integration with e-Manifest and RCRAInfo and manifest reconciliation workflows. - Guided compliance model: The vendor positions the product as software plus expert support, which some customers describe positively in vendor-provided testimonials.

Where competitors may have advantages

Broader suite functionality, configurability, and global rollout experience from vendors such as Enablon, Sphera, and Cority
Larger independent review datasets and broader third-party analyst coverage for some competitors

03Field reports

Review-platform availability snapshot

G2: Very limited review volume in the captured search results (very few reviews surfaced), limiting generalizability.
Capterra: Larger sample in the captured results (a modest number of reviews) with a high overall score, though sample size remains modest for enterprise decision-making.
Gartner Peer Insights / TrustRadius: Encamp-specific pages were not clearly accessible in the captured sources; some vendor PDFs are hosted on third-party CDNs but are not equivalent to independent user reviews.

- G2: Very limited review volume in the captured search results (very few reviews surfaced), limiting generalizability. - Capterra: Larger sample in the captured results (a modest number of reviews) with a high overall score, though sample size remains modest for enterprise decision-making. - Gartner Peer Insights / TrustRadius: Encamp-specific pages were not clearly accessible in the captured sources; some vendor PDFs are hosted on third-party CDNs but are not equivalent to independent user reviews.

Direct quotes (positive and negative)

From G2 (a negative review; limited generalizability):

Review title: "It could be better, tech isn't where it should be."
Positive: "The idea of reporting automation is great."
Negative: "It felt more like consulting with a consulting company vs actually helpful technology."

From vendor-selected testimonials on Encamp’s website (subject to selection bias):

"Encamp relieves the burden of manually tracking RCRA deadlines by managing the entire submission workflow for us." (Attributed to an HSE Director at Ferguson on the vendor site.)
"Your solution is unique in that it’s the only one in the industry that can automate data collection and standardize it, while automating the reporting, submissions and fee payments." (Attributed to a Sr. Manager of ESG and Sustainability at TopBuild on the vendor site.)

These vendor-provided testimonials indicate perceived value but are not independent, randomized samples; they are subject to selection bias.

From G2 (a negative review; limited generalizability): - Review title: "It could be better, tech isn't where it should be." - Positive: "The idea of reporting automation is great." - Negative: "It felt more like consulting with a consulting company vs actually helpful technology." From vendor-selected testimonials on Encamp’s website (subject to selection bias): - "Encamp relieves the burden of manually tracking RCRA deadlines by managing the entire submission workflow for us." (Attributed to an HSE Director at Ferguson on the vendor site.) - "Your solution is unique in that it’s the only one in the industry that can automate data collection and standardize it, while automating the reporting, submissions and fee payments." (Attributed to a Sr. Manager of ESG and Sustainability at TopBuild on the vendor site.) These vendor-provided testimonials indicate perceived value but are not independent, randomized samples; they are subject to selection bias.

Common themes customers cite for choosing Encamp

Based on vendor materials and directory listings, reported reasons for adoption include:

Automation of Tier II and RCRA workflows
Centralized, multi-facility status tracking and audit readiness
Handling final submission tasks such as submissions, fee payments, and mailings for Tier II
Integrations with government systems (RCRAInfo/e-Manifest) and submission routing

Signals of potential mismatch

Evidence is limited due to the small independent review pool. Available signals include:

A reviewer perceived the offering as more consulting-driven than product-centric.
Vendor-selected testimonials emphasize service plus software, which may signal a closer service relationship than a purely self-service product.

Organizations that require a purely self-service, product-led experience should validate the vendor's service-to-product balance in demos and reference checks.

Evidence is limited due to the small independent review pool. Available signals include: - A reviewer perceived the offering as more consulting-driven than product-centric. - Vendor-selected testimonials emphasize service plus software, which may signal a closer service relationship than a purely self-service product. Organizations that require a purely self-service, product-led experience should validate the vendor's service-to-product balance in demos and reference checks.

Hexion (Tier II reporting workflow)

Vendor-provided PDF case study describes:

Multi-region Tier II reporting standardization
Dashboard visibility and centralized HQ oversight
Use of SAP as a material data source
Claimed implementation time: a short vendor-stated timeframe
Claimed time saved: a substantial number of person-hours

Critical evaluation:

These metrics are vendor-published and do not describe a rigorous measurement methodology (sample period, tasks counted, counterfactual assumptions). The narrative details (SAP exports, multiple regions, varying state requirements) are plausible and provide a reference architecture for Tier II deployments, but buyers should validate metrics via references.

