Because direct, product-specific user reviews are scarce, the closest authentic "voice of customer" signals come from broader mainframe discussions about cost, procurement friction, and legacy dependence.
Hacker News (cost & licensing frustration; mainframe economics):
> “No. The hardware is leased - you can't buy an IBM mainframe. All the software is priced per MIP per CPU core for your installation - regardless of how much you actually use the software.” — Hacker News commenter (thread)
This comment is not VTAM-specific, but it reflects a recurring theme: total platform economics can be a significant factor.
Reddit (access/procurement pain around older IBM/VM-era systems):
> “Any potential contact or anyone who knows of any way to help is very welcomed, as I am at a loss for how to get this machine licensed, and IBM seems to want nothing to do with it.” — Reddit user discussing a system that could run VM/ESA
Again, not a formal review of VTAM for VM/ESA, but it indicates licensing/availability friction around legacy stacks.