Harver

Name: Harver
Brand: Harver
Rating: 4.6 (187 reviews)

Better Talent Decisions. Faster. | Hire top talent faster with predictive assessments and automated solutions.

Est 1989|Valuation $9.2M|Raised $13.7M|51 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 14K|Web traffic 808K|FTEs 179|HQ Atlanta, Georgia, US

MarketsInterviewing & Assessment

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Harver's strengths include a combined workflow, assessment, and candidate-experience approach aimed at high-volume hiring scenarios and emphasis on ATS integrations, including a Workday certified integration. Competitors may have advantages in areas such as: - HireVue: selected when the primary need is video interviewing at scale with an emphasis on explicit security and compliance artifacts (SOC 2 referenced in competitor materials). - TestGorilla: transparent pricing and quick onboarding are advantages for smaller teams or organizations that want to trial assessments rapidly. - The Predictive Index: published plan information and a broader talent optimization suite can be appealing to organizations seeking a single vendor across hiring and development. Adoption trends and market signals: - Review platform presence shows Harver in the Talent Assessment Software category, though review volume is lower than some newer SMB-focused tools. - Harver’s consolidation path and acquisition activity indicates a strategic move toward a broader talent decisioning offering.

	Harver	HireVue	TestGorilla
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (sales-led, custom quotes)	Not publicly listed; sales-led demo packages	Transparent tiering available; free tier and paid plans, with higher tiers priced for enterprise usage
Target Use Case	Enterprise volume-hiring workflows + assessments + ATS integration	Enterprise video interviewing + automation + assessments	Skills testing with transparent pricing; SMB to mid-market and expanding enterprise features
Key Strength	Integrated workflow and assessment capability for high-volume hiring	Mature enterprise interviewing stack; security and compliance messaging	Transparent pricing and quick onboarding; broad test library
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; learning curve; candidate friction risk if assessments are long	Sales-led engagement and some reported technical/scheduling issues	May need additional tooling for complex enterprise volume-hiring journeys

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Competitors may have advantages in areas such as:

HireVue: selected when the primary need is video interviewing at scale with an emphasis on explicit security and compliance artifacts (SOC 2 referenced in competitor materials).
TestGorilla: transparent pricing and quick onboarding are advantages for smaller teams or organizations that want to trial assessments rapidly.
The Predictive Index: published plan information and a broader talent optimization suite can be appealing to organizations seeking a single vendor across hiring and development.

Adoption trends and market signals:

Review platform presence shows Harver in the Talent Assessment Software category, though review volume is lower than some newer SMB-focused tools.
Harver’s consolidation path and acquisition activity indicates a strategic move toward a broader talent decisioning offering.

	Harver	HireVue	TestGorilla
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (sales-led, custom quotes)	Not publicly listed; sales-led demo packages	Transparent tiering available; free tier and paid plans, with higher tiers priced for enterprise usage
Target Use Case	Enterprise volume-hiring workflows + assessments + ATS integration	Enterprise video interviewing + automation + assessments	Skills testing with transparent pricing; SMB to mid-market and expanding enterprise features
Key Strength	Integrated workflow and assessment capability for high-volume hiring	Mature enterprise interviewing stack; security and compliance messaging	Transparent pricing and quick onboarding; broad test library
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; learning curve; candidate friction risk if assessments are long	Sales-led engagement and some reported technical/scheduling issues	May need additional tooling for complex enterprise volume-hiring journeys