Security and Identity

Name: Security and Identity
Brand: Google

Security and Identity is a Google Cloud portfolio that provides identity and access management, workforce and workload identity federation, cloud posture and threat detection, and data-perimeter controls to secure cloud and multi-cloud workloads.

Est 1998|Valuation $4081.3B|Raised $26.1M

LinkedIn 41.9M|Website|Web traffic 3.3M|FTEs 198,933|HQ Mountain View, California, US

Published Oct 12, 2026

01Common complaints

Company sizes or stages where this product is overkill or insufficient
- Early-stage startups with few engineers may find the IAM/org model and portfolio breadth heavy relative to needs.
Industries or use cases where competitors are clearly superior
- Microsoft-first enterprises may get faster time-to-value from Entra ID + Defender for Cloud due to existing licensing and ecosystem alignment.
- Organizations wanting a dedicated, cloud-agnostic CNAPP control plane may prefer third-party CNAPP vendors, depending on workflow maturity and connectors.
Technical requirements that this product cannot meet
- If buyers require uniform policy enforcement semantics across AWS/Azure/GCP via a single native console, they will likely need third-party layers; Google’s federation and SCC multi-cloud features still have product-by-product limitations documented.
Budget constraints that make alternatives more appropriate
- If per-user identity licensing needs to be highly predictable and consolidated, Entra’s per-user pricing can be simpler than Google’s split across Workspace billing + MAU pricing + SCC tiers.
Specific workflows or integrations where the product falls short
- Some services have identity federation limitations (documented), which can block standardized federation patterns across all teams.
Red flags in the buying process
- Access Approval can slow support interactions if the team cannot staff an approval on-call.
- If an organization cannot establish a clean Cloud Identity/Workspace org model, they may face ongoing admin friction.
Current limitations acknowledged by the vendor
- IAM Conditions
  - Conditions cannot be used with basic roles (Owner/Editor/Viewer) and cannot be used for grants to allUsers/allAuthenticatedUsers.
- Identity federation
  - Google documents product-by-product federation limitations and varying levels of support across Google Cloud products.
- VPC Service Controls
  - Documented limitations exist in specific products (e.g., Cloud Run notes limitations around continuous deployment inside a perimeter and principal-based ingress rules under certain invocation modes).
- Access Approval
  - Google explicitly warns support response times may increase while waiting for approval.
Features on the roadmap (not yet available) - note estimated dates if available
- This pass did not capture a consolidated roadmap with dates for the full "Security & Identity" portfolio.
Scale limitations (at what volume/size does it break down?)
- The primary "scale" challenge reported publicly is governance complexity at organizational scale rather than raw performance. Organizations often need automation, standardized role catalogs, and auditing to keep IAM manageable.
Security or compliance gaps
- Product-specific certification coverage is not always easily discoverable from the product page. Buyers should validate required attestations for each in-scope service.
Technical debt or architectural limitations mentioned in reviews
- Community sources emphasize confusion and complexity (org setup, IAM) rather than legacy technical debt.
API limitations or integration constraints
- Identity federation limitations for CLI/APIs are explicitly documented on a per-product basis.

