1) The organization is not committed to IBM Cloud VPC as the primary runtime
- If most workloads are hosted in AWS/Azure/GCP, native VPN services in those clouds typically reduce integration friction and align with existing tooling and operational practices.
2) The objective is to replace network-level VPN with per-user, application-level, zero-trust access
- If the goal is to eliminate network-layer VPNs in favor of ZTNA or SDP, specialized ZTNA vendors may provide a more appropriate architecture.
3) Requirement for highly transparent, easy-to-model per-line-item VPN pricing
- IBM marketing pages do not always present per-connection/per-hour prices prominently; procurement may need to use the IBM Cloud catalog, pricing estimator, or sales channels to obtain clear pricing. Hyperscalers often publish dedicated VPN pricing pages.
4) Small organizations with sensitivity to support and billing friction
- Community commentary has raised concerns about support access and billing processes for some account types; procurement should validate support entitlements and escalation paths.