Hokodo

Name: Hokodo
Brand: Hokodo
Rating: 4.1 (87 reviews)

Europe’s leading digital trade credit platform, empowering B2B merchants to offer instant, flexible trade accounts.

Est 2017|Valuation $160.7M|Raised $181.4M|38 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 10K|Web traffic 2K|FTEs 77|HQ London, England, GB

MarketsInvoicing & Payment Processing B2B Payments

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

#### Differentiators - Hokodo: Emphasis on European B2B BNPL and trade credit, underwriting relationships, and a European payments license obtained via acquisition. Provides developer documentation and sandbox environments for integration testing. - TreviPay: Positions as a single vendor for net terms and broader payment acceptance with enterprise history and global scale. - Resolve: Positions for merchant immediate settlement and handles AR/collections with published illustrative fee examples. #### Pricing comparison - Hokodo: Described in public materials as assessing a fee or percentage but does not publish a pricing schedule. - TreviPay: Transactional fees vary and are typically program-specific; industry reporting provides broad context but not vendor-specific pricing. - Resolve: Publishes illustrative pricing examples; buyers should treat these figures as illustrative rather than definitive. #### Customer testimonials comparing products No robust public dataset of head-to-head customer quotes was found. Most publicly available material is vendor marketing or industry press. #### Market adoption trends Hokodo has expanded product scope from e-commerce to omnichannel and in-store solutions, according to company announcements and press coverage.

	Hokodo	TreviPay	Resolve (Resolve Pay)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; typically a transaction-based fee with a withheld portion from settlement	Not publicly listed; transaction fee model; varies by program	Illustrative pricing examples are publicly shown, but real pricing varies by merchant risk and program
Best For	EU B2B merchants and marketplaces needing embedded trade credit and third-party risk handling	Enterprises seeking global net terms and payments with managed AR	North America-focused merchants seeking BNPL/net terms with vendor-handled collections
Key Strength	European focus, underwriting partnerships, API documentation, and sandbox environments	Scale, global reach, enterprise operations, broader payments positioning	Illustrative pricing transparency in marketing materials and BNPL/net terms positioning
Key Weakness	Public complaints about declines, refunds, and collections UX; limited public security documentation; pricing not transparent	Pricing is custom and can be heavyweight for smaller firms	US-centric coverage; pricing varies by risk and model

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Differentiators

Hokodo: Emphasis on European B2B BNPL and trade credit, underwriting relationships, and a European payments license obtained via acquisition. Provides developer documentation and sandbox environments for integration testing.
TreviPay: Positions as a single vendor for net terms and broader payment acceptance with enterprise history and global scale.
Resolve: Positions for merchant immediate settlement and handles AR/collections with published illustrative fee examples.

Pricing comparison

Hokodo: Described in public materials as assessing a fee or percentage but does not publish a pricing schedule.
TreviPay: Transactional fees vary and are typically program-specific; industry reporting provides broad context but not vendor-specific pricing.
Resolve: Publishes illustrative pricing examples; buyers should treat these figures as illustrative rather than definitive.

Customer testimonials comparing products

No robust public dataset of head-to-head customer quotes was found. Most publicly available material is vendor marketing or industry press.

Market adoption trends

Hokodo has expanded product scope from e-commerce to omnichannel and in-store solutions, according to company announcements and press coverage.

	Hokodo	TreviPay	Resolve (Resolve Pay)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; typically a transaction-based fee with a withheld portion from settlement	Not publicly listed; transaction fee model; varies by program	Illustrative pricing examples are publicly shown, but real pricing varies by merchant risk and program
Best For	EU B2B merchants and marketplaces needing embedded trade credit and third-party risk handling	Enterprises seeking global net terms and payments with managed AR	North America-focused merchants seeking BNPL/net terms with vendor-handled collections
Key Strength	European focus, underwriting partnerships, API documentation, and sandbox environments	Scale, global reach, enterprise operations, broader payments positioning	Illustrative pricing transparency in marketing materials and BNPL/net terms positioning
Key Weakness	Public complaints about declines, refunds, and collections UX; limited public security documentation; pricing not transparent	Pricing is custom and can be heavyweight for smaller firms	US-centric coverage; pricing varies by risk and model