Graneet

Name: Graneet
Brand: Graneet

AI Native

Graneet, la solution pour protéger la rentabilité des PME du BTP, du bureau au chantier.

Est 2020|Valuation $32.9M|Raised $11.5M

LinkedIn 7K|Website|Web traffic 7K|FTEs 61|HQ Paris, Île-de-France, FR

MarketsERP

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

#### Direct competitors and differentiators - Graneet vs Obat/Tolteck (light tools): Graneet is oriented toward SMEs with multi-job profitability control and purchasing/labor planning. Obat focuses on invoice/quote simplicity and price libraries for smaller operators. - Graneet vs ProGBat: ProGBat publishes low entry pricing and includes many BTP-specific constructs; Graneet may differentiate on product coherence and controls, but hands-on validation is needed. - Graneet vs Procore / Vista / IFS / Acumatica: These are larger, enterprise-grade tools that excel in breadth, integrations, and ecosystem, and are generally heavier and more complex than SME-focused French ERPs. #### Pricing comparison The difference between a published Graneet price listing and ProGBat’s published low tiers suggests Graneet targets larger SMEs or that the listing represents a specific package; vendor confirmation of pricing structure is recommended. #### Market share and adoption trends - The vendor states broad usage, and press coverage indicating recent funding suggests investor confidence, but no independent market share data was identified in the reviewed sources. #### When customers choose competitors instead (and why) Common decision patterns (to be validated via references): - Choose Obat/Tolteck for minimal setup and quote/invoice functionality. - Choose ProGBat for broad BTP features at a lower public price point. - Choose Procore or enterprise ERP for deep project management, document control, or complex integrations across large organizations.

	Graneet	Obat	ProGBat
Starting Price	Published per-user pricing listed on vendor/product listing (vendor confirmation recommended)	Public pricing page exists (check Obat “tarifs”)	Public pricing tiers published by the vendor (verify current terms)
Best For	Construction SMEs needing margin control, purchasing, progress invoicing, workforce planning	Artisans/TPE needing fast quotes & invoices and an included price library; lighter-weight	Small-to-mid contractors wanting estimating + invoicing + purchasing + planning + profitability, with lower listed entry pricing
Key Strength	Construction-specific ERP approach focused on job profitability and process controls	Simplicity and speed for basic construction documents; included price library	Aggressive pricing and broad BTP features across tiers
Key Weakness	Limited public documentation on security/compliance features; limited third-party user review visibility	May be too lightweight for multi-site SMEs needing full job-cost controls	UX/UX and scalability vs modern SaaS may vary; concurrent licensing models can constrain teams

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Direct competitors and differentiators

Graneet vs Obat/Tolteck (light tools): Graneet is oriented toward SMEs with multi-job profitability control and purchasing/labor planning. Obat focuses on invoice/quote simplicity and price libraries for smaller operators.
Graneet vs ProGBat: ProGBat publishes low entry pricing and includes many BTP-specific constructs; Graneet may differentiate on product coherence and controls, but hands-on validation is needed.
Graneet vs Procore / Vista / IFS / Acumatica: These are larger, enterprise-grade tools that excel in breadth, integrations, and ecosystem, and are generally heavier and more complex than SME-focused French ERPs.

Pricing comparison

The difference between a published Graneet price listing and ProGBat’s published low tiers suggests Graneet targets larger SMEs or that the listing represents a specific package; vendor confirmation of pricing structure is recommended.

Market share and adoption trends

The vendor states broad usage, and press coverage indicating recent funding suggests investor confidence, but no independent market share data was identified in the reviewed sources.

When customers choose competitors instead (and why)

Common decision patterns (to be validated via references):

Choose Obat/Tolteck for minimal setup and quote/invoice functionality.
Choose ProGBat for broad BTP features at a lower public price point.
Choose Procore or enterprise ERP for deep project management, document control, or complex integrations across large organizations.

	Graneet	Obat	ProGBat
Starting Price	Published per-user pricing listed on vendor/product listing (vendor confirmation recommended)	Public pricing page exists (check Obat “tarifs”)	Public pricing tiers published by the vendor (verify current terms)
Best For	Construction SMEs needing margin control, purchasing, progress invoicing, workforce planning	Artisans/TPE needing fast quotes & invoices and an included price library; lighter-weight	Small-to-mid contractors wanting estimating + invoicing + purchasing + planning + profitability, with lower listed entry pricing
Key Strength	Construction-specific ERP approach focused on job profitability and process controls	Simplicity and speed for basic construction documents; included price library	Aggressive pricing and broad BTP features across tiers
Key Weakness	Limited public documentation on security/compliance features; limited third-party user review visibility	May be too lightweight for multi-site SMEs needing full job-cost controls	UX/UX and scalability vs modern SaaS may vary; concurrent licensing models can constrain teams