Vendor-provided PDF case study describes: - Multi-region Tier II reporting standardization - Dashboard visibility and centralized HQ oversight - Use of SAP as a material data source - Claimed implementation time: a short vendor-stated timeframe - Claimed time saved: a substantial number of person-hours Critical evaluation: - These metrics are vendor-published and do not describe a rigorous measurement methodology (sample period, tasks counted, counterfactual assumptions). The narrative details (SAP exports, multiple regions, varying state requirements) are plausible and provide a reference architecture for Tier II deployments, but buyers should validate metrics via references.

Sysco (enterprise/multi-facility marketing page)

Encamp publishes a Sysco-specific page describing multi-facility challenges and centralizing Tier II and RCRA obligations.

Critical evaluation:

The page is a marketing landing page rather than an independently verified case study. Buyers should request direct reference calls to confirm scope, results, and what is in production versus marketing collateral.

04Best fit

Company sizes

Most suitable customers appear to be:

Mid-market to enterprise organizations with multi-site operations, often with substantial headcount and geographically distributed facilities across multiple U.S. states.

Industries

Industries with frequent Tier II and RCRA exposure:

Manufacturing and chemicals
Logistics and distribution
Large-format retail with many facilities
Energy and utilities
Construction materials and building products

Roles and personas

Decision makers: VP EHS, Director of Environmental Compliance, VP Risk/Operations
Champions/users: Corporate environmental managers, facility EHS coordinators, compliance specialists
Stakeholders: Legal, internal audit, operations leadership, ESG/sustainability reporting leaders

Pain points addressed

Annual Tier II reporting complexity and variability across state portals
Decentralized facility records and turnover risk
Waste manifest reconciliation and e-Manifest alignment
Audit readiness through centralized archives and deadline tracking

Qualification criteria (good fit)

Organizations that file Tier II across multiple U.S. states and require a standardized, repeatable process
Organizations that manage hazardous waste across multiple facilities and need generator status visibility
Organizations that prefer a combined software-plus-expert support model

05The pitch

What the product does (core value proposition)

Encamp is a B2B SaaS platform focused on environmental compliance data management and reporting automation, with emphasis on two U.S.-centric regulatory domains:

EPCRA / Tier II chemical inventory reporting (Encamp “Chemicals”)
RCRA hazardous waste compliance and reporting (Encamp “Waste”), including integration with EPA RCRAInfo / e-Manifest

Encamp describes its approach as "guided compliance," combining software automation with access to compliance experts to reduce spreadsheet-based workflows, missed deadlines, and reporting errors. The vendor also offers services that handle final submission tasks such as regulatory submissions and fee payments for Tier II filings, in addition to internal recordkeeping.

Encamp is a B2B SaaS platform focused on environmental compliance data management and reporting automation, with emphasis on two U.S.-centric regulatory domains: - EPCRA / Tier II chemical inventory reporting (Encamp “Chemicals”) - RCRA hazardous waste compliance and reporting (Encamp “Waste”), including integration with EPA RCRAInfo / e-Manifest Encamp describes its approach as "guided compliance," combining software automation with access to compliance experts to reduce spreadsheet-based workflows, missed deadlines, and reporting errors. The vendor also offers services that handle final submission tasks such as regulatory submissions and fee payments for Tier II filings, in addition to internal recordkeeping.

Target market and market positioning

Primary buyers/users: Enterprise and multi-facility EHS and environmental compliance teams managing reporting across multiple U.S. states and agencies.
Positioning: A workflow and automation layer that integrates facility-level data sources (e.g., ERP/SAP, manifests/vendors, local inventory records) and generates regulator-facing submissions and reporting.
Market niche: Compared with broad EHS suites (Enablon, Sphera, Cority, VelocityEHS), Encamp is more specialized in U.S. regulatory reporting execution, particularly Tier II and RCRA submission workflows.

The vendor states it is used by a few hundred enterprise customers; this is a vendor-provided claim and should be validated independently when required.

- Primary buyers/users: Enterprise and multi-facility EHS and environmental compliance teams managing reporting across multiple U.S. states and agencies. - Positioning: A workflow and automation layer that integrates facility-level data sources (e.g., ERP/SAP, manifests/vendors, local inventory records) and generates regulator-facing submissions and reporting. - Market niche: Compared with broad EHS suites (Enablon, Sphera, Cority, VelocityEHS), Encamp is more specialized in U.S. regulatory reporting execution, particularly Tier II and RCRA submission workflows. The vendor states it is used by a few hundred enterprise customers; this is a vendor-provided claim and should be validated independently when required.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Encamp including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →