Foodics

Name: Foodics
Brand: Foodics
Rating: 4.4 (61 reviews)

Equipping restaurateurs with intuitive tech to establish resilience, foster customer connections, and sustain growth.

Est 2014|Raised $198M|32 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 412K|Web traffic 727K|FTEs 1,140|HQ Riyadh, Riyadh, SA

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Foodics vs Square: Square is generally stronger for US/Europe SMBs that want minimal software fees and a self-serve onboarding model. Foodics is more regionally focused (KSA/MENA) and may better align with local invoicing and compliance expectations, but it can be more expensive than entry-level POS options. - Foodics vs Toast: Toast is a strong restaurant-native platform in the US, but pricing can be opaque when factoring hardware, add-ons, and processing. Foodics may be more competitive in KSA/MENA deployments where regional payments, compliance, and local support presence are important. - Enterprise alternatives (Oracle MICROS): MICROS is typically chosen by large hotel/enterprise operators needing mature enterprise controls and global support, but it is heavier, more expensive, and slower to deploy.

	Foodics	Square for Restaurants	Toast POS
Starting Price	Published bundles (starter in some segments) plus a custom quote for full setup; list bundles range from low-hundreds to low-thousands per month depending on tier and billing cadence	Free plan available plus payment processing; low-cost paid tiers for basic use cases	Varies; often tied to vendor payment processing and hardware; hardware and add-ons can drive total cost significantly
Typical customers	MENA-based restaurant groups needing POS + back office + local compliance (e.g., KSA)	Very small to SMB restaurants wanting low monthly software cost and quick setup	US restaurant operators wanting deep restaurant workflows and a broad hardware/partner ecosystem
Key Strength	Integrated platform (POS + inventory + BI + online + payments); regional alignment for KSA/MENA markets	Low barrier to entry; simple software pricing for basic use cases	Restaurant-native workflows, KDS, and an extensive partner ecosystem (especially in the US)
Key Weakness	Mixed support reviews; bundle/add-on complexity; unclear public SOC 2/ISO posture	Can become costly with add-ons/devices; less tailored to MENA compliance specifics	TCO complexity: hardware, add-ons, and processing requirements can be expensive

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Foodics vs Square: Square is generally stronger for US/Europe SMBs that want minimal software fees and a self-serve onboarding model. Foodics is more regionally focused (KSA/MENA) and may better align with local invoicing and compliance expectations, but it can be more expensive than entry-level POS options.
Foodics vs Toast: Toast is a strong restaurant-native platform in the US, but pricing can be opaque when factoring hardware, add-ons, and processing. Foodics may be more competitive in KSA/MENA deployments where regional payments, compliance, and local support presence are important.
Enterprise alternatives (Oracle MICROS): MICROS is typically chosen by large hotel/enterprise operators needing mature enterprise controls and global support, but it is heavier, more expensive, and slower to deploy.

	Foodics	Square for Restaurants	Toast POS
Starting Price	Published bundles (starter in some segments) plus a custom quote for full setup; list bundles range from low-hundreds to low-thousands per month depending on tier and billing cadence	Free plan available plus payment processing; low-cost paid tiers for basic use cases	Varies; often tied to vendor payment processing and hardware; hardware and add-ons can drive total cost significantly
Typical customers	MENA-based restaurant groups needing POS + back office + local compliance (e.g., KSA)	Very small to SMB restaurants wanting low monthly software cost and quick setup	US restaurant operators wanting deep restaurant workflows and a broad hardware/partner ecosystem
Key Strength	Integrated platform (POS + inventory + BI + online + payments); regional alignment for KSA/MENA markets	Low barrier to entry; simple software pricing for basic use cases	Restaurant-native workflows, KDS, and an extensive partner ecosystem (especially in the US)
Key Weakness	Mixed support reviews; bundle/add-on complexity; unclear public SOC 2/ISO posture	Can become costly with add-ons/devices; less tailored to MENA compliance specifics	TCO complexity: hardware, add-ons, and processing requirements can be expensive

Foodics

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map