Genesy

Name: Genesy
Brand: Genesy
Rating: 4.8 (40 reviews)

AI Native

Where sales begin.

Est 2023|Raised $5.7M|19 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 15K|Website|FTEs 97|HQ Barcelona, Catalonia, ES

MarketsOutreach Automation AI SDR

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Apollo.io vs Genesy: Apollo is often selected for predictable self-serve onboarding and clear packaging; Genesy differentiates on AI-assisted conversation handling and an integrated multichannel workflow, with more vendor-led support. Organizations that need clearer procurement comparators typically find Apollo easier to evaluate. - ZoomInfo vs Genesy: ZoomInfo provides deeper, enterprise-focused data and integrations suitable for large teams; Genesy is positioned more as an execution platform combining data and outreach with a newer AI layer. ZoomInfo's trade-offs are typically cost and contract rigidity; Genesy's trade-offs relate to product maturity and transparency. - Lusha vs Genesy: Lusha is commonly used as a lightweight enrichment/contact-finding tool; Genesy provides enrichment plus integrated multichannel automation. In many practical deployments, teams pair a focused enrichment tool with a sequencer; Genesy aims to reduce that stack by integrating both.

Market adoption trends (high-level)

Investor interest and market commentary indicate a trend toward AI-assisted sales automation and "AI SDR" concepts. Genesy's funding was positioned in the context of that trend.

	Genesy	Apollo.io	ZoomInfo
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Published tiers exist (self-serve entry through higher tiers)	Typically enterprise quote-based; entry packages are generally positioned at enterprise pricing levels
Best For	Teams seeking an integrated workflow: data + enrichment + multichannel outreach + AI assistance	SMB/mid-market teams wanting strong database + sequencing with transparent tiers	Larger organizations needing deep data, intent/org charts, and enterprise workflows
Key Strength	Integrated workflow; positive support sentiment; LinkedIn+email sequencing plus AI-assisted variables	Mature product, broad adoption, transparent packaging; robust outreach features	Depth of data and enterprise features; category incumbent
Key Weakness	Product maturity concerns (bugs/performance/integration); pricing opacity; limited public security attestations	Credit limits and upsell dynamics; data quality varies by segment; may require add-ons	Cost and contract complexity; potential for underutilization in some organizations

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Apollo.io vs Genesy: Apollo is often selected for predictable self-serve onboarding and clear packaging; Genesy differentiates on AI-assisted conversation handling and an integrated multichannel workflow, with more vendor-led support. Organizations that need clearer procurement comparators typically find Apollo easier to evaluate.
ZoomInfo vs Genesy: ZoomInfo provides deeper, enterprise-focused data and integrations suitable for large teams; Genesy is positioned more as an execution platform combining data and outreach with a newer AI layer. ZoomInfo's trade-offs are typically cost and contract rigidity; Genesy's trade-offs relate to product maturity and transparency.
Lusha vs Genesy: Lusha is commonly used as a lightweight enrichment/contact-finding tool; Genesy provides enrichment plus integrated multichannel automation. In many practical deployments, teams pair a focused enrichment tool with a sequencer; Genesy aims to reduce that stack by integrating both.

Market adoption trends (high-level)

Investor interest and market commentary indicate a trend toward AI-assisted sales automation and "AI SDR" concepts. Genesy's funding was positioned in the context of that trend.

	Genesy	Apollo.io	ZoomInfo
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Published tiers exist (self-serve entry through higher tiers)	Typically enterprise quote-based; entry packages are generally positioned at enterprise pricing levels
Best For	Teams seeking an integrated workflow: data + enrichment + multichannel outreach + AI assistance	SMB/mid-market teams wanting strong database + sequencing with transparent tiers	Larger organizations needing deep data, intent/org charts, and enterprise workflows
Key Strength	Integrated workflow; positive support sentiment; LinkedIn+email sequencing plus AI-assisted variables	Mature product, broad adoption, transparent packaging; robust outreach features	Depth of data and enterprise features; category incumbent
Key Weakness	Product maturity concerns (bugs/performance/integration); pricing opacity; limited public security attestations	Credit limits and upsell dynamics; data quality varies by segment; may require add-ons	Cost and contract complexity; potential for underutilization in some organizations