Figtree Systems

Name: Figtree Systems
Brand: Figtree Systems

A global software and IT services provider with extensive experience as a vendor to the risk and insurance industry.

Est 1983|2 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Website|FTEs 42|HQ Sydney, New South Wales, AU

MarketsHealth & Safety Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Figtree Systems | Origami Risk | OneShield Claims | |--------|-----------------|--------------|------------------| | Starting Price | Published starting price shown on some directory listings (likely indicative of a starting package or quote-based enterprise pricing) | Quote-based (no published list pricing) | Quote-based (enterprise insurance platform; no public list pricing) | | Typical Fit | Organizations in AU/NZ public sector, self-insurance, and mid-market enterprises seeking an integrated suite for claims/risk/safety/fleet with configurable workflows | Large organizations seeking broad RMIS + EHS + GRC capabilities, with a larger vendor ecosystem | Insurance carriers needing configurable claims processing across lines of business | | Key Strength | Public ISO 27001 certification for listed offices; multi-module suite; vendor-provided support and configurability emphasized in reviews | Broad market recognition in RMIS/EHS; large enterprise footprint; extensive configurability and analytics | Depth in carrier-grade claims processing and lifecycle workflow capabilities | | Key Weakness | Limited independent review volume; limited public disclosure of technical/security detail beyond ISO certifications; some reporting complexity reported by users | Pricing opacity for some buyers; implementation complexity for large deployments | Often heavier implementation effort and may be more aligned to carrier IT environments | - Differentiators among listed competitors - Origami Risk: broader RMIS/EHS/GRC footprint with enterprise-level analytics and ecosystem presence. - Riskonnect: RMIS focus with visible community and analyst presence in certain markets. - OneShield / Guidewire / Duck Creek: carrier-grade suites focused on policy, billing, and claims integration for insurers. - Feature comparison (based on limited public evidence) - Areas where Figtree appears comparatively stronger: - Alignment with AU/NZ public-sector use cases and regulatory context - Cross-module integration across claims, safety, and fleet within a single suite - Emphasis on configurability and vendor-led support relationships - Areas where Figtree is less clearly evidenced: - Public documentation of a broad integration marketplace or developer ecosystem - Independent validation of large-scale global deployments - Extensive, published technical trust-center materials compared with larger vendors - Pricing comparison and procurement implications - Figtree: appears to be enterprise-priced with package-level listings on some directories; final pricing is likely scoped and quote-based. - Other RMIS suites: typically quote-based; procurement commonly requires scoping workshops and TCO analysis. - Recommendation: procurement should include a structured TCO comparison that accounts for implementation services, ongoing administrative and reporting effort, integration costs, and module licensing. - Market share and adoption trends - No credible, public market-share data for Figtree Systems was identified in accessible sources tested. Vendor presence appears modest compared with large RMIS incumbents.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Figtree Systems	Origami Risk	OneShield Claims
Starting Price	Published starting price shown on some directory listings (likely indicative of a starting package or quote-based enterprise pricing)	Quote-based (no published list pricing)	Quote-based (enterprise insurance platform; no public list pricing)
Typical Fit	Organizations in AU/NZ public sector, self-insurance, and mid-market enterprises seeking an integrated suite for claims/risk/safety/fleet with configurable workflows	Large organizations seeking broad RMIS + EHS + GRC capabilities, with a larger vendor ecosystem	Insurance carriers needing configurable claims processing across lines of business
Key Strength	Public ISO 27001 certification for listed offices; multi-module suite; vendor-provided support and configurability emphasized in reviews	Broad market recognition in RMIS/EHS; large enterprise footprint; extensive configurability and analytics	Depth in carrier-grade claims processing and lifecycle workflow capabilities
Key Weakness	Limited independent review volume; limited public disclosure of technical/security detail beyond ISO certifications; some reporting complexity reported by users	Pricing opacity for some buyers; implementation complexity for large deployments	Often heavier implementation effort and may be more aligned to carrier IT environments

Differentiators among listed competitors
- Origami Risk: broader RMIS/EHS/GRC footprint with enterprise-level analytics and ecosystem presence.
- Riskonnect: RMIS focus with visible community and analyst presence in certain markets.
- OneShield / Guidewire / Duck Creek: carrier-grade suites focused on policy, billing, and claims integration for insurers.
Feature comparison (based on limited public evidence)
- Areas where Figtree appears comparatively stronger:
  - Alignment with AU/NZ public-sector use cases and regulatory context
  - Cross-module integration across claims, safety, and fleet within a single suite
  - Emphasis on configurability and vendor-led support relationships
- Areas where Figtree is less clearly evidenced:
  - Public documentation of a broad integration marketplace or developer ecosystem
  - Independent validation of large-scale global deployments
  - Extensive, published technical trust-center materials compared with larger vendors
Pricing comparison and procurement implications
- Figtree: appears to be enterprise-priced with package-level listings on some directories; final pricing is likely scoped and quote-based.
- Other RMIS suites: typically quote-based; procurement commonly requires scoping workshops and TCO analysis.
- Recommendation: procurement should include a structured TCO comparison that accounts for implementation services, ongoing administrative and reporting effort, integration costs, and module licensing.
Market share and adoption trends
- No credible, public market-share data for Figtree Systems was identified in accessible sources tested. Vendor presence appears modest compared with large RMIS incumbents.

Aspect

Figtree Systems

Origami Risk

OneShield Claims

Starting Price

Published starting price shown on some directory listings (likely indicative of a starting package or quote-based enterprise pricing)

Quote-based (no published list pricing)

Quote-based (enterprise insurance platform; no public list pricing)

Typical Fit

Organizations in AU/NZ public sector, self-insurance, and mid-market enterprises seeking an integrated suite for claims/risk/safety/fleet with configurable workflows

Large organizations seeking broad RMIS + EHS + GRC capabilities, with a larger vendor ecosystem

Insurance carriers needing configurable claims processing across lines of business

Key Strength

Public ISO 27001 certification for listed offices; multi-module suite; vendor-provided support and configurability emphasized in reviews

Broad market recognition in RMIS/EHS; large enterprise footprint; extensive configurability and analytics

Depth in carrier-grade claims processing and lifecycle workflow capabilities

Key Weakness

Limited independent review volume; limited public disclosure of technical/security detail beyond ISO certifications; some reporting complexity reported by users

Pricing opacity for some buyers; implementation complexity for large deployments

Often heavier implementation effort and may be more aligned to carrier IT environments