Engagedly

Name: Engagedly
Brand: Engagedly Inc
Rating: 4.3 (647 reviews)

Real-time performance management. Refreshingly simple and engaging.

Est 2015|Valuation $70M|Raised $5.7M|41 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 10K|Website|Web traffic 34K|FTEs 104|HQ Maplewood, Missouri, US

MarketsPerformance Management Employee Engagement & Survey Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas for improvement - Buyers who want both performance and specialized survey analytics may need to evaluate whether the vendor's survey and analytics capabilities meet their requirements or whether a survey-first vendor is more appropriate. - AI and gamification elements are vendor-described; independent validation of outcomes attributed to these features is limited in the sources reviewed. Where competitors often excel - Survey-first vendors are generally positioned as stronger in large-scale engagement survey analytics and benchmarking capability; they may provide more mature self-serve survey functionality. - Vendors focused on continuous feedback and manager effectiveness position themselves for organizations prioritizing those workflows. Market share / adoption trends (limited) - Third-party site engagement metrics show relatively small absolute mindshare for the vendor in some category snapshots; these metrics reflect site engagement, not overall market share.

	Engagedly	Lattice	15Five
Starting Price	Published per-user pricing with a referenced minimum annual spend and annual billing	Published per-seat pricing; some products can be unbundled; minimum annual agreement referenced	Published pricing tiers that vary by plan with annual billing
Primary Fit	Organizations seeking a modular suite combining performance, learning, recognition, and surveys from a single vendor	Organizations seeking a mature UX and packaged talent management modules	Organizations emphasizing continuous feedback and manager effectiveness workflows
Key Strength	Broad modular suite spanning performance, L&D, engagement, and recognition; SSO/SCIM options; mobile experience	Packaging and pricing transparency; market presence and product breadth in performance/talent	Strong focus on engagement and continuous feedback; clear tiering for engagement and performance
Key Weakness	Reported navigation and configuration challenges; full-suite cost increases with multiple modules	Can be expensive at scale and may require enterprise quotes for some modules	Some advanced capabilities may require higher tiers or add-ons

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas for improvement

Buyers who want both performance and specialized survey analytics may need to evaluate whether the vendor's survey and analytics capabilities meet their requirements or whether a survey-first vendor is more appropriate.
AI and gamification elements are vendor-described; independent validation of outcomes attributed to these features is limited in the sources reviewed.

Where competitors often excel

Survey-first vendors are generally positioned as stronger in large-scale engagement survey analytics and benchmarking capability; they may provide more mature self-serve survey functionality.
Vendors focused on continuous feedback and manager effectiveness position themselves for organizations prioritizing those workflows.

Market share / adoption trends (limited)

Third-party site engagement metrics show relatively small absolute mindshare for the vendor in some category snapshots; these metrics reflect site engagement, not overall market share.

	Engagedly	Lattice	15Five
Starting Price	Published per-user pricing with a referenced minimum annual spend and annual billing	Published per-seat pricing; some products can be unbundled; minimum annual agreement referenced	Published pricing tiers that vary by plan with annual billing
Primary Fit	Organizations seeking a modular suite combining performance, learning, recognition, and surveys from a single vendor	Organizations seeking a mature UX and packaged talent management modules	Organizations emphasizing continuous feedback and manager effectiveness workflows
Key Strength	Broad modular suite spanning performance, L&D, engagement, and recognition; SSO/SCIM options; mobile experience	Packaging and pricing transparency; market presence and product breadth in performance/talent	Strong focus on engagement and continuous feedback; clear tiering for engagement and performance
Key Weakness	Reported navigation and configuration challenges; full-suite cost increases with multiple modules	Can be expensive at scale and may require enterprise quotes for some modules	Some advanced capabilities may require higher tiers or add-ons