Exiger

Name: Exiger
Brand: Exiger
Rating: 4.7 (61 reviews)

Leader

Making the world a safe and transparent place to succeed

Est 2013|Valuation $1.2B|Raised $47.8M|38 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 35K|Web traffic 34K|FTEs 800|HQ McLean, Virginia, US

MarketsSource-to-Pay Procure-to-Pay Supplier Intelligence Vendor Risk Management Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Differentiation themes: - Exiger emphasizes mapping product composition (parts, materials, software) and linking that to supply chain entities through a knowledge graph approach. - Resilinc is commonly associated with resiliency, disruption monitoring, and validated supply chain data and collaboration capabilities. - Interos is commonly positioned around entity relationship mapping and broader ecosystem exposure analysis. Analyst and market recognition: - Vendor communications state that Exiger was named a Leader in a Gartner Magic Quadrant for Supplier Risk Management Solutions and cite other analyst recognition. These are vendor-published references to analyst assessments; buyers should consult original analyst reports where licensing permits to validate the context and criteria used. Pricing comparison: - Exiger and Interos typically use enterprise-quoted pricing models; Resilinc has entries in some third-party directories that show sample starting figures, though these listings may not reflect typical enterprise contracts. When customers choose competitors instead: - Resilinc is often selected when primary needs center on disruption monitoring, supplier collaboration, and resiliency workflows. - Interos is commonly chosen when rapid entity-based relationship mapping and concentration risk analysis are primary objectives and BOM-level tracing is not required.

	Exiger (1Exiger)	Resilinc	Interos
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (enterprise quote)	Some third-party directories show sample entry-level listings (figures may be outdated)	Not publicly listed (enterprise quote)
Use Cases	Organisations needing multi-tier mapping down to parts/material/software; regulated public sector; combined SCRM/TPRM/cyber supply chain functionality	Organisations prioritizing disruption monitoring, multi-tier mapping, and supplier collaboration workflows	Organisations focused on entity relationship mapping and ecosystem exposure analysis
Key Strengths	Coverage across physical and software supply chain risk; FedRAMP Moderate option; vendor-reported analyst recognition	Established presence in resiliency/mapping with a focus on disruption intelligence	Entity relationship mapping and ecosystem exposure visibility depending on deployment
Key Weaknesses	Pricing opacity; potential implementation complexity; certain vendor claims are not independently verifiable	Depth of BOM/parts/material-level data may vary by deployment; enterprise pricing common	May be less focused on part/material-level BOM tracing compared with suppliers that emphasize that capability

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Differentiation themes:

Exiger emphasizes mapping product composition (parts, materials, software) and linking that to supply chain entities through a knowledge graph approach.
Resilinc is commonly associated with resiliency, disruption monitoring, and validated supply chain data and collaboration capabilities.
Interos is commonly positioned around entity relationship mapping and broader ecosystem exposure analysis.

Analyst and market recognition:

Vendor communications state that Exiger was named a Leader in a Gartner Magic Quadrant for Supplier Risk Management Solutions and cite other analyst recognition. These are vendor-published references to analyst assessments; buyers should consult original analyst reports where licensing permits to validate the context and criteria used.

Pricing comparison:

Exiger and Interos typically use enterprise-quoted pricing models; Resilinc has entries in some third-party directories that show sample starting figures, though these listings may not reflect typical enterprise contracts.

When customers choose competitors instead:

Resilinc is often selected when primary needs center on disruption monitoring, supplier collaboration, and resiliency workflows.
Interos is commonly chosen when rapid entity-based relationship mapping and concentration risk analysis are primary objectives and BOM-level tracing is not required.

	Exiger (1Exiger)	Resilinc	Interos
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (enterprise quote)	Some third-party directories show sample entry-level listings (figures may be outdated)	Not publicly listed (enterprise quote)
Use Cases	Organisations needing multi-tier mapping down to parts/material/software; regulated public sector; combined SCRM/TPRM/cyber supply chain functionality	Organisations prioritizing disruption monitoring, multi-tier mapping, and supplier collaboration workflows	Organisations focused on entity relationship mapping and ecosystem exposure analysis
Key Strengths	Coverage across physical and software supply chain risk; FedRAMP Moderate option; vendor-reported analyst recognition	Established presence in resiliency/mapping with a focus on disruption intelligence	Entity relationship mapping and ecosystem exposure visibility depending on deployment
Key Weaknesses	Pricing opacity; potential implementation complexity; certain vendor claims are not independently verifiable	Depth of BOM/parts/material-level data may vary by deployment; enterprise pricing common	May be less focused on part/material-level BOM tracing compared with suppliers that emphasize that capability