Google Agentspace

Name: Google Agentspace
Brand: Google

Google Agentspace is an enterprise workspace that provides a Gemini-powered chat and search interface over enterprise content, a catalog of pre-built and partner agents, a no-code Agent Designer plus an Agent Development Kit for custom agents.

Est 1998|Valuation $4081.3B|Raised $26.1M|36 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 41.9M|Website|Web traffic 3.3M|FTEs 198,933|HQ Mountain View, California, US

MarketsKnowledge Management Productivity & Collaboration Suite AI Assistant Agent Builder Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Google Agentspace (Gemini Enterprise lineage) | Microsoft 365 Copilot | Glean (enterprise AI search) | |--------|---------------|----------------|----------------| | Starting Price | Published per-seat pricing available from the vendor (see Agentspace product pages); tiered per-seat pricing published for Gemini Enterprise tiers (varies) | Published per-user pricing available from the vendor for Copilot for M365 | Typically quote-based; third-party estimates vary | | Best For | Organizations with a Google Cloud / Google Workspace orientation seeking a governed agent catalog and enterprise search with bundled Google agents | Organizations with deep Microsoft 365 usage where native Teams/SharePoint/Outlook integration is a priority | Organizations prioritizing broad SaaS connector coverage and cross-suite search with a neutral indexing layer | | Key Strength | Search capabilities derived from Google search technology; integration with Google ecosystem and governance/security controls (VPC-SC, CMEK); Google-provided agents (Deep Research, NotebookLM) | Deep native integration into Microsoft productivity services and admin tooling | Reputation for cross-app search and broad connector coverage; neutral positioning across suites | | Key Weakness | Community reports of connector maturity and administrative controls limitations for some no-code agent workflows; branding and SKU consolidation may create procurement ambiguity | Less optimal for Google-first stacks; integration outside Microsoft ecosystem can be less seamless | Pricing transparency and governance requirements at scale; still requires integration and rollout work | - Narrative analysis - Microsoft versus Google - Both vendors pursue per-seat licensing and consolidation of AI-enabled workplace capabilities. Google emphasizes search heritage and multi-agent narratives, while Microsoft emphasizes depth within Microsoft 365 and integrated workflow embedding. - Google versus Glean - Glean is often positioned as a cross-app enterprise search specialist; some evaluators report more straightforward cross-suite search behavior in Glean compared with mixed-source deployments in Agentspace. Conversely, some community feedback rates Agentspace higher than lower-level Google search APIs in answer quality. - Market share and adoption trends - No public, reliable market-share metrics specific to Agentspace were identified in accessible sources. - The consolidation into Gemini Enterprise suggests Google is simplifying go-to-market and bundling multiple capabilities under a single product front door, which may affect procurement clarity and adoption patterns.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Google Agentspace (Gemini Enterprise lineage)	Microsoft 365 Copilot	Glean (enterprise AI search)
Starting Price	Published per-seat pricing available from the vendor (see Agentspace product pages); tiered per-seat pricing published for Gemini Enterprise tiers (varies)	Published per-user pricing available from the vendor for Copilot for M365	Typically quote-based; third-party estimates vary
Best For	Organizations with a Google Cloud / Google Workspace orientation seeking a governed agent catalog and enterprise search with bundled Google agents	Organizations with deep Microsoft 365 usage where native Teams/SharePoint/Outlook integration is a priority	Organizations prioritizing broad SaaS connector coverage and cross-suite search with a neutral indexing layer
Key Strength	Search capabilities derived from Google search technology; integration with Google ecosystem and governance/security controls (VPC-SC, CMEK); Google-provided agents (Deep Research, NotebookLM)	Deep native integration into Microsoft productivity services and admin tooling	Reputation for cross-app search and broad connector coverage; neutral positioning across suites
Key Weakness	Community reports of connector maturity and administrative controls limitations for some no-code agent workflows; branding and SKU consolidation may create procurement ambiguity	Less optimal for Google-first stacks; integration outside Microsoft ecosystem can be less seamless	Pricing transparency and governance requirements at scale; still requires integration and rollout work

Narrative analysis
- Microsoft versus Google
  - Both vendors pursue per-seat licensing and consolidation of AI-enabled workplace capabilities. Google emphasizes search heritage and multi-agent narratives, while Microsoft emphasizes depth within Microsoft 365 and integrated workflow embedding.
- Google versus Glean
  - Glean is often positioned as a cross-app enterprise search specialist; some evaluators report more straightforward cross-suite search behavior in Glean compared with mixed-source deployments in Agentspace. Conversely, some community feedback rates Agentspace higher than lower-level Google search APIs in answer quality.
Market share and adoption trends
- No public, reliable market-share metrics specific to Agentspace were identified in accessible sources.
- The consolidation into Gemini Enterprise suggests Google is simplifying go-to-market and bundling multiple capabilities under a single product front door, which may affect procurement clarity and adoption patterns.

Aspect

Google Agentspace (Gemini Enterprise lineage)

Microsoft 365 Copilot

Glean (enterprise AI search)

Starting Price

Published per-seat pricing available from the vendor (see Agentspace product pages); tiered per-seat pricing published for Gemini Enterprise tiers (varies)

Published per-user pricing available from the vendor for Copilot for M365

Typically quote-based; third-party estimates vary

Best For

Organizations with a Google Cloud / Google Workspace orientation seeking a governed agent catalog and enterprise search with bundled Google agents

Organizations with deep Microsoft 365 usage where native Teams/SharePoint/Outlook integration is a priority

Organizations prioritizing broad SaaS connector coverage and cross-suite search with a neutral indexing layer

Key Strength

Search capabilities derived from Google search technology; integration with Google ecosystem and governance/security controls (VPC-SC, CMEK); Google-provided agents (Deep Research, NotebookLM)

Deep native integration into Microsoft productivity services and admin tooling

Reputation for cross-app search and broad connector coverage; neutral positioning across suites

Key Weakness

Community reports of connector maturity and administrative controls limitations for some no-code agent workflows; branding and SKU consolidation may create procurement ambiguity

Less optimal for Google-first stacks; integration outside Microsoft ecosystem can be less seamless

Pricing transparency and governance requirements at scale; still requires integration and rollout work