FYLD
AI NativeFrontline intelligence. Driving operational excellence. Designed for critical infrastructure organizations.
MarketsHealth & Safety
Frontline intelligence. Driving operational excellence. Designed for critical infrastructure organizations.
Published Aug 15, 2026
| Starting Price | Not publicly listed (demo/quote) | Quote-based (pricing depends on revenue/sites; subcontractors free) | Public tiers; free entry-level option and paid tier (publicly listed) |
| Best For | Utilities and heavy civil teams that require video-based field evidence and manager prioritization | General contractors seeking configurable safety and compliance workflows, including subcontractor management | Smaller-to-mid safety programs that require rapid onboarding and transparent entry pricing |
| Key Strength | Video-based workflows and integration with construction PM systems (for example, Procore) | Broad safety/compliance feature set and subcontractor access models | Pricing transparency and simpler onboarding for basic safety needs |
| Key Weakness | Limited public third-party reviews and limited public pricing information; deployment depends on change management and connectivity | Pricing is quote-based and may exceed needs for simple inspection use cases | May lack advanced field-execution analytics for complex infrastructure programs |
FYLD presents a differentiating focus on video-based assessments and on providing managers with more consolidated field visibility and prioritization compared with basic form-based EHS tools. HammerTech and Safesite focus more on inspections, compliance, and safety program workflows, while Procore serves as a construction project management backbone; FYLD’s integration with Procore suggests FYLD is positioned as a complement to PM systems rather than a direct replacement in many organizations.