Published Jun 25, 2026
No public, side-by-side customer quotes were found in this research that compare IDGateway directly to those competitors in named, head-to-head procurement decisions. Vendor material and case studies more commonly compare digital workflows to prior paper-based methods rather than to specific competitor systems.
No definitive market-share statistics were identified. Evidence of adoption is drawn from named airport references and vendor communications indicating use in a number of airports.
| Starting Price | Quote (VettingGateway tiers: vendor-provided pricing; AirportGateway not publicly priced) | Quote (enterprise security platform; pricing via partners) | Quote (enterprise access control; pricing via integrators) |
| Best fit | Airports that require a purpose-built ID centre portal and sponsor workflows; regulated employers needing integrated vetting to pass application processes | Airports needing an integrated security management system with access control and airport-specific features | Large enterprises or airports standardised on the Lenel ecosystem looking for a broad access control and badging solution |
| Key strength | Airport-specific workflow portal and sponsor/signatory flows; integration paths between vetting and pass application processes; visible adoption in a number of airports | Aviation-specific command-and-control and system integration for security management | Broad integrator ecosystem, extensive hardware and ecosystem support |
| Key weakness | Limited publicly available third-party reviews; pricing transparency limited; solution is airport-centric and may be more than required outside regulated contexts | Potentially higher infrastructure and operational complexity; relies on professional services for some airport projects | Can be operationally complex; community discussions sometimes cite upgrade and support friction |