Haiper

Name: Haiper
Brand: Haiper

AI Native

Bring your visions to Haiper Reality

Est 2021|Valuation $101.9M|Raised $32.6M

LinkedIn 9K|Web traffic 151K|FTEs 15|HQ London, England, GB

MarketsVideo Generation Software

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Haiper relative to Runway: Runway is positioned as an integrated creative platform combining generative features and editing. Haiper’s publicly documented unit pricing for API usage may be an advantage for procurement teams seeking transparent per-usage costs. - Haiper relative to Luma: Luma publishes consumer pricing and plan benefits; Haiper’s official documentation emphasizes API unit costs, while some third-party sources show inconsistent consumer pricing summaries. - Other emerging tools: User comparisons in review content cite quality differences between Haiper and alternative tools; those user opinions are not controlled benchmarks.

Adoption trends

Press coverage positioned Haiper among a set of AI video startups responding to demand for generative video capabilities. Public sentiment sources (review platforms and discussion forums) indicate user reports of access instability and billing/support concerns, which can affect adoption among creators even if model capability is competitive.

	Haiper	Runway	Luma Dream Machine
Starting Price	API: per-second rates and web credit pricing reported in official docs (unit pricing examples in vendor documentation)	Free tier available; paid plans start at published per-user rates	Free tier available; consumer plans published with month-to-month options
Best For	Developers embedding per-second API video generation and teams generating short clips	Creators and teams needing an integrated creative suite combining generation and editing	Creators seeking consumer-facing credit plans for short-form generation
Key Strength	Public unit pricing for API usage; documented credit economics for web usage	Integrated creative toolset combining editing and generative features	Consumer-focused plan clarity and up-resolution options in published consumer tiers
Key Weakness	Public review sentiment indicates risks related to billing and support; consumer access continuity is uncertain in some reports	Pricing complexity at scale and potential need for higher tiers for enterprise features	Short duration limits and variability in output quality similar to other AI video tools

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Haiper relative to Runway: Runway is positioned as an integrated creative platform combining generative features and editing. Haiper’s publicly documented unit pricing for API usage may be an advantage for procurement teams seeking transparent per-usage costs.
Haiper relative to Luma: Luma publishes consumer pricing and plan benefits; Haiper’s official documentation emphasizes API unit costs, while some third-party sources show inconsistent consumer pricing summaries.
Other emerging tools: User comparisons in review content cite quality differences between Haiper and alternative tools; those user opinions are not controlled benchmarks.

Adoption trends

	Haiper	Runway	Luma Dream Machine
Starting Price	API: per-second rates and web credit pricing reported in official docs (unit pricing examples in vendor documentation)	Free tier available; paid plans start at published per-user rates	Free tier available; consumer plans published with month-to-month options
Best For	Developers embedding per-second API video generation and teams generating short clips	Creators and teams needing an integrated creative suite combining generation and editing	Creators seeking consumer-facing credit plans for short-form generation
Key Strength	Public unit pricing for API usage; documented credit economics for web usage	Integrated creative toolset combining editing and generative features	Consumer-focused plan clarity and up-resolution options in published consumer tiers
Key Weakness	Public review sentiment indicates risks related to billing and support; consumer access continuity is uncertain in some reports	Pricing complexity at scale and potential need for higher tiers for enterprise features	Short duration limits and variability in output quality similar to other AI video tools