Envoy

Name: Envoy
Brand: Envoy
Rating: 4.7 (935 reviews)

Leader

We protect the places the world relies on most.

Est 2013|Valuation $1.4B|Raised $205.5M|189 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 23K|Website|Web traffic 666K|FTEs 460|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsWorkplace Management Visitor Management Identity Provider (IdP) & Single Sign-On (SSO)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Envoy tends to be selected - Enterprise compliance features: SOC 2 Type 2 claim, audit trails, ID scanning and watchlists (Enterprise tier), access-control and guest Wi‑Fi integrations. - Range of features: visitor management plus workplace booking, deliveries/mailroom, digital signage, and emergency notifications. - Integrations ecosystem: vendor statements indicate a broad set of integrations and an open API. Where competitors often raise objections - Pricing and packaging: competitors highlight potential cost and packaging complexity concerns. - Hardware/platform constraints: competitors claim some modules are iPad-centric; buyers should verify platform support for specific modules. Alternatives that may be preferable in some scenarios - Sign In App: attractive for smaller organizations seeking predictable annual pricing without premium-tier requirements. - iLobby: often chosen by organizations with highly complex screening and compliance needs (requires deeper evaluation).

Market share and adoption trends

Envoy reports a sizable number of workplaces on vendor materials; this indicates significant adoption but is vendor-reported and not independently audited.
Review volumes on major review sites indicate notable public usage and feedback across reviewers.

	Envoy (Workplace/Visitors)	SwipedOn	Sign In App
Starting Price	Vendor publishes tiered visitor pricing including a free/basic tier and paid standard and premium tiers; published per-location/site pricing available from the vendor	Competitor materials emphasize simple, predictable plans; published pricing available from the vendor	Public materials show annual per-site pricing examples; published annual/site pricing varies by plan and is available from the vendor
Best For	Organizations seeking an enterprise-oriented, integrated platform (visitors + workplace + communications)	Organizations prioritizing quick setup, customization, and predictable packaging (per competitor materials)	Cost-conscious organizations preferring annual per-site pricing and modular add-ons
Key Strength	Enterprise integrations and a broad set of features; documented visitor compliance functionality	Emphasizes value and customization in competitor materials; simpler packaging claims	Potentially lower entry cost depending on scope; modular visitor management features
Key Weakness	Cost at scale; reported performance/UX concerns for booking; feature gating across tiers	Competitor comparisons may be biased; feature depth for complex enterprise/compliance should be validated	May require careful evaluation for complex enterprise security/compliance needs versus Envoy/iLobby

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Envoy tends to be selected

Enterprise compliance features: SOC 2 Type 2 claim, audit trails, ID scanning and watchlists (Enterprise tier), access-control and guest Wi‑Fi integrations.
Range of features: visitor management plus workplace booking, deliveries/mailroom, digital signage, and emergency notifications.
Integrations ecosystem: vendor statements indicate a broad set of integrations and an open API.

Where competitors often raise objections

Pricing and packaging: competitors highlight potential cost and packaging complexity concerns.
Hardware/platform constraints: competitors claim some modules are iPad-centric; buyers should verify platform support for specific modules.

Alternatives that may be preferable in some scenarios

Sign In App: attractive for smaller organizations seeking predictable annual pricing without premium-tier requirements.
iLobby: often chosen by organizations with highly complex screening and compliance needs (requires deeper evaluation).

Market share and adoption trends

Envoy reports a sizable number of workplaces on vendor materials; this indicates significant adoption but is vendor-reported and not independently audited.
Review volumes on major review sites indicate notable public usage and feedback across reviewers.

	Envoy (Workplace/Visitors)	SwipedOn	Sign In App
Starting Price	Vendor publishes tiered visitor pricing including a free/basic tier and paid standard and premium tiers; published per-location/site pricing available from the vendor	Competitor materials emphasize simple, predictable plans; published pricing available from the vendor	Public materials show annual per-site pricing examples; published annual/site pricing varies by plan and is available from the vendor
Best For	Organizations seeking an enterprise-oriented, integrated platform (visitors + workplace + communications)	Organizations prioritizing quick setup, customization, and predictable packaging (per competitor materials)	Cost-conscious organizations preferring annual per-site pricing and modular add-ons
Key Strength	Enterprise integrations and a broad set of features; documented visitor compliance functionality	Emphasizes value and customization in competitor materials; simpler packaging claims	Potentially lower entry cost depending on scope; modular visitor management features
Key Weakness	Cost at scale; reported performance/UX concerns for booking; feature gating across tiers	Competitor comparisons may be biased; feature depth for complex enterprise/compliance should be validated	May require careful evaluation for complex enterprise security/compliance needs versus Envoy/iLobby