Safety Mojo

Name: Safety Mojo
Brand: Safety Mojo

Mojo AI connects people and data to improve safety behavior, reduce incident rates, and lower insurance costs.

Est 2018|Valuation $62M|Raised $19.4M|6 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 2K|FTEs 37|HQ Sandy, Utah, US

MarketsHealth & Safety

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Safety Mojo appears to differentiate: - Emphasis on AI-enabled data capture (voice/conversational forms) and AI-based scoring for pre-task plan / JSA quality. - Contractor scorecards and cross-project visibility are positioned as features for GC workflows. Where alternatives may outperform: - **SafetyCulture**: broader operational footprint, mature ecosystem, and a self-serve entry motion for smaller teams. - **HammerTech**: construction-specific workflows and an approach emphasizing broad subcontractor access. - **Procore**: for firms standardized on Procore, the integrated construction management suite can reduce tool sprawl, though it represents a broader platform choice and typically a larger investment. Adoption/market traction indicators: - The vendor highlights industry recognition from trade publications and industry lists, indicating visibility within the construction safety community but not providing an equivalent to measured market share.

	Safety Mojo	HammerTech	SafetyCulture (formerly iAuditor)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-only); 12-month agreement	Not publicly listed (quote-only; pricing scales by customer size and sites)	Free tier entry available; paid tiers negotiated or self-serve for larger features
Best For	Construction / high-risk jobsite safety workflows with AI-supported capture and subcontractor visibility	Commercial/infrastructure contractors wanting configurable safety workflows and subcontractor portals	Broad frontline inspections/issue capture across industries; strong checklist/workflow ecosystem
Key Strength	AI features (voice forms, document Q&A), pre-task plan scoring, contractor scorecards; subcontractor inclusion messaging	Construction safety platform breadth; pre-built workflows; implementation focus	Large installed base, template/checklist strengths, cross-industry footprint and feature breadth
Key Weakness	Limited public review volume; mobile sync/offline complaints; pricing transparency; some AI features require connectivity	Quote-based pricing; may require heavier implementation for fully configurable versions	Some users report offline reliability issues in inspection workflows (contextual competitor risk)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Safety Mojo appears to differentiate:

Emphasis on AI-enabled data capture (voice/conversational forms) and AI-based scoring for pre-task plan / JSA quality.
Contractor scorecards and cross-project visibility are positioned as features for GC workflows.

Where alternatives may outperform:

SafetyCulture: broader operational footprint, mature ecosystem, and a self-serve entry motion for smaller teams.
HammerTech: construction-specific workflows and an approach emphasizing broad subcontractor access.
Procore: for firms standardized on Procore, the integrated construction management suite can reduce tool sprawl, though it represents a broader platform choice and typically a larger investment.

Adoption/market traction indicators:

The vendor highlights industry recognition from trade publications and industry lists, indicating visibility within the construction safety community but not providing an equivalent to measured market share.

	Safety Mojo	HammerTech	SafetyCulture (formerly iAuditor)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-only); 12-month agreement	Not publicly listed (quote-only; pricing scales by customer size and sites)	Free tier entry available; paid tiers negotiated or self-serve for larger features
Best For	Construction / high-risk jobsite safety workflows with AI-supported capture and subcontractor visibility	Commercial/infrastructure contractors wanting configurable safety workflows and subcontractor portals	Broad frontline inspections/issue capture across industries; strong checklist/workflow ecosystem
Key Strength	AI features (voice forms, document Q&A), pre-task plan scoring, contractor scorecards; subcontractor inclusion messaging	Construction safety platform breadth; pre-built workflows; implementation focus	Large installed base, template/checklist strengths, cross-industry footprint and feature breadth
Key Weakness	Limited public review volume; mobile sync/offline complaints; pricing transparency; some AI features require connectivity	Quote-based pricing; may require heavier implementation for fully configurable versions	Some users report offline reliability issues in inspection workflows (contextual competitor risk)