Enin.

Name: Enin.
Brand: Enin.

Enin transforms how you analyze companies, using AI on real-time data.

Est 2016|Valuation $80M|Raised $10.8M

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 10K|FTEs 15|HQ Oslo, Oslo, NO

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Enin versus global data providers (D&B): - Enin’s appeal is likely stronger when local registry integration, ownership/role networks, and Nordic-specific signals are required and when these are desired within a single investigation workflow. - D&B tends to be preferable for global breadth, standardized identifiers, and multinational coverage. Enin versus AML specialists (ComplyAdvantage / World-Check / Dow Jones): - Enin offers AML/KYC functionality and states it provides PEP and sanctions screening via a third-party partnership, but the depth of case management and regulatory workflow capabilities is not clearly documented publicly. - Dedicated AML vendors often provide more mature alert and case-management tooling, tuning capabilities, and broader global datasets. Enin versus Norway-focused competitors (local registries / credit-data providers): - Regional providers are established for business information and credit data; Enin differentiates via flags, risk models, monitoring workflows, and a portal designed for investigations. - Buyers should compare data freshness, coverage, licensing rights, and API ergonomics.

	Enin	Dun & Bradstreet (D&B Hoovers)	ComplyAdvantage
Starting Price	Portal: per-user monthly subscription. API: quote-based.	Starter/essentials tiers are self-serve; enterprise pricing is quote-based.	Self-serve starter tiers and enterprise pricing is quote-based.
Best For	Norway/Scandinavia-focused entity intelligence, risk flags, and portfolio monitoring; analysts in banking and audit	Global company and contact data, firmographics, and sales intelligence; broader global footprint	AML screening and monitoring (sanctions, PEP, adverse media) with global orientation; fintech/regtech workflows
Key Strength	Integrated workflow UI combined with Nordic corporate data, proprietary risk models, and monitoring	Global coverage, standardized identifiers, and broad datasets; sales intelligence features	AML-focused datasets and ongoing monitoring for sanctions/PEP/adverse media
Key Weakness	Limited public security and compliance disclosures; limited independent reviews; unclear global coverage	Pricing opacity and credit mechanics; may lack local Nordic nuance relative to local vendors	Not a full Nordic company registry/ownership visualization product; may require separate entity data provider

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Enin versus global data providers (D&B):

Enin’s appeal is likely stronger when local registry integration, ownership/role networks, and Nordic-specific signals are required and when these are desired within a single investigation workflow.
D&B tends to be preferable for global breadth, standardized identifiers, and multinational coverage.

Enin versus AML specialists (ComplyAdvantage / World-Check / Dow Jones):

Enin offers AML/KYC functionality and states it provides PEP and sanctions screening via a third-party partnership, but the depth of case management and regulatory workflow capabilities is not clearly documented publicly.
Dedicated AML vendors often provide more mature alert and case-management tooling, tuning capabilities, and broader global datasets.

Enin versus Norway-focused competitors (local registries / credit-data providers):

Regional providers are established for business information and credit data; Enin differentiates via flags, risk models, monitoring workflows, and a portal designed for investigations.
Buyers should compare data freshness, coverage, licensing rights, and API ergonomics.

	Enin	Dun & Bradstreet (D&B Hoovers)	ComplyAdvantage
Starting Price	Portal: per-user monthly subscription. API: quote-based.	Starter/essentials tiers are self-serve; enterprise pricing is quote-based.	Self-serve starter tiers and enterprise pricing is quote-based.
Best For	Norway/Scandinavia-focused entity intelligence, risk flags, and portfolio monitoring; analysts in banking and audit	Global company and contact data, firmographics, and sales intelligence; broader global footprint	AML screening and monitoring (sanctions, PEP, adverse media) with global orientation; fintech/regtech workflows
Key Strength	Integrated workflow UI combined with Nordic corporate data, proprietary risk models, and monitoring	Global coverage, standardized identifiers, and broad datasets; sales intelligence features	AML-focused datasets and ongoing monitoring for sanctions/PEP/adverse media
Key Weakness	Limited public security and compliance disclosures; limited independent reviews; unclear global coverage	Pricing opacity and credit mechanics; may lack local Nordic nuance relative to local vendors	Not a full Nordic company registry/ownership visualization product; may require separate entity data provider

Enin.

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map