Gloat

Name: Gloat
Brand: Gloat
Rating: 4.5 (42 reviews)

Leader

Work Orchestration for Exponential Contributors

Est 2015|Valuation $1B|Raised $186.3M|30 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 77K|Web traffic 15K|FTEs 134|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsCareer Pathing & Succession Planning

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: where alternatives may be preferred

- Workday vs Gloat: Workday may be preferred when an organization prioritizes vendor consolidation and HRIS-native workflows. Gloat may be preferred when a buyer requires a dedicated marketplace with broader opportunity types and skills matching capabilities. - Fuel50 vs Gloat: Fuel50 may be preferable where the primary need is career pathways and internal career navigation rather than project staffing or marketplace-first workflows. - Eightfold / Phenom vs Gloat: These vendors may be more appropriate when an organization seeks combined external and internal talent intelligence or a more unified talent experience suite.

Competitor perspective (example)

Some competitors and partners publish comparative materials (for example, lists of alternatives). Such materials can be a useful shortlisting input but should be treated as vendor-originated content rather than independent benchmarking.

Adoption / market signals

Gloat is generally well rated on G2 and very highly rated on Gartner Peer Insights based on a small sample; mindshare metrics on some platforms were relatively low, possibly reflecting category taxonomy or buyer research behavior rather than absolute usage.

	Gloat	Workday (Career/internal mobility features)	Fuel50
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (custom enterprise)	Not publicly listed (suite/enterprise)	Pricing requires contact; modular purchase model shown
Best For	Large enterprises seeking a dedicated internal marketplace and a skills graph, with added work orchestration capabilities	Organizations standardized on Workday seeking internal mobility features within the HRIS	Organizations focused on career pathing, skills architecture, and modular mobility/gigs
Key Strength	Marketplace coverage (roles/gigs/mentoring/learning) and positive user experiences reported in some customer feedback	Native HRIS data and workflow integration for organizations committed to a single suite	Clear modular packaging and emphasis on career pathways and skills architecture
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; reporting and change management effort; some update governance concerns	May provide less specialized marketplace depth compared with dedicated vendors	May be relatively more expensive for some buyers and variable proof points at very large global scale depending on the buyer

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: where alternatives may be preferred

Workday vs Gloat: Workday may be preferred when an organization prioritizes vendor consolidation and HRIS-native workflows. Gloat may be preferred when a buyer requires a dedicated marketplace with broader opportunity types and skills matching capabilities.
Fuel50 vs Gloat: Fuel50 may be preferable where the primary need is career pathways and internal career navigation rather than project staffing or marketplace-first workflows.
Eightfold / Phenom vs Gloat: These vendors may be more appropriate when an organization seeks combined external and internal talent intelligence or a more unified talent experience suite.

Competitor perspective (example)

Adoption / market signals

	Gloat	Workday (Career/internal mobility features)	Fuel50
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (custom enterprise)	Not publicly listed (suite/enterprise)	Pricing requires contact; modular purchase model shown
Best For	Large enterprises seeking a dedicated internal marketplace and a skills graph, with added work orchestration capabilities	Organizations standardized on Workday seeking internal mobility features within the HRIS	Organizations focused on career pathing, skills architecture, and modular mobility/gigs
Key Strength	Marketplace coverage (roles/gigs/mentoring/learning) and positive user experiences reported in some customer feedback	Native HRIS data and workflow integration for organizations committed to a single suite	Clear modular packaging and emphasis on career pathways and skills architecture
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; reporting and change management effort; some update governance concerns	May provide less specialized marketplace depth compared with dedicated vendors	May be relatively more expensive for some buyers and variable proof points at very large global scale depending on the buyer