Veles

Name: Veles
Brand: Veles
Rating: 5 (11 reviews)

AI Native

The Launchpad for Sales-Led Growth

Est 2023|Valuation $7.1M|Raised $2.6M|2 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 6K|FTEs 7|HQ Santa Barbara, California, US

MarketsDeal Desk / Deal Room Software CPQ Software (Configure, Price, Quote)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Direct competitors and differentiators - The vendor differentiates on three primary areas: a contract-based pricing model, AI-driven agent workflows via an MCP server, and a focus on rep-centric workflows (Slack approvals, multi-option quoting, and shorter setup claims). - Feature comparison: where Veles may excel vs. lag - Potential Veles advantages: - Presentation-layer collaboration and multi-scenario quoting, as described in a vendor case study. - Positioning for faster onboarding for smaller RevOps teams as presented in vendor materials. - Potential Veles disadvantages: - Mature enterprise requirements (complex compliance, in-depth auditability, large partner ecosystems) may favor Salesforce-native or long-established CPQ vendors. - Pricing comparison - Veles: published contract-based per-contract pricing and an introductory free allotment are referenced on vendor product pages. - Salesforce Revenue Cloud / CPQ: typically presented as per-user pricing; enterprises commonly incur additional costs for implementation, support tiers, and administrative overhead. - Customer testimonials comparing products - No direct, side-by-side customer quotes comparing Veles to other CPQ vendors were located in the captured sources. - Market share and adoption trends - No authoritative market-share data specific to Veles was found in the captured research materials. - The vendor states a user-count metric on its public site; this is a vendor-provided figure and has not been independently verified.

	Veles (vendor product site)	Salesforce Revenue Cloud / CPQ	DealHub CPQ
Starting Price	Published contract-based per-contract pricing and an introductory free allotment referenced on vendor product pages	Per-user pricing; varies by SKU and region (vendor product pages and ecosystem documentation)	Public pricing page exists; list price not clearly published on vendor pages
Best For	B2B SaaS teams prioritizing rapid setup, a rep-focused quoting interface, Slack/agent workflows, and contract-based pricing (vendor and community materials)	Organizations that are deeply standardized on Salesforce and require mature enterprise governance and ecosystem support (industry analysis and community resources)	Teams seeking a modern CPQ and deal-room experience from a vendor with broader market presence (secondary sources)
Key Strength	Contract-based pricing and AI-driven agent workflows via an MCP server integration surface (vendor documentation)	Ecosystem depth and platform extensibility within Salesforce (industry analysis)	Modern CPQ positioning and broader suite narrative (secondary sources)
Key Weakness	Early-stage maturity considerations; limited independently accessible review detail; compliance claims not verifiable from available public pages	Complexity and implementation cost/time in many implementations (widely discussed in the Salesforce community)	Public pricing opacity and fit dependent on enterprise customization and compliance needs (vendor pages and secondary sources)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Direct competitors and differentiators
- The vendor differentiates on three primary areas: a contract-based pricing model, AI-driven agent workflows via an MCP server, and a focus on rep-centric workflows (Slack approvals, multi-option quoting, and shorter setup claims).
Feature comparison: where Veles may excel vs. lag
- Potential Veles advantages:
  - Presentation-layer collaboration and multi-scenario quoting, as described in a vendor case study.
  - Positioning for faster onboarding for smaller RevOps teams as presented in vendor materials.
- Potential Veles disadvantages:
  - Mature enterprise requirements (complex compliance, in-depth auditability, large partner ecosystems) may favor Salesforce-native or long-established CPQ vendors.
Pricing comparison
- Veles: published contract-based per-contract pricing and an introductory free allotment are referenced on vendor product pages.
- Salesforce Revenue Cloud / CPQ: typically presented as per-user pricing; enterprises commonly incur additional costs for implementation, support tiers, and administrative overhead.
Customer testimonials comparing products
- No direct, side-by-side customer quotes comparing Veles to other CPQ vendors were located in the captured sources.
Market share and adoption trends
- No authoritative market-share data specific to Veles was found in the captured research materials.
- The vendor states a user-count metric on its public site; this is a vendor-provided figure and has not been independently verified.

	Veles (vendor product site)	Salesforce Revenue Cloud / CPQ	DealHub CPQ
Starting Price	Published contract-based per-contract pricing and an introductory free allotment referenced on vendor product pages	Per-user pricing; varies by SKU and region (vendor product pages and ecosystem documentation)	Public pricing page exists; list price not clearly published on vendor pages
Best For	B2B SaaS teams prioritizing rapid setup, a rep-focused quoting interface, Slack/agent workflows, and contract-based pricing (vendor and community materials)	Organizations that are deeply standardized on Salesforce and require mature enterprise governance and ecosystem support (industry analysis and community resources)	Teams seeking a modern CPQ and deal-room experience from a vendor with broader market presence (secondary sources)
Key Strength	Contract-based pricing and AI-driven agent workflows via an MCP server integration surface (vendor documentation)	Ecosystem depth and platform extensibility within Salesforce (industry analysis)	Modern CPQ positioning and broader suite narrative (secondary sources)
Key Weakness	Early-stage maturity considerations; limited independently accessible review detail; compliance claims not verifiable from available public pages	Complexity and implementation cost/time in many implementations (widely discussed in the Salesforce community)	Public pricing opacity and fit dependent on enterprise customization and compliance needs (vendor pages and secondary sources)