Graft

Name: Graft
Brand: Graft

AI Native

Graft's Intelligence Layer equips your teams with instant, trusted answers so they can drive success.

Est 2021|Valuation $42.5M|Raised $14.5M

LinkedIn 2K|Website|FTEs 19|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsKnowledge Management AI Assistant

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Versus Microsoft 365 Copilot: Copilot offers an advantage when an organization is heavily invested in the Microsoft ecosystem (SharePoint/Teams/Outlook/Office). Graft is positioned as an independent answer layer with multi-source connectors and citation capabilities. - Versus Atlassian Rovo Dev: Rovo Dev focuses on developer workflows and is priced per developer. Graft overlaps in engineering use cases but is positioned to be broader across enterprise knowledge sources beyond the Atlassian toolchain. - Versus Glean: Glean is a competitor in enterprise search/Work AI with broader market traction. Graft’s published pricing may enable faster evaluation for some buyers, while Glean’s differentiator is ecosystem adoption and product maturity.

	Graft	Microsoft 365 Copilot	Atlassian Rovo Dev
Starting Price	Published entry-tier pricing (low-cost entry option), plus published mid-tier and team tiers (hundreds to thousands/month)	Vendor-published enterprise pricing (per-user)	Vendor-published developer pricing (per-developer)
Well-suited for	Organizations seeking an answer engine across multiple data sources with citation-aware responses and published entry pricing	Organizations standardized on Microsoft 365 seeking native integrations and Microsoft-managed controls	Development teams using the Atlassian toolchain that want integrated AI across dev workflows
Key Strength	Published entry-level pricing and connector options; emphasis on cited answers and optional single-tenant/custom deployments	Deep integration with Microsoft 365 applications and vendor-managed enterprise controls	Workflows and features aligned to Jira/Bitbucket and developer lifecycle activities
Key Weakness	Sparse public third-party review coverage; some enterprise security documentation is gated; post-acquisition roadmap risk	Potential cost and lock-in for organizations not committed to the Microsoft stack	Value is strongest within Atlassian toolchain; less value outside that ecosystem

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Versus Microsoft 365 Copilot: Copilot offers an advantage when an organization is heavily invested in the Microsoft ecosystem (SharePoint/Teams/Outlook/Office). Graft is positioned as an independent answer layer with multi-source connectors and citation capabilities.
Versus Atlassian Rovo Dev: Rovo Dev focuses on developer workflows and is priced per developer. Graft overlaps in engineering use cases but is positioned to be broader across enterprise knowledge sources beyond the Atlassian toolchain.
Versus Glean: Glean is a competitor in enterprise search/Work AI with broader market traction. Graft’s published pricing may enable faster evaluation for some buyers, while Glean’s differentiator is ecosystem adoption and product maturity.

	Graft	Microsoft 365 Copilot	Atlassian Rovo Dev
Starting Price	Published entry-tier pricing (low-cost entry option), plus published mid-tier and team tiers (hundreds to thousands/month)	Vendor-published enterprise pricing (per-user)	Vendor-published developer pricing (per-developer)
Well-suited for	Organizations seeking an answer engine across multiple data sources with citation-aware responses and published entry pricing	Organizations standardized on Microsoft 365 seeking native integrations and Microsoft-managed controls	Development teams using the Atlassian toolchain that want integrated AI across dev workflows
Key Strength	Published entry-level pricing and connector options; emphasis on cited answers and optional single-tenant/custom deployments	Deep integration with Microsoft 365 applications and vendor-managed enterprise controls	Workflows and features aligned to Jira/Bitbucket and developer lifecycle activities
Key Weakness	Sparse public third-party review coverage; some enterprise security documentation is gated; post-acquisition roadmap risk	Potential cost and lock-in for organizations not committed to the Microsoft stack	Value is strongest within Atlassian toolchain; less value outside that ecosystem