- Company sizes or stages where this product is overkill or insufficient - Early-stage startups with few engineers may find the IAM/org model and portfolio breadth heavy relative to needs. - Industries or use cases where competitors are clearly superior - Microsoft-first enterprises may get faster time-to-value from Entra ID + Defender for Cloud due to existing licensing and ecosystem alignment. - Organizations wanting a dedicated, cloud-agnostic CNAPP control plane may prefer third-party CNAPP vendors, depending on workflow maturity and connectors. - Technical requirements that this product cannot meet - If buyers require uniform policy enforcement semantics across AWS/Azure/GCP via a single native console, they will likely need third-party layers; Google’s federation and SCC multi-cloud features still have product-by-product limitations documented. - Budget constraints that make alternatives more appropriate - If per-user identity licensing needs to be highly predictable and consolidated, Entra’s per-user pricing can be simpler than Google’s split across Workspace billing + MAU pricing + SCC tiers. - Specific workflows or integrations where the product falls short - Some services have identity federation limitations (documented), which can block standardized federation patterns across all teams. - Red flags in the buying process - Access Approval can slow support interactions if the team cannot staff an approval on-call. - If an organization cannot establish a clean Cloud Identity/Workspace org model, they may face ongoing admin friction. - Current limitations acknowledged by the vendor - IAM Conditions - Conditions cannot be used with basic roles (Owner/Editor/Viewer) and cannot be used for grants to allUsers/allAuthenticatedUsers. - Identity federation - Google documents product-by-product federation limitations and varying levels of support across Google Cloud products. - VPC Service Controls - Documented limitations exist in specific products (e.g., Cloud Run notes limitations around continuous deployment inside a perimeter and principal-based ingress rules under certain invocation modes). - Access Approval - Google explicitly warns support response times may increase while waiting for approval. - Features on the roadmap (not yet available) - note estimated dates if available - This pass did not capture a consolidated roadmap with dates for the full "Security & Identity" portfolio. - Scale limitations (at what volume/size does it break down?) - The primary "scale" challenge reported publicly is governance complexity at organizational scale rather than raw performance. Organizations often need automation, standardized role catalogs, and auditing to keep IAM manageable. - Security or compliance gaps - Product-specific certification coverage is not always easily discoverable from the product page. Buyers should validate required attestations for each in-scope service. - Technical debt or architectural limitations mentioned in reviews - Community sources emphasize confusion and complexity (org setup, IAM) rather than legacy technical debt. - API limitations or integration constraints - Identity federation limitations for CLI/APIs are explicitly documented on a per-product basis.

Why some customers left for competitors (churn reasons)

Public review snippets accessible in this pass do not reliably enumerate churn reasons; community discussions indicate churn-like drivers are often:
- IAM model confusion at scale
- Preference for a centralized third-party IdP (Okta/Entra) for workforce identity
- Desire for a consolidated multi-cloud CNAPP experience where Microsoft Defender for Cloud / Wiz / Prisma may be perceived as stronger depending on environment

02Why they buy

Competitive advantages validated by customer feedback (not just vendor claims)
- Community feedback frequently highlights Workload Identity Federation as valuable for keyless authentication and reducing credential risk; those statements are anecdotal and should be validated in pilots.
Unique features and capabilities competitors lack
- Access Approval + Access Transparency provide customers explicit control and visibility into provider personnel access.
- VPC Service Controls provides a perimeter security model designed to mitigate data exfiltration even when credentials are compromised.
Differentiation from competitors based on reviews
- Differentiation in community discussions tends to be architectural (resource hierarchy, IAM model) rather than claims about superior support or UX.
Value propositions with evidence from case studies
- Vendor-cited testimonials exist (e.g., Assured Workloads), but metrics are typically not independently validated in public.
Areas where competitors clearly have advantages (be balanced)
- Entra ID: clearer list pricing and deep Windows/M365 integration.
- Okta: standalone identity focus and broad SaaS ecosystem.
- CNAPP specialists: faster multi-cloud onboarding and unified posture views depending on vendor.

- Competitive advantages validated by customer feedback (not just vendor claims) - Community feedback frequently highlights Workload Identity Federation as valuable for keyless authentication and reducing credential risk; those statements are anecdotal and should be validated in pilots. - Unique features and capabilities competitors lack - Access Approval + Access Transparency provide customers explicit control and visibility into provider personnel access. - VPC Service Controls provides a perimeter security model designed to mitigate data exfiltration even when credentials are compromised. - Differentiation from competitors based on reviews - Differentiation in community discussions tends to be architectural (resource hierarchy, IAM model) rather than claims about superior support or UX. - Value propositions with evidence from case studies - Vendor-cited testimonials exist (e.g., Assured Workloads), but metrics are typically not independently validated in public. - Areas where competitors clearly have advantages (be balanced) - Entra ID: clearer list pricing and deep Windows/M365 integration. - Okta: standalone identity focus and broad SaaS ecosystem. - CNAPP specialists: faster multi-cloud onboarding and unified posture views depending on vendor.

