ForceMetrics

Name: ForceMetrics
Brand: ForceMetrics

AI Native

Turning Public Safety Data Into Action

Est 2020|Valuation $53.5M|Raised $25.2M|35 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 8K|Website|Web traffic 6K|FTEs 40|HQ Denver, Colorado, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- ForceMetrics vs Peregrine: Peregrine is often described in market materials as an integrated platform for RTCC-style deployments; ForceMetrics positions itself as a search and analysis layer. Agencies seeking a broad, customizable citywide data platform may prefer Peregrine; agencies focused on adding a unified search and quick-access context layer for officers may evaluate ForceMetrics. - ForceMetrics vs Axon/Fusus: Axon and Fusus focus on real-time video, cameras, and sensor fusion. Agencies whose priority is real-time video operations may consider those vendors as anchors; ForceMetrics can function as an adjunct data context layer if integrations are available. - ForceMetrics vs Mark43/CentralSquare/Tyler: These vendors primarily offer systems-of-record. Agencies may opt to exploit existing CAD/RMS analytics capabilities before adding a separate platform. ForceMetrics’ differentiator is vendor-agnostic data unification and search across disparate systems.

Adoption and market signals

ForceMetrics has coverage in public-technology press about company announcements and growth.
The company has participated in a govtech accelerator program hosted by a major cloud provider, indicating engagement with relevant ecosystem initiatives.

	ForceMetrics	Peregrine Technologies	Mark43
Starting Price	Not publicly standardized; often private offer / procurement; marketplace references indicate published per-seat or per-officer pricing available from the vendor	Typically contact sales; public-safety platform pricing is often custom; some public procurement documents show historical contract values	Not publicly self-serve; pricing typically based on officer counts/modules; public procurement documents sometimes describe pricing basis
Best For	Agencies seeking a unified search and analytics layer across CAD/RMS/JMS with a focus on usability for field officers and analysts	Agencies aiming for a broad RTCC-style integrated operations platform with enterprise-scale data capabilities	Agencies seeking RMS/CAD modernization with integrated modules and system-of-record ownership
Key Strength	Purpose-built unified search, entity linkage, and visual relationship exploration; vendor emphasizes usability and deployment speed	Positioned as an enterprise RTCC/integrated public-safety platform with customization options	System-of-record depth (RMS/CAD modules) and familiarity in many procurement contexts
Key Weakness	Limited visibility on mainstream review platforms; public claims rely heavily on vendor materials; integration dependencies	Platform complexity, potential cost, and political scrutiny related to surveillance tech	Potentially heavier implementation effort; may require additional layers to match vendor-agnostic unified-search experiences

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

ForceMetrics vs Peregrine: Peregrine is often described in market materials as an integrated platform for RTCC-style deployments; ForceMetrics positions itself as a search and analysis layer. Agencies seeking a broad, customizable citywide data platform may prefer Peregrine; agencies focused on adding a unified search and quick-access context layer for officers may evaluate ForceMetrics.
ForceMetrics vs Axon/Fusus: Axon and Fusus focus on real-time video, cameras, and sensor fusion. Agencies whose priority is real-time video operations may consider those vendors as anchors; ForceMetrics can function as an adjunct data context layer if integrations are available.
ForceMetrics vs Mark43/CentralSquare/Tyler: These vendors primarily offer systems-of-record. Agencies may opt to exploit existing CAD/RMS analytics capabilities before adding a separate platform. ForceMetrics’ differentiator is vendor-agnostic data unification and search across disparate systems.

Adoption and market signals

ForceMetrics has coverage in public-technology press about company announcements and growth.
The company has participated in a govtech accelerator program hosted by a major cloud provider, indicating engagement with relevant ecosystem initiatives.

	ForceMetrics	Peregrine Technologies	Mark43
Starting Price	Not publicly standardized; often private offer / procurement; marketplace references indicate published per-seat or per-officer pricing available from the vendor	Typically contact sales; public-safety platform pricing is often custom; some public procurement documents show historical contract values	Not publicly self-serve; pricing typically based on officer counts/modules; public procurement documents sometimes describe pricing basis
Best For	Agencies seeking a unified search and analytics layer across CAD/RMS/JMS with a focus on usability for field officers and analysts	Agencies aiming for a broad RTCC-style integrated operations platform with enterprise-scale data capabilities	Agencies seeking RMS/CAD modernization with integrated modules and system-of-record ownership
Key Strength	Purpose-built unified search, entity linkage, and visual relationship exploration; vendor emphasizes usability and deployment speed	Positioned as an enterprise RTCC/integrated public-safety platform with customization options	System-of-record depth (RMS/CAD modules) and familiarity in many procurement contexts
Key Weakness	Limited visibility on mainstream review platforms; public claims rely heavily on vendor materials; integration dependencies	Platform complexity, potential cost, and political scrutiny related to surveillance tech	Potentially heavier implementation effort; may require additional layers to match vendor-agnostic unified-search experiences

ForceMetrics

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Adoption and market signals

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Adoption and market signals

02Market Map