Hive

Name: Hive
Brand: Hive

Project management on your terms.

Est 2015|Valuation $56.3M|Raised $26.7M|76 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 12K|Web traffic 456K|FTEs 69|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsMarketing Work Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Hive vs Asana - Asana bundles many capabilities and emphasizes portfolios and goals at higher tiers. Hive’s pricing relies on a base platform plus optional add-ons, which can be beneficial for buyers who want modularity or problematic for buyers who prefer bundled value. Hive vs monday.com - monday.com emphasizes a configurable platform with templates and automation limits by tier. Pricing and packaging differences mean buyer cost and functionality comparisons depend on required features and expected seat counts. Hive vs ClickUp - ClickUp is known for broad feature coverage and can be cost-effective at certain tiers but can introduce complexity and a learning curve. Both Hive and ClickUp may raise concerns for organizations that prefer streamlined, minimal-feature interfaces.

Market share / adoption trends

Third-party mindshare and comparison pages indicate Hive generally has lower visibility than some larger project management suites; this should be treated as engagement data rather than definitive market share.

	Hive	Asana	monday.com Work Management
Starting Price	Free plan available; paid tiers with per-user pricing and optional add-ons	Free plan available; paid tiers with per-user pricing and bundled capabilities at higher tiers	Free plan available for limited seats; paid tiers with per-seat pricing and tiered feature access
Typical fit	Teams seeking multiple work views with optional add-on modules	Cross-functional teams needing structured workflows, reporting, and portfolios	Teams preferring a highly configurable board-based platform with templates
Key Strengths	Multi-view project management; optional modules for time tracking, proofing, etc.	Workflow structure, reporting/portfolios, mature ecosystem	Configurable boards, automations, dashboards, templates
Key Weaknesses	Multiple add-ons can increase total cost; reported UI concerns; enterprise reporting gaps	May be restrictive for teams that prefer per-team customization without governance	Pricing and feature access scale with seat counts and tiers

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Hive vs Asana

Asana bundles many capabilities and emphasizes portfolios and goals at higher tiers. Hive’s pricing relies on a base platform plus optional add-ons, which can be beneficial for buyers who want modularity or problematic for buyers who prefer bundled value.

Hive vs monday.com

monday.com emphasizes a configurable platform with templates and automation limits by tier. Pricing and packaging differences mean buyer cost and functionality comparisons depend on required features and expected seat counts.

Hive vs ClickUp

ClickUp is known for broad feature coverage and can be cost-effective at certain tiers but can introduce complexity and a learning curve. Both Hive and ClickUp may raise concerns for organizations that prefer streamlined, minimal-feature interfaces.

Market share / adoption trends

	Hive	Asana	monday.com Work Management
Starting Price	Free plan available; paid tiers with per-user pricing and optional add-ons	Free plan available; paid tiers with per-user pricing and bundled capabilities at higher tiers	Free plan available for limited seats; paid tiers with per-seat pricing and tiered feature access
Typical fit	Teams seeking multiple work views with optional add-on modules	Cross-functional teams needing structured workflows, reporting, and portfolios	Teams preferring a highly configurable board-based platform with templates
Key Strengths	Multi-view project management; optional modules for time tracking, proofing, etc.	Workflow structure, reporting/portfolios, mature ecosystem	Configurable boards, automations, dashboards, templates
Key Weaknesses	Multiple add-ons can increase total cost; reported UI concerns; enterprise reporting gaps	May be restrictive for teams that prefer per-team customization without governance	Pricing and feature access scale with seat counts and tiers