Tilt

Name: Tilt
Brand: Tilt
Rating: 4.6 (29 reviews)

Tilt is a B2B leave-of-absence management platform that automates leave plan generation, provides HR/manager/employee dashboards and HRIS/payroll integrations, and pairs customers with assigned Leave Success Managers for human-assisted support.

Est 2017|Valuation $76.4M|Raised $33.7M|16 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 9K|Website|FTEs 152|HQ Fort Collins, Colorado, US

MarketsTime, Attendance, & Leave Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Feature differentiation - Tilt emphasizes a software-first LOA system combined with assigned support resources and vendor AI components for plan generation. - Cocoon emphasizes automation and certified support staff and provides stated implementation timeframes. - AbsenceSoft emphasizes enterprise scale and integrated LOA + accommodations management. Pricing comparison - Tilt provides public per-employee pricing, which can assist initial budgeting; integration add-ons and contract minimums affect effective TCO. - Cocoon publishes pricing mechanics (annual per-employee pricing plus implementation) but typically requires engagement for an exact quote. - AbsenceSoft requires sales engagement for pricing. Buyer interpretation - Tilt’s public pricing supports easier initial budgeting, but buyers must assess add-ons and minimums. Buyers should validate integration complexity and confirm implementation timelines with each vendor. Market adoption signals - Publicly available company profiles and vendor statements indicate a small-to-mid sized employee base and stated product claims; third-party directories corroborate basic company information but do not provide authoritative market share metrics.

	Tilt (vendor site)	Cocoon (vendor site)	AbsenceSoft (vendor site)
Starting Price	Published per-employee-per-month pricing with tiered plans and a published contract minimum	Publishes a per-employee-per-year pricing approach plus implementation fees (requires engagement for exact figure)	Contact sales (custom quote)
Best For	Mid-market employers seeking a software-first LOA solution with assigned support resources and published per-employee pricing	Companies seeking structured leave management with integrated support and an implementation timeline	Larger organizations needing combined LOA + ADA/PWFA accommodations workflows and enterprise scale
Key Strength	Published per-employee pricing; assigned Leave Success Manager support; stated SOC 2 Type II audit	Broad HRIS integrations and explicitly stated implementation guidance	Enterprise scale claims and an emphasis on ADA/PWFA workflows
Key Weakness	Support SLA targets and AI claims require validation; possible scope gaps versus full TPAs	Pricing requires engagement for exact quotes; vendor-authored ROI claims should be validated	Pricing transparency and potential over-capacity for smaller buyers

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Feature differentiation

Tilt emphasizes a software-first LOA system combined with assigned support resources and vendor AI components for plan generation.
Cocoon emphasizes automation and certified support staff and provides stated implementation timeframes.
AbsenceSoft emphasizes enterprise scale and integrated LOA + accommodations management.

Pricing comparison

Tilt provides public per-employee pricing, which can assist initial budgeting; integration add-ons and contract minimums affect effective TCO.
Cocoon publishes pricing mechanics (annual per-employee pricing plus implementation) but typically requires engagement for an exact quote.
AbsenceSoft requires sales engagement for pricing.

Buyer interpretation

Tilt’s public pricing supports easier initial budgeting, but buyers must assess add-ons and minimums. Buyers should validate integration complexity and confirm implementation timelines with each vendor.

Market adoption signals

Publicly available company profiles and vendor statements indicate a small-to-mid sized employee base and stated product claims; third-party directories corroborate basic company information but do not provide authoritative market share metrics.

	Tilt (vendor site)	Cocoon (vendor site)	AbsenceSoft (vendor site)
Starting Price	Published per-employee-per-month pricing with tiered plans and a published contract minimum	Publishes a per-employee-per-year pricing approach plus implementation fees (requires engagement for exact figure)	Contact sales (custom quote)
Best For	Mid-market employers seeking a software-first LOA solution with assigned support resources and published per-employee pricing	Companies seeking structured leave management with integrated support and an implementation timeline	Larger organizations needing combined LOA + ADA/PWFA accommodations workflows and enterprise scale
Key Strength	Published per-employee pricing; assigned Leave Success Manager support; stated SOC 2 Type II audit	Broad HRIS integrations and explicitly stated implementation guidance	Enterprise scale claims and an emphasis on ADA/PWFA workflows
Key Weakness	Support SLA targets and AI claims require validation; possible scope gaps versus full TPAs	Pricing requires engagement for exact quotes; vendor-authored ROI claims should be validated	Pricing transparency and potential over-capacity for smaller buyers