Guidde

Name: Guidde
Brand: Guidde
Rating: 4.8 (72 reviews)

AI Native

AI adoption platform turning workflows into instant video documentation. Trusted by 4,500+ organizations globally.

Est 2020|Valuation $253M|Raised $80.6M|32 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 12K|Web traffic 352K|FTEs 88|HQ Belmont, CA

MarketsVideo Editing Software Video Generation Software

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Guidde vs Scribe: The core differentiation is output format and automation depth. Scribe is typically oriented toward text-first process documentation at team-friendly pricing. Guidde focuses on video-first outputs with AI narration and redaction features, typically positioned at higher pricing tiers. - Guidde vs DAPs (WalkMe/Whatfix): Guidde primarily provides content generation and distribution, while digital adoption platforms focus on in-product overlays and rule-based targeting with heavier implementation and governance requirements. - Guidde vs iorad: Vendor-authored comparisons position Guidde for enterprise readiness; such comparisons should be treated as vendor marketing and validated independently.

Adoption / market traction signals

Public reporting referenced an installed base figure reported in early 2025; the vendor has publicly claimed an installed base comprising multiple thousands of organizations and a large user base. Such numbers should be validated in procurement due diligence.
Vendor social posts reference review counts and high ratings; confirm review counts and ratings directly on review platforms.

	Guidde	Scribe	Loom
Starting Price	Free tier with limited videos; published per-creator pricing available from the vendor	Free tier available; published per-seat and team-bundle pricing available from the vendor	Positioning as a lower-cost basic recording tool (pricing varies)
Typical Output	Branded video workflow documentation with automated step/storyline generation	Text and screenshot workflow documentation (SOPs)	Async screen recording with human narration and simple sharing
Key Strength	Automation that generates video output and enterprise features such as SSO and redaction (higher tiers)	Cost-effective team pricing for text-first SOPs	Lightweight recording and sharing workflows for quick communications
Key Weakness	Automation may mis-capture steps in complex UIs; per-creator pricing can be costly at scale	Less focused on video-first AI narration and translation features	Limited automation for structured process documentation and weaker redaction/compliance tooling

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Guidde vs Scribe: The core differentiation is output format and automation depth. Scribe is typically oriented toward text-first process documentation at team-friendly pricing. Guidde focuses on video-first outputs with AI narration and redaction features, typically positioned at higher pricing tiers.
Guidde vs DAPs (WalkMe/Whatfix): Guidde primarily provides content generation and distribution, while digital adoption platforms focus on in-product overlays and rule-based targeting with heavier implementation and governance requirements.
Guidde vs iorad: Vendor-authored comparisons position Guidde for enterprise readiness; such comparisons should be treated as vendor marketing and validated independently.

Adoption / market traction signals

Public reporting referenced an installed base figure reported in early 2025; the vendor has publicly claimed an installed base comprising multiple thousands of organizations and a large user base. Such numbers should be validated in procurement due diligence.
Vendor social posts reference review counts and high ratings; confirm review counts and ratings directly on review platforms.

	Guidde	Scribe	Loom
Starting Price	Free tier with limited videos; published per-creator pricing available from the vendor	Free tier available; published per-seat and team-bundle pricing available from the vendor	Positioning as a lower-cost basic recording tool (pricing varies)
Typical Output	Branded video workflow documentation with automated step/storyline generation	Text and screenshot workflow documentation (SOPs)	Async screen recording with human narration and simple sharing
Key Strength	Automation that generates video output and enterprise features such as SSO and redaction (higher tiers)	Cost-effective team pricing for text-first SOPs	Lightweight recording and sharing workflows for quick communications
Key Weakness	Automation may mis-capture steps in complex UIs; per-creator pricing can be costly at scale	Less focused on video-first AI narration and translation features	Limited automation for structured process documentation and weaker redaction/compliance tooling