Why customers chose this product over alternatives (as inferred from reviews/discussions)

Integration with Google Cloud resource hierarchy, project/folder/org model, and platform-native RBAC.
Workload Identity Federation cited as a way to avoid long-lived service account keys (a common security objective), especially for CI/CD and multi-cloud workloads.

03Field reports

Vendor-published positioning (not independently validated)
- Security Command Center product overview and feature pages assert they provide security controls for Google Cloud environments and AI-stack protection; these are vendor marketing claims and should be validated through pilots and customer references.
Example: Assured Workloads testimonial (vendor page)
- The Assured Workloads vendor testimonial includes a customer quote: "We chose to deploy with Google Cloud Assured Workloads because it provides us with the security controls we need and helps address a wide range of compliance requirements."
- Critical evaluation
  - This is a vendor-curated testimonial; no methodology, peer benchmark, or counterfactual comparison is provided.
  - The quote doesn’t quantify implementation cost, time-to-compliance, or residual controls the customer still had to build.
Example: Identity and access findings in SCC
- Official SCC documentation describes the "Identity view" and identity/access findings sources including CIEM, IAM recommender, Security Health Analytics, and Event Threat Detection, and notes cross-cloud environments (for example, other cloud providers).
- Critical evaluation
  - This is an architectural detail; buyers should validate coverage for their exact services, identities (human and non-human), and multi-cloud topology.

- Vendor-published positioning (not independently validated) - Security Command Center product overview and feature pages assert they provide security controls for Google Cloud environments and AI-stack protection; these are vendor marketing claims and should be validated through pilots and customer references. - Example: Assured Workloads testimonial (vendor page) - The Assured Workloads vendor testimonial includes a customer quote: "We chose to deploy with Google Cloud Assured Workloads because it provides us with the security controls we need and helps address a wide range of compliance requirements." - Critical evaluation - This is a vendor-curated testimonial; no methodology, peer benchmark, or counterfactual comparison is provided. - The quote doesn’t quantify implementation cost, time-to-compliance, or residual controls the customer still had to build. - Example: Identity and access findings in SCC - Official SCC documentation describes the "Identity view" and identity/access findings sources including CIEM, IAM recommender, Security Health Analytics, and Event Threat Detection, and notes cross-cloud environments (for example, other cloud providers). - Critical evaluation - This is an architectural detail; buyers should validate coverage for their exact services, identities (human and non-human), and multi-cloud topology.

Notes on review-source accessibility

Gartner Peer Insights pages are accessible but can be intermittently gated; in this research pass, product review landing pages for Google Cloud IAM and Google Cloud Identity and Access Management were located.

Review platforms: examples (positive and negative)

G2 — Google Cloud Identity (workforce identity)
- G2 describes Cloud Identity as "a unified identity, access, app, and device management (IAM/EMM) platform" focused on end-user efficiency and data protection (product description and review hub).
TrustRadius — Google Cloud Identity
- TrustRadius lists Google Cloud Identity and shows a favorable score with a small review sample on the captured page; the vendor is presented as providing unified identity, access, SSO, MFA, and endpoint policy enforcement.
Gartner Peer Insights — Google Cloud Identity and Access Management / Google Cloud IAM
- Gartner Peer Insights provides review pages for Google Cloud IAM and the broader "Google Cloud Identity and Access Management" market, indicating the presence of peer reviews and downloadable vendor/customer PDFs.

- G2 — Google Cloud Identity (workforce identity) - G2 describes Cloud Identity as "a unified identity, access, app, and device management (IAM/EMM) platform" focused on end-user efficiency and data protection (product description and review hub). - TrustRadius — Google Cloud Identity - TrustRadius lists Google Cloud Identity and shows a favorable score with a small review sample on the captured page; the vendor is presented as providing unified identity, access, SSO, MFA, and endpoint policy enforcement. - Gartner Peer Insights — Google Cloud Identity and Access Management / Google Cloud IAM - Gartner Peer Insights provides review pages for Google Cloud IAM and the broader "Google Cloud Identity and Access Management" market, indicating the presence of peer reviews and downloadable vendor/customer PDFs.

