Hyyr

Name: Hyyr
Brand: Hyyr

Heldigitale datadrevne anskaffelser fra behov til gjennomføring

Raised $160K

LinkedIn 1K|Website|Web traffic 3K|FTEs 14|HQ Oslo, Oslo, NO

MarketsSource-to-Contract eSourcing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Compared with established regional incumbents (Mercell/Visma ecosystems), Hyyr appears to emphasize structured capture of procurement requirements and tools for early planning phases. Incumbent vendors typically provide more documented compliance workflows, archive capabilities, and long-tail features. - Compared with broad S2P suites (Coupa, Ariba, JAGGAER), Hyyr appears narrower in scope and more focused on tendering and contract administration for regulated public procurement rather than full procure-to-pay coverage.

Pricing comparison

Hyyr: no public price located in accessible sources.
Mercell / EU Supply CTM: some framework or marketplace documents publish module pricing for specific deployments; enterprise pricing typically depends on selected modules and scale.

Customer evidence comparing tools

No publicly accessible, independently sourced customer comparisons specifically comparing Hyyr to named alternatives were identified in this research.

	Hyyr (vendor site)	Mercell / EU Supply CTM	JAGGAER (public sector suite)
Starting Price	Not publicly available	Published module pricing reported in some framework documents; specific figures vary by deployment	Quote-based; varies by modules and scale
Target Users	Norwegian public buyers seeking structured procurement workflows and early-phase planning support	Organizations seeking a mature, modular tendering/contract stack with documented module options	Large organizations needing broad suite capabilities across sourcing, contracting, and supplier management
Key Capabilities Emphasized	Structured requirement capture, early-phase planning support, CPV suggestions, eForms integration (vendor claims)	Mature ecosystem, modular components, established customer base	Broad enterprise functionality, global experience, complex workflow support
Key Weakness	Limited publicly documented security/compliance certifications and independent reviews; early-stage vendor risk	Complexity and learning curve; ecosystem consolidation can affect choices	Higher complexity and cost; implementation-heavy

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Compared with established regional incumbents (Mercell/Visma ecosystems), Hyyr appears to emphasize structured capture of procurement requirements and tools for early planning phases. Incumbent vendors typically provide more documented compliance workflows, archive capabilities, and long-tail features.
Compared with broad S2P suites (Coupa, Ariba, JAGGAER), Hyyr appears narrower in scope and more focused on tendering and contract administration for regulated public procurement rather than full procure-to-pay coverage.

Pricing comparison

Hyyr: no public price located in accessible sources.
Mercell / EU Supply CTM: some framework or marketplace documents publish module pricing for specific deployments; enterprise pricing typically depends on selected modules and scale.

Customer evidence comparing tools

No publicly accessible, independently sourced customer comparisons specifically comparing Hyyr to named alternatives were identified in this research.

	Hyyr (vendor site)	Mercell / EU Supply CTM	JAGGAER (public sector suite)
Starting Price	Not publicly available	Published module pricing reported in some framework documents; specific figures vary by deployment	Quote-based; varies by modules and scale
Target Users	Norwegian public buyers seeking structured procurement workflows and early-phase planning support	Organizations seeking a mature, modular tendering/contract stack with documented module options	Large organizations needing broad suite capabilities across sourcing, contracting, and supplier management
Key Capabilities Emphasized	Structured requirement capture, early-phase planning support, CPV suggestions, eForms integration (vendor claims)	Mature ecosystem, modular components, established customer base	Broad enterprise functionality, global experience, complex workflow support
Key Weakness	Limited publicly documented security/compliance certifications and independent reviews; early-stage vendor risk	Complexity and learning curve; ecosystem consolidation can affect choices	Higher complexity and cost; implementation-heavy