Industri-Matematik International

Name: Industri-Matematik International
Brand: Industri-Matematik International
Rating: 5 (1 reviews)

Logistics delivered.

Est 1967|Valuation $8.3M

LinkedIn 2K|Website|Web traffic 11K|FTEs 170|HQ Linköping, Ostergotland County, SE

MarketsMaterials Management

Industri-Matematik International screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- IMI offers an integrated suite strategy (order management + warehouse execution + adjacent logistics capabilities), similar in scope to larger vendors but with a smaller global footprint. - Tier-1 vendors (Manhattan, SAP EWM, Blue Yonder) often are selected when buyers require globally standardized, extremely feature-rich WMS capabilities and can support large-scale program delivery. - IMI may be considered by buyers that prioritize configurable distribution execution and a vendor perceived as more regionally focused; assertions of relative responsiveness or bureaucracy should be validated via customer references.

Market share / adoption trends

IMI reports several hundred customers and handles a very large volume of order lines annually across its installed base.
Broader market context indicates incumbent vendors such as Oracle, SAP, and Blue Yonder are frequently referenced in enterprise stacks.

	IMI Supply Chain Solutions	SAP Extended Warehouse Management (EWM)	Manhattan Associates WMS	Blue Yonder WMS
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Quote/configuration dependent	Typically quote-based enterprise pricing	Often quote-based; third-party estimates vary
Best For	Complex, high-volume distribution; Nordics/EU presence; integrated WMS + AOM + adjacent modules	Companies standardized on SAP S/4HANA; deep ERP integration; global enterprises	High-volume, complex distribution needing Tier-1 WMS depth	Large enterprise warehousing with a broad supply chain portfolio
Key Strength	Configurability and long domain history; customer references in retail/wholesale/3PL; public ISO certification claim	Tight SAP ecosystem integration; broad enterprise footprint	Tier-1 WMS functionality depth for complex operations	Broad supply chain portfolio and enterprise positioning
Key Weakness	Less transparent pricing; fewer broadly visible independent reviews; smaller global partner ecosystem compared with Tier-1 vendors	Complexity and cost; SAP skills required	Cost and integration project risk	Cost and pricing variability

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

IMI offers an integrated suite strategy (order management + warehouse execution + adjacent logistics capabilities), similar in scope to larger vendors but with a smaller global footprint.
Tier-1 vendors (Manhattan, SAP EWM, Blue Yonder) often are selected when buyers require globally standardized, extremely feature-rich WMS capabilities and can support large-scale program delivery.
IMI may be considered by buyers that prioritize configurable distribution execution and a vendor perceived as more regionally focused; assertions of relative responsiveness or bureaucracy should be validated via customer references.

Market share / adoption trends

IMI reports several hundred customers and handles a very large volume of order lines annually across its installed base.
Broader market context indicates incumbent vendors such as Oracle, SAP, and Blue Yonder are frequently referenced in enterprise stacks.

	IMI Supply Chain Solutions	SAP Extended Warehouse Management (EWM)	Manhattan Associates WMS	Blue Yonder WMS
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Quote/configuration dependent	Typically quote-based enterprise pricing	Often quote-based; third-party estimates vary
Best For	Complex, high-volume distribution; Nordics/EU presence; integrated WMS + AOM + adjacent modules	Companies standardized on SAP S/4HANA; deep ERP integration; global enterprises	High-volume, complex distribution needing Tier-1 WMS depth	Large enterprise warehousing with a broad supply chain portfolio
Key Strength	Configurability and long domain history; customer references in retail/wholesale/3PL; public ISO certification claim	Tight SAP ecosystem integration; broad enterprise footprint	Tier-1 WMS functionality depth for complex operations	Broad supply chain portfolio and enterprise positioning
Key Weakness	Less transparent pricing; fewer broadly visible independent reviews; smaller global partner ecosystem compared with Tier-1 vendors	Complexity and cost; SAP skills required	Cost and integration project risk	Cost and pricing variability