Community and social (direct quotes; balanced)

Complexity / learning curve
- Reddit user complaint: "Am I the only who finds IAM … too confusing?" and replies note IAM is "more complex than the basic IT of managing your VM’s," with some counterpoint that Google’s hierarchy can be easier to manage than a collection of AWS accounts (mixed sentiment).
- Reddit rant: "Useless Complexity in setting up a Google Cloud account" mentions potentially needing Cloud Identity Free to manage org user identities and frustration with confusing terminology.
Organization / Cloud Identity prerequisites
- Reddit guidance: "Cloud identity Free is required" for certain org-level "Security" pages and admin experiences; recommendation to have an "organization while learning and experimenting the security features."
Real incident / billing-drain narrative (identity exposure)
- Reddit post: "significant funds drained from my Google Cloud account in a short period — full forensic breakdown…" emphasizes API key exposure risks and argues users must actively manage and audit their API keys, with commenters suggesting federated identity and IAP to reduce exposure.

- Complexity / learning curve - Reddit user complaint: "Am I the only who finds IAM … too confusing?" and replies note IAM is "more complex than the basic IT of managing your VM’s," with some counterpoint that Google’s hierarchy can be easier to manage than a collection of AWS accounts (mixed sentiment). - Reddit rant: "Useless Complexity in setting up a Google Cloud account" mentions potentially needing Cloud Identity Free to manage org user identities and frustration with confusing terminology. - Organization / Cloud Identity prerequisites - Reddit guidance: "Cloud identity Free is required" for certain org-level "Security" pages and admin experiences; recommendation to have an "organization while learning and experimenting the security features." - Real incident / billing-drain narrative (identity exposure) - Reddit post: "significant funds drained from my Google Cloud account in a short period — full forensic breakdown…" emphasizes API key exposure risks and argues users must actively manage and audit their API keys, with commenters suggesting federated identity and IAP to reduce exposure.

Specific outcomes customers achieved (with metrics when available)

Most publicly visible "outcome metrics" in this portfolio tend to be vendor-published case studies; independent, quantified metrics in accessible peer reviews were limited in this pass.

Deal-breakers and reasons customers didn't purchase

Access Approval operational tradeoff: enabling it can increase support response time because approvals can delay support.
Organizations that don’t want Workspace/Cloud Identity admin console overhead may resist adopting Cloud Identity, preferring Entra/Okta as the source of truth.

04Best fit

Company sizes: generalized employee and revenue ranges
- Mid-market to enterprise
  - Organizations with a substantial and growing engineering and operations headcount
  - Companies with mid-market to very large enterprise revenue profiles
- Also fits startups with strong security engineering teams, though the solution can be overkill for very small teams seeking minimal overhead
Industries and verticals where adoption is strongest (with customer examples)
- Regulated sectors and public sector patterns are implied by Assured Workloads positioning:
  - Government, financial services, healthcare, and other sovereignty/regulatory-driven organizations
Roles and personas: decision makers AND end users
- Decision makers
  - CISO / VP Security
  - Head of Cloud Platform / Infrastructure
  - IAM Program Owner
- End users
  - Cloud security engineers
  - Platform engineers / SRE
  - SOC analysts (SCC + SecOps integrations)
  - Identity engineers (federation, directory sync)
Pain points and challenges the product addresses
- Overly permissive access and the need for least privilege
- Key management risk (service account key sprawl)
- Data exfiltration risk beyond identity (perimeter controls)
- Governance of privileged vendor access (vendor personnel access)
Qualification criteria: what makes a GREAT fit
- Significant footprint on Google Cloud (or a clear strategic intent to adopt it)
- Need for workload federation across CI/CD, multicloud, or on-prem
- Willingness to invest in IAM design and automation
- Compliance needs that map to Assured Workloads and admin-access governance requirements
Deal disqualifiers: what makes a POOR fit
- Very small teams wanting a simple “set-and-forget” IAM approach without governance investment
- Organizations insisting on a single third-party IdP standard for all apps with minimal directory/Cloud Identity administration
Real customer examples with company names when available
- Vendor pages include generic testimonial quotes, but this analysis did not find verifiable named customer case studies explicitly tied to "Security & Identity" as a discrete portfolio.

- Company sizes: generalized employee and revenue ranges - Mid-market to enterprise - Organizations with a substantial and growing engineering and operations headcount - Companies with mid-market to very large enterprise revenue profiles - Also fits startups with strong security engineering teams, though the solution can be overkill for very small teams seeking minimal overhead - Industries and verticals where adoption is strongest (with customer examples) - Regulated sectors and public sector patterns are implied by Assured Workloads positioning: - Government, financial services, healthcare, and other sovereignty/regulatory-driven organizations - Roles and personas: decision makers AND end users - Decision makers - CISO / VP Security - Head of Cloud Platform / Infrastructure - IAM Program Owner - End users - Cloud security engineers - Platform engineers / SRE - SOC analysts (SCC + SecOps integrations) - Identity engineers (federation, directory sync) - Pain points and challenges the product addresses - Overly permissive access and the need for least privilege - Key management risk (service account key sprawl) - Data exfiltration risk beyond identity (perimeter controls) - Governance of privileged vendor access (vendor personnel access) - Qualification criteria: what makes a GREAT fit - Significant footprint on Google Cloud (or a clear strategic intent to adopt it) - Need for workload federation across CI/CD, multicloud, or on-prem - Willingness to invest in IAM design and automation - Compliance needs that map to Assured Workloads and admin-access governance requirements - Deal disqualifiers: what makes a POOR fit - Very small teams wanting a simple “set-and-forget” IAM approach without governance investment - Organizations insisting on a single third-party IdP standard for all apps with minimal directory/Cloud Identity administration - Real customer examples with company names when available - Vendor pages include generic testimonial quotes, but this analysis did not find verifiable named customer case studies explicitly tied to "Security & Identity" as a discrete portfolio.

05The pitch

What the product does (core value proposition in objective terms)

"Security and Identity" on Google Cloud is an umbrella portfolio rather than a single SKU. It spans identity (workforce and customer), access control, cloud posture/risk management, threat detection/response, and data-perimeter controls—intended to help enterprises secure Google Cloud workloads and, increasingly, multi-cloud environments.
Representative products that commonly fall under this umbrella include:
- Identity and access: Cloud IAM, Cloud Identity (workforce directory/SSO/MFA/endpoint basics), Workforce Identity Federation, Workload Identity Federation
- Posture/risk: Security Command Center (SCC)
- Data/perimeter controls: VPC Service Controls
- Admin-access governance: Access Transparency / Access Approval

- "Security and Identity" on Google Cloud is an umbrella portfolio rather than a single SKU. It spans identity (workforce and customer), access control, cloud posture/risk management, threat detection/response, and data-perimeter controls—intended to help enterprises secure Google Cloud workloads and, increasingly, multi-cloud environments. - Representative products that commonly fall under this umbrella include: - Identity and access: Cloud IAM, Cloud Identity (workforce directory/SSO/MFA/endpoint basics), Workforce Identity Federation, Workload Identity Federation - Posture/risk: Security Command Center (SCC) - Data/perimeter controls: VPC Service Controls - Admin-access governance: Access Transparency / Access Approval

Target market and market positioning

Primary audience: security, platform, and cloud engineering teams running workloads on Google Cloud; also includes organizations running hybrid/multi-cloud that want federated access (Workforce/Workload Identity Federation) and posture visibility (SCC Enterprise supports multi-cloud).
Positioning themes (vendor-stated): claims of providing security for Google Cloud environments and protection across the AI stack for SCC, and layered controls across identity, perimeters, and monitoring.

- Primary audience: security, platform, and cloud engineering teams running workloads on Google Cloud; also includes organizations running hybrid/multi-cloud that want federated access (Workforce/Workload Identity Federation) and posture visibility (SCC Enterprise supports multi-cloud). - Positioning themes (vendor-stated): claims of providing security for Google Cloud environments and protection across the AI stack for SCC, and layered controls across identity, perimeters, and monitoring.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Security and Identity including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →