FloQast

Name: FloQast
Brand: FloQast
Rating: 4.6 (1790 reviews)

Leader

AI, by accountants, for accountants

Est 2013|Valuation $1.6B|Raised $302.9M|115 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 38K|Web traffic 59K|FTEs 874|HQ Sherman Oaks, California, US

MarketsAccount Reconciliation Internal Controls & Audit Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

FloQast vs BlackLine:
- The vendor emphasizes ease of use, faster go-live, and customer satisfaction ratings on third-party review sites. BlackLine emphasizes broader record-to-report coverage and process standardization. Both vendor-authored comparison pages are marketing material and should be validated with demos and security documentation.
FloQast vs Numeric:
- Numeric publishes list pricing and positions itself as a modern close competitor. FloQast offers a broader module set and a larger customer base; however, pricing opacity may be a factor during procurement.
Trintech Cadency:
- Trintech typically targets larger enterprises and provides a broad R2R product set; public pricing is not readily available.

- FloQast vs BlackLine: - The vendor emphasizes ease of use, faster go-live, and customer satisfaction ratings on third-party review sites. BlackLine emphasizes broader record-to-report coverage and process standardization. Both vendor-authored comparison pages are marketing material and should be validated with demos and security documentation. - FloQast vs Numeric: - Numeric publishes list pricing and positions itself as a modern close competitor. FloQast offers a broader module set and a larger customer base; however, pricing opacity may be a factor during procurement. - Trintech Cadency: - Trintech typically targets larger enterprises and provides a broad R2R product set; public pricing is not readily available.

	FloQast	BlackLine	Numeric
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; Contact Sales	Not publicly listed; Contact Sales	Entry per-user monthly pricing for an essentials tier
Typical Customers	Mid-market to enterprise teams seeking close workflow visibility, reconciliations, and controls automation	Larger/complex enterprises seeking broader R2R automation and process standardization	Smaller-to-mid teams seeking modern close task management with transparent entry pricing
Key Strength	Emphasis on close checklist workflow, audit evidence, and a growing set of reconciliation and compliance features	Broader suite coverage for record-to-report processes and enterprise process standardization	Transparent entry pricing and a modern UX focus for teams prioritizing straightforward task management
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity and reported feature gaps or admin/performance friction in some customer accounts	Perceptions of higher cost and implementation complexity for some customers	May lack the breadth of enterprise-grade suite features compared with larger R2R vendors