HQ

Name: HQ
Brand: HQ

AI Native

We are the industry-leading end-to-end enterprise solution for corporate mobility globally.

Est 2021|Valuation $92M|Raised $25.9M

LinkedIn 7K|Website|Web traffic 6K|FTEs 175|HQ New York, New York, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where the vendor appears to focus: - Aggregation of multiple suppliers and program governance rather than reliance on a single supplier network. - Invoice validation positioned as a primary ROI mechanism. - Integrations with major expense and payments platforms. Where alternatives may be stronger: - Large global ride-hail networks can offer faster time-to-coverage for common urban markets. - Some suppliers publish clearer fee schedules, which can simplify procurement in certain regions. Adoption signals: - The vendor has announced multiple supplier and platform integrations, indicating an ecosystem approach and ongoing product development. Public announcements include partnership additions and integration milestones; organizations should treat press announcements as indicators of roadmap direction and verify feature availability during procurement.

	HQ (SummitGround)	Uber for Business	Gett for Business (UK pricing schedule example)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (sales-led / negotiated)	Published per-trip pricing; charges apply	Published regional fee schedules indicate platform and booking fees
Best For	Enterprises needing multi-supplier ground consolidation, invoice validation, and program governance	Companies wanting fast rollout using a large ride-hail network with central billing and policy controls	Organizations standardizing via a marketplace model in markets where Gett has strong coverage
Key Strength	Centralized program controls, supplier aggregation, and invoice validation features; integrations with expense and card platforms	Broad network coverage in many markets and relatively fast onboarding	Published fee schedules in some regions that may reduce procurement ambiguity
Key Weakness	Sparse independent public reviews; limited public documentation of security posture; pricing opacity	Perceptions of price variability in some markets and differences between personal and business pricing reported anecdotally	Platform fees may be material and availability varies by geography

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where the vendor appears to focus:

Aggregation of multiple suppliers and program governance rather than reliance on a single supplier network.
Invoice validation positioned as a primary ROI mechanism.
Integrations with major expense and payments platforms.

Where alternatives may be stronger:

Large global ride-hail networks can offer faster time-to-coverage for common urban markets.
Some suppliers publish clearer fee schedules, which can simplify procurement in certain regions.

Adoption signals:

The vendor has announced multiple supplier and platform integrations, indicating an ecosystem approach and ongoing product development. Public announcements include partnership additions and integration milestones; organizations should treat press announcements as indicators of roadmap direction and verify feature availability during procurement.

	HQ (SummitGround)	Uber for Business	Gett for Business (UK pricing schedule example)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (sales-led / negotiated)	Published per-trip pricing; charges apply	Published regional fee schedules indicate platform and booking fees
Best For	Enterprises needing multi-supplier ground consolidation, invoice validation, and program governance	Companies wanting fast rollout using a large ride-hail network with central billing and policy controls	Organizations standardizing via a marketplace model in markets where Gett has strong coverage
Key Strength	Centralized program controls, supplier aggregation, and invoice validation features; integrations with expense and card platforms	Broad network coverage in many markets and relatively fast onboarding	Published fee schedules in some regions that may reduce procurement ambiguity
Key Weakness	Sparse independent public reviews; limited public documentation of security posture; pricing opacity	Perceptions of price variability in some markets and differences between personal and business pricing reported anecdotally	Platform fees may be material and availability varies by geography

HQ

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map