1. Restart consistency across many resource managers (Db2, MQ, sequential files, VSAM, and distributed components) is the primary requirement. A broader restart/recovery product may be more appropriate.
2. The organization is already standardized on a competitor’s IMS operations tooling suite; consolidation on existing tooling may reduce integration friction.
3. The primary operational problem is preventing abends (code quality, debugging, or performance tooling may be more effective).
4. IMS batch jobs rarely abend and recovery processes are reliable and low-effort; PRF may not provide sufficient incremental value.
5. Known tooling conflicts exist in the environment that would require disabling needed features or add operational complexity.