Encuadrado

Name: Encuadrado
Brand: Encuadrado
Rating: 5 (24 reviews)

Appointment scheduling, payments and invoicing platform designed for the independent professional

Est 2019|Raised $1.6M|3 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 10K|Web traffic 546K|FTEs 162|HQ Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region, CL

MarketsMarketplace Software Invoicing & Payment Processing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Calendly vs Encuadrado: Calendly is often chosen for generic scheduling; Encuadrado appears chosen when a buyer wants an integrated business workflow and LatAm-oriented billing/payment expectations. A reviewer on a public review site reported switching from Calendly citing different integrations and lower price (their experience; not universally generalizable). - SimplePractice vs Encuadrado: SimplePractice is primarily a US behavioral-health practice platform with telehealth and documentation features. For Chile/LatAm, Encuadrado may be better aligned with local payments and invoicing; for US HIPAA-driven needs, SimplePractice and similar US providers may be more appropriate. - Doctoralia: Doctoralia is a healthcare marketplace/directory with booking; it competes for patient acquisition/visibility more than back-office consolidation. For some clinicians, the choice may be a visibility-focused marketplace (Doctoralia) versus an operations suite with a directory (Encuadrado).

	Encuadrado	Calendly	SimplePractice
Starting Price	Variable local-indexed pricing; vendor-disclosed card fees	Free plan available; published per-seat pricing available from the vendor	Published pricing that varies by plan; positioned as practice management for US healthcare
Best For	LatAm appointment-based professionals needing booking + payments + invoicing + directory presence	Scheduling-first teams needing broad integrations and booking UX	Behavioral health practices needing clinical and practice management depth (US)
Key Strength	Integrated booking, payment links, invoicing, and a marketplace/directory; local LatAm payment workflows	Integration ecosystem; scheduling UX; global maturity	Healthcare practice workflow depth (patient portal, documentation ecosystem)
Key Weakness	Less transparent global security posture; potential confusion around commissions; limited global review coverage	Limited LatAm invoicing/tax support; payments features limited on free tier	Can be expensive; focused on US healthcare compliance and workflows

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Calendly vs Encuadrado: Calendly is often chosen for generic scheduling; Encuadrado appears chosen when a buyer wants an integrated business workflow and LatAm-oriented billing/payment expectations. A reviewer on a public review site reported switching from Calendly citing different integrations and lower price (their experience; not universally generalizable).
SimplePractice vs Encuadrado: SimplePractice is primarily a US behavioral-health practice platform with telehealth and documentation features. For Chile/LatAm, Encuadrado may be better aligned with local payments and invoicing; for US HIPAA-driven needs, SimplePractice and similar US providers may be more appropriate.
Doctoralia: Doctoralia is a healthcare marketplace/directory with booking; it competes for patient acquisition/visibility more than back-office consolidation. For some clinicians, the choice may be a visibility-focused marketplace (Doctoralia) versus an operations suite with a directory (Encuadrado).

	Encuadrado	Calendly	SimplePractice
Starting Price	Variable local-indexed pricing; vendor-disclosed card fees	Free plan available; published per-seat pricing available from the vendor	Published pricing that varies by plan; positioned as practice management for US healthcare
Best For	LatAm appointment-based professionals needing booking + payments + invoicing + directory presence	Scheduling-first teams needing broad integrations and booking UX	Behavioral health practices needing clinical and practice management depth (US)
Key Strength	Integrated booking, payment links, invoicing, and a marketplace/directory; local LatAm payment workflows	Integration ecosystem; scheduling UX; global maturity	Healthcare practice workflow depth (patient portal, documentation ecosystem)
Key Weakness	Less transparent global security posture; potential confusion around commissions; limited global review coverage	Limited LatAm invoicing/tax support; payments features limited on free tier	Can be expensive; focused on US healthcare compliance